1 / 15

# Decimal Fractions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Decimal Fractions. Which of these is the smallest number? Explain why you think your answer is correct. 0.625 0.25 0.375 0.5 0.125. Source: TIMSS 1999, Middle School, B-10, p-value = 46%. Key Knowledge for Understanding Decimal Fractions. Place value system Partitioning numbers

Related searches for Decimal Fractions

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

## PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Decimal Fractions' - mya

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

• Which of these is the smallest number? Explain why you think your answer is correct.

• 0.625

• 0.25

• 0.375

• 0.5

• 0.125

Source: TIMSS 1999, Middle School, B-10, p-value = 46%

Key Knowledge for Understanding Decimal Fractions

• Place value system

• Partitioning numbers

• Representing values less than a whole

• Fraction

• Meaning of denominator and numerator (unitizing)

• Equivalent fractions (reunitizing)

• Strategies showing conceptual understanding

• Common unit (use smallest place value)

• Composite units (use each place value separately)

Adapted from Stacey & Steinle (1999)

• Shorter is Smaller

• Using whole number reasoning

• Decimal-Fraction connection not established

• Longer is Smaller

• Misunderstanding of decimal-fraction connection, particularly denominator and numerator relationship (e.g., 0.35 means 1/35)

• Apparent-Expert Behavior

• Follow correct rules without understanding why:

• Equalizing with zeros  CAUTION: Reinforces whole number reasoning

• Comparing digits from left to right

“The squares in the 2nd one are much smaller than in the first.”

Always give correct answer of 0.125

Always give correct answer of 0.125

Always give correct answer of 0.125 and talk about comparing place values or relative size of numbers.

• Use multiple representations

• Number line model (placement and reading)

• Fraction notation

• Real-life context (e.g., money; volume)

• Emphasize fraction-decimal connection

Strategies for DevelopingDecimal Fraction Understanding

• Discuss role of zero

• When does zero affect a number’s value? How does it affect the value?

• Example:

• Starting with the number 23.5, place a 0 so that the new number is:

• Equivalent

• Larger

• Smaller

• Which is smaller, 0. or 0.    ?

• Write two decimals between 0.4 and 0.5

• Explain why 0.5 is equal to ½.

• Which of these is the smallest number? Explain why you think your answer is correct.

• 0.625

• 0.25

• 0.375

• 0.5

• 0.125

• Mutiplication and Division break “rules”

• Multiplying by a value between 0 and 1 makes the product smaller.

• Dividing by a value between 0 and 1 gives a bigger quotient.

• How can you help students make sense of these outcomes?

• Patterns:

• 8 x 50 = 12 / 20 =

• 8 x 5 = 12 / 2 =

• 8 x .5 = 12 / .2 =

• 8 x .05 = 12 / .02 =

• Contextualized problems:

• I have 5 meters of ribbon and each bow requires 0.5 meters of ribbon. How many bows can I make?

• Martine, S. L., Bay-Williams, J. M. (2003). Investigating students’ conceptual understanding of decimal fractions using multiple representations. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School,8(5), 244-247.

• Resnick, L. B., Nesher, P., Leonard, F., Magone, M., Omanson, S., & Peled, I. (1989). Conceptual bases of arithmetic errors: The case of decimal fractions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 8-27.

• Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 346-362.

• Stacey, K., & Steinle, V. (1999). A longitudinal study of children’s thinking about decimals: A preliminary analysis. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. (Vol. 4, pp. 233-240). Haifa: PME.