1 / 26

Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State

This workshop provides an overview of the process of learning outcomes assessment at Texas State University, including how to identify and describe program missions and outcomes, assess results, create action plans, and provide evidence of improvement. Participants will also learn how to use tools for reporting outcomes assessment.

mpacheco
Download Presentation

Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director, University Planning and Assessment February 25, 2009

  2. Workshop Goals Participants will learn about: • The value of student learning outcomes assessment • Procedures for the outcomes assessment process at Texas State • How to identify and describe the program mission, outcomes, methods of assessment, results, action plans, and evidence of improvement • How to use tools for reporting outcomes assessment (demo)

  3. Value of Student Learning Outcomes Assessment “Just as diagnosis without treatment is not very helpful to a sick patient, assessment without analysis and action can do little for an institution.” -- Braskamp, 1989

  4. We have always assessed student learning outcomes. What is different about this process is that we are looking for evidence of whether our students are learning what we want them to learn as an element of program assessment and improvement.

  5. In higher education, the term assessment traditionally has two components: • gathering information in a prescribed manner (i.e., measurement) and • interpreting that information to make decisions about policy, curriculum, instruction, or assessment practices (i.e., evaluation).

  6. Linkages to Other University Assessment • Academic Program Review • College and University strategic planning • Program and University accreditations

  7. Why are Student Learning Outcomes So Important? • basis for program improvement • instruction, course design, curricular design • communicate instructional intent • increase awareness of learning (for students) • common language • advising materials • promotional materials • support accreditation

  8. SACS Standard 3.3.1 The institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves these outcomes, and provides evidence of improvement based on analysis of the results in each of the following areas: 3.3.1.1 Educational programs, to include student learning outcomes      3.3.1.2 Administrative support services      3.3.1.3 Educational support services      3.3.1.4 Research within its educational mission, if appropriate      3.3.1.5 Community/public service within its educational mission, if appropriate

  9. Procedures for Outcomes Assessment Process at Texas State • Focus on Student Learning • Faculty driven process • Input regarding outcomes by faculty • Assessment by faculty • Discussion of results and actions that need to be taken by faculty • Adjustments in program delivery by faculty

  10. Procedures for Outcomes Assessment Includes description of mission, outcomes, methods of assessment, results, action plans, and evidence of improvement Submitted electronically Approved by chairs and deans Formally reviewed by associate deans Conducted on annual basis (academic year)

  11. Timeline for Outcomes Assessment • In the fall of each academic year • all academic programs revise and submit their program mission statement, 5 to 8 learning outcomes, and two methods of assessment for each outcome • In the spring of each academic year • all academic programs submit their results, action plans, and evidence of improvement

  12. Identifying and Describing Outcomes Assessment Mission Student learning outcomes Methods of assessment Results Action Plans Evidence of Improvement

  13. mission Convey the specific intent of the program Define the core purpose of the program

  14. student learning outcomes • Describe specific behaviors that a student of the program should demonstrate upon completion of the program • Focus on the intended abilities, knowledge, values, and attitudes of the student • Include measureable development of cognitive, psychomotor and affective skills pertinent to the program • Provide insight for program improvement

  15. methods • provide an objective, effective, efficient, and controllable means of verifying the achievement of student outcomes • predominately focus on direct assessments • indicate who will be assessed; how you will assess each of your outcomes; when and where you will assess each outcome; what specific learning will be assessed; and the targetyou expect to achieve • provide multiple (at least two) ways to assess each outcome

  16. results Reflect upon and discuss findings from corresponding method Based on reliable and valid data collection Indicate level of achievement of performance target Provide indicators for improvement More than reporting grades

  17. action plans Based on reported findings/results Are feasible Should lead to continuous improvement in student learning Enhance effectiveness of the program Provide for efficient use of resources

  18. evidence of improvement Founded in the results Focus on improvement in student learning

  19. Using Tools for Reporting Outcomes Assessment • Website for Outcomes Assessment • On-line Instructions • Data entry • Approvals • Reports

  20. Re-Cap of Process Step 2: Define program goals Step 3: Define student learning outcomes Step 4: Inventory existing and needed assessment methods Step 5: Identify assessment methods for each learning outcome Step 1: Define program mission

  21. Step 7: Gather data as indicated in methods Step 8: Draft results Step 9: Discuss possible action plans Step 10: Note areas of improvement in student learning Step 6: Deliver program

  22. Closing the Loop Define/Revise Mission & Goals Identify/Revise Outcomes Create & Implement Action Plan Select/Revise Methods of Assessment Assess Student Learning results & evidence of improvement Develop/Revise Curriculum and Instruction

  23. Challenges and Pitfalls • one size does not fit all — some methods work well for one program but not others • do not try to do the perfect assessment all at once — take a continuous improvement approach • allow for ongoing feedback and discussion • concentrate on learning that is most important and where you have control

  24. questions and comments

  25. Resources • Academic Outcomes Assessment • https://virtualwebapp.cr.txstate.edu/academicoutcomes/default.aspx • Administrative Outcomes Assessment • https://virtualwebapp.cr.txstate.edu/administrativeoutcomes/ • Presentations • http://www.upa.txstate.edu/Presentations.html

  26. Contacts • Beth Wuest, Director • Academic Development and Assessment • 150 J.C. Kellam 245-2112 • Lisa Garza, Director • University Planning and Assessment • 1084 J.C. Kellam 245-2780

More Related