370 likes | 499 Views
This comprehensive discussion explores the importance of ethical codes in professions such as doctors, lawyers, engineers, and journalists. It covers the significance of enforcing sanctions for violations, including loss of license, and debates whether journalism can be considered a profession without infringing on the First Amendment. The rise of professionalism in journalism, exemplified by figures like Adolph Ochs and Joseph Pulitzer, is also analyzed alongside the development and revisions of journalistic ethical canons over the years. Case studies and discussions shed light on the challenges faced by professionals in upholding ethical standards and maintaining objectivity. Additionally, it delves into the adoption of ethical codes like the SPJ Code of Ethics, emphasizing the core principles of seeking truth, minimizing harm, acting independently, and being accountable.
E N D
Codes of ethics Defining and describingstandards and best practices
Professions with ethical codes • Doctors
Professions with ethical codes • Doctors • Lawyers
Professions with ethical codes • Doctors • Lawyers • Engineers, etc.
Sanctions for violations • Loss of license
Sanctions for violations • Loss of license • What is to stop someone from setting up practice without a license?
Sanctions for violations • Loss of license • What is to stop someone from setting up practice without a license? • Government enforcement
The great debate • Is journalism a profession?
The great debate • Is journalism a profession? • Can it be a profession without violating the First Amendment?
The great debate • Is journalism a profession? • Can it be a profession without violating the First Amendment? • Can we have a binding code of ethics?
The rise of professionalism • Adolph Ochs and the New York Times
The rise of professionalism • Adolph Ochs and the New York Times • Joseph Pulitzer (right) seeks a legacy
The rise of professionalism • Adolph Ochs and the New York Times • Joseph Pulitzer (right) seeks a legacy • Sigma Delta Chi founded in 1909
“Canons of Journalism” (1922) • Developed by the American Society of Newspaper Editors • Revised in 1975, now called the “Statement of Principles”
“Canons of Journalism” (1922) • Article 1: Responsibility
“Canons of Journalism” (1922) • Article 1: Responsibility • Article 2: Freedom of the press
“Canons of Journalism” (1922) • Article 1: Responsibility • Article 2: Freedom of the press • Article 3: Independence
“Canons of Journalism” (1922) • Article 1: Responsibility • Article 2: Freedom of the press • Article 3: Independence • Article 4: Truth and accuracy
“Canons of Journalism” (1922) • Article 1: Responsibility • Article 2: Freedom of the press • Article 3: Independence • Article 4: Truth and accuracy • Article 5: Impartiality
“Canons of Journalism” (1922) • Article 1: Responsibility • Article 2: Freedom of the press • Article 3: Independence • Article 4: Truth and accuracy • Article 5: Impartiality • Article 6: Fair play
Discussion • Where is objectivity?
Discussion • Where is objectivity? • If the code isn’t binding, what good is it?
Discussion • Where is objectivity? • If the code isn’t binding, what good is it? • If the code is common sense, why have there been so many scandals?
SPJ Code of Ethics • Borrowed from ASNE in 1926 • Current code adopted in 1996 • Four broad areas
SPJ Code of Ethics • Borrowed from ASNE in 1926 • Current code adopted in 1996 • Four broad areas • Seek Truth and Report It
SPJ Code of Ethics • Borrowed from ASNE in 1926 • Current code adopted in 1996 • Four broad areas • Seek Truth and Report It • Minimize Harm
SPJ Code of Ethics • Borrowed from ASNE in 1926 • Current code adopted in 1996 • Four broad areas • Seek Truth and Report It • Minimize Harm • Act Independently
SPJ Code of Ethics • Borrowed from ASNE in 1926 • Current code adopted in 1996 • Four broad areas • Seek Truth and Report It • Minimize Harm • Act Independently • Be Accountable
Case study: The Big Dig • Globe had memo warning of safety problems • Couldn’t reach contractor for comment • Memo turned out to be a likely forgery
Case study: The Big Dig • Should contractor have been given more time to respond?
Case study: The Big Dig • Should contractor have been given more time to respond? • Would it have mattered?
Case study: The Big Dig • Should contractor have been given more time to respond? • Would it have mattered? • How long can you wait on a breaking story?
Journalists and politics (I) Armstrong Williams and Maggie Gallagher
Journalists and politics (II) • MSNBC.com reported on scores of journalists making political donations • Many media outlets do not prohibit donations, despite codes of ethics • Rosenstiel: Opinion journalists should be treated the same as news reporters
What does the public think? • 34 percent: No way • 30 percent: No problem • 37 percent: No problem as long as there’s disclosure