research methodology be 5305 n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Research Methodology BE-5305 PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Research Methodology BE-5305

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 15

Research Methodology BE-5305 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Research Methodology BE-5305. Literature Review. Introduction. Literature review surveys sources relevant to a particular issue, area of research or theory providing a description, summary, and critical evaluation of each work e.g from: Scholarly articles Books Dissertations and Thesis

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Research Methodology BE-5305' - morna

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
  • Literature review surveys sources relevant to a particular issue, area of research or theory providing a description, summary, and critical evaluation of each work e.g from:
    • Scholarly articles
    • Books
    • Dissertations and Thesis
    • Conference Proceedings
stages of literature review
Stages of Literature Review
  • Problem formulation
  • Literature Search
  • Data Evaluation
  • Analysis and Interpretation
elements of literature review
Elements of Literature Review
  • Overview of the subject, issue or theory under consideration, along with the objectives of the lit. review
  • Division of works under review into categories (support vs against)
  • Explanation of how each work is similar to and how it varies form the others
  • Conclusions
consideration should be given to
Consideration should be given to..
  • Provenance- author’s credentials
  • Objectivity
  • Persuasiveness
  • Value
purpose of lit review
Purpose of Lit. Review
  • Place each work in the context of its contribution to the understanding of the subject under review
  • Describe the relationship of each work to others
  • Identify new ways to interpret, and shed light on any gaps
  • Resolve conflicts
  • Point the way forward for further research
why do we need good lit review
Why do we need good lit. review?
  • To demonstrate that you know the field.
  • To justify the reason for your research
  • To allow you to establish your theoretical framework and methodological focus
starting point
Starting point..
  • Pursue recent review articles
    • Too much to handle
    • Very little there
      • Doing something new
      • Limiting yourself to too narrow an area
      • Not a worthwhile area of research
quality of literature
Quality of Literature
  • Is the problem clearly spelled out?
  • Are the results presented new?
  • Was the research influential?
  • How large a sample was used?
  • How convincing is the argument made?
  • How were the results analyzed?
  • What perspective are they coming from?
  • Are the generalizations justified by the evidence on which they are made?
  • What is the significance of this research?
  • What are the assumptions behind the research?
  • Is the methodology well justified as the most appropriate to study the problem?
  • Is the theoretical basis transparent?

In critically evaluating, you are looking for :

(i) Strengths, significance and contributions

(ii) Limitations, flaws and weaknesses

(iii) Whole lines of enquiry

simple way to do lit review
Simple way to do lit. review
  • Start with a series of paragraphs???
      • “Green (1975) discovered….”;
      • “In 1978, Black conducted experiments and discovered that …”;
      • “Later Brown (1980) illustrated this in ….”
  • NO!!! This demonstrates neither your understanding of the literature nor your ability to evaluate other people’s work
this way is better
This way is better…..
  • “There seems to be general agreement on x, (for example, White 1987, Brown 1980, Black 1978, Green 1975) but Green (1975) sees x as a consequence of y, while Black (1978) puts x and y as having no effects on one another. While Green’s work has some limitations in that it…, its main value lies in….”
  • This shows that you have thought about it, can synthesize the work and pass judgement on the relative merits of research conducted in your field
mind mapping
Mind Mapping

Green 1975

On x and y..

y x

x no relp to y

Relationship of x and y

Black 1978


look back
Look back…
  • Ask yourself questions like these:
    • What is the specific thesis, problem, or research question that my literature review helps to define?
    • What type of literature review am I conducting?
    • What is the scope of my literature review?
    • How good was my information seeking?
    • Have I critically analyzed the literature I use?
    • Have I cited and discussed studies contrary to my perspective?
    • Will the reader find my literature review relevant, appropriate and useful?