1 / 21

STF 360 Mains Results and perspectives

STF 360 Mains Results and perspectives. 1. User centric E2E session. User expectations. Any terminal or any access to use any service in a heterogeneous environment. Continuous comprehensive service throughout the whole session while moving or changing terminal

mtheodore
Download Presentation

STF 360 Mains Results and perspectives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. STF 360Mains Results and perspectives 1 TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives

  2. User centric E2E session TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives

  3. User expectations • Any terminal or any access to use any service in a heterogeneous environment. • Continuous comprehensive service throughout the whole session while moving or changing terminal • During this session, service connectivity is considered as a composition of elements in each layer (User, Terminal, Network and Service). TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives

  4. Dynamic Management Conception E2E QoS Provisioning Transfer Management Instrumentation Monitoring Lifecycle of QoS management (Convergence of planes) Innovative points of STF 360 • User centric approach (Personalization: E2E Service Composition, User profile) • E2E QoS continuity according to user’s preference (QoS model). • Dynamic QoS management at every network interface (Home network, Access network, Core network and Service network) Context: One multiservice session considering heterogeneous and mobility environment (User mobility, terminal mobility, service mobility and network mobility) TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives

  5. SE52 SE53 SE4 SE3 SE2 SE1 SE51 SE8 Service node QoS SE9 SE10 Service node QoS VPSN Network QoS Network QoS Equipement QoS Equipement QoS E2E QoS Continuity End-to-end User centric Session binding E2E QoS signaling Core Network Core Network Access Network 3 Access Network 2 Access Network 1 Infosphere AmbientGrid Seamless Userware TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives

  6. Profils 1 Operator N Subscription 1 Subscribes Belong to 1 has 1 N User Service profile Service • User profile • General • information • Preferences/ • Locations • Activities • Role Network 1 has 1 Terminal Network profile User • Real-time • Profile • QoS model: • Availability • Delay • Fidelity • Capacity Terminal Profile Interaction TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives

  7. Proposed WI for enhancement: “Enhanced SIP for personalized composition of services supporting E2E QoS expected from a user centric point of view”

  8. Scope of work to be undertaken • Service layer plays an important role in the end-to-end QoS. • But today, this is not taken into consideration and most of all, the services do not account for it. • The user centric session is the mean to choose the component of services in order to have the overall personalized service, from the terminal level to the service level, through the network level. • Today SIP supports network resource allocation. It seems as well to be a good candidate for resource allocation at service level. • Also, from a user centric point of view, QoS could be enhanced by using service composition, for which SIP could also be useful.. • Moreover, such possibility could be seen as a new opportunity for operators to provide new offers with their partners. • A standardized approach for the composition of services supporting E2E QoS should facilitate the convergence of Telco and IT services. TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives

  9. Goal • What : End to End QoS in User Centric Context • Why : Because each level contributes at this QoS • Equipment : Computing delivery (CPU and memory) • Network : Media delivery • Service (components and platform) : Service delivery • How : With top down* approach (through SIP), service composition (SoA) and user preferences *versus IN that are bottom-up (BCP/PoI/PoR) TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives

  10. SE2 CA3 CA4 CA1 CA2 Why : E2E QoS (traceability) SE1 SE3 SE1 PoP PoP PoP PoP TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives

  11. How : Proposed Platform TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives

  12. USE CASE 12 TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives

  13. QoS E2E dynamic management (Terminal, Access Network, Core Network, Service Level) + Service Composition (Service Level Using SIP) • Community = Component of service functionally equivalent and QoS equivalent. Community A SE Community B SE Community C SE Community D SE SE7 Community E SE SE12 SE10 SE8 SE8 SE1 SE9 SE11 SE2 SE3 SE12 SE4 SE6 SE5 Service Level Core Network IMS Service composition regarding User Needs = SE4+SE6+SE8 Access Network TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives 13 Service Request

  14. Session Continuity Session regarding User request Session after SE4 deterioration Session after mobility SE10 Community A SE12 SE Community B SE7 SE8 SE SE8 SE1 SE9 SE2 Community C SE3 SE SE11 SE12 Community D SE4 SE6 SE Community E SE5 SE Serviceware Core Network IMS Community Management => Dynamic Provisioning per functional or equivalent QoS = SE2+SE6+SE8 E2E QoS Maintaining Control => Dynamic re provisioning after mobility = SE3+SE6+SE8 Access Network Access Network TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives 14 Service Request

  15. What : The User Centric context • New Approach ≠ Network or Application Centric • A unique session with the services continuity • Personalization through Service Composition • Environment discovery (P2P) • Ambient Networks • Trans-organizational User Mobility Network Mobility Terminal Mobility A Service Mobility A : Temporal Mobility TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives

  16. CA1 CA4 CA3 SE2 CA2 The visibility levels User level Users (the demand), commercial (the offer) VO : virtual organization Service level Services providers VPSN (Virtual Private Service Network SE: service element SE1 SE3 SE1 Network level Network operator Access provider CA : Access Switch PoP PoP PoP PoP Equipment level TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives

  17. New Vision • Future Internet, Internet of services • Cooperation between heterogeneous networks • Convergence of fix-mobile (Networks) • Convergence of services (Telco, Web, IT) • Convergence of three planes (interfaces) • Autonomous and autonomic management Service network NGN/NGS Middleware Core Network Fixed network Access Network 1 Wireless network Access Network 2 Wired network Access Network 3 Wireless network Seamless Userware TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives

  18. Conclusions • The strategic issues • Exposable Services: likely to create value • Value share: Trans-organizational • Fulfill the “User Centric” approach • Architectures Engineering : E2E QoS • ROI and TTM • End to end dynamic and flexible Session TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives

  19. More information • ETSI for STF 360 http://portal.etsi.org/Portal_Common/home.asp • Documents available or soon to be • DTR/USER-00029-3 (TR 102 805-3) • DTR/USER-00029-1 (TR 102 805-1) • DTR/USER-00029-2 (TR 102 805-2) • DTR/USER-00031 (TR 102 806) TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives

More Related