1 / 4

Evaluating Social Capital: Principles for Assessment and Review of Programs

This guide by Professor Dan Li examines quantitative and qualitative methods for assessing social capital programs, emphasizing clear conceptualization, appropriate research design, indicators, statistical analysis, and drawing conclusions.

moral
Download Presentation

Evaluating Social Capital: Principles for Assessment and Review of Programs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 「社會資本」的評估與有關計劃的檢討 石丹理 香港中文大學社會工作學系教授 香港社會服務聯會社會發展委員會主席

  2. 定量評估及檢討(Quantitative Assessment and Evaluation) 原則一：界定「社會資本」的範圍 (Clear and Delimited Conceptualization) 原則二：選擇適合的研究設計 (Appropriate Research Design) • 實驗性設計 (Experimental Designs) • 單一系統設計 (Single Systems Design – B/AB) 原則三：選擇適合的指標 (Appropriate Indicators) • 本土工具相對西方工具 • 心理測量特性(信度、效度、標準化) 原則四：選擇適合的統計分析 (Appropriate Statistical Tests to Assess Change) 原則五：了解限制，作出適切的結論 (Drawing Appropriate Conclusions)

  3. 定質評估及檢討(Qualitative Assessment and Evaluation) 原則一：確立定質評估的理據 (Clear Justifications and Rationales) • 次選？容易做？ 原則二：定質研究的取向 (Philosophical Orientation) 原則三：選擇適合的資料收集方法 (Appropriate Data Collection Methods) • 「深入訪談」：How deep is in-depth? 原則四：有系統及完整的資料處理 (Systematic and Complete Documentation) 原則五：明白自己的「誤差」、「先入為主的信念」 　(Understanding Biases and Preoccupation) 原則六：了解限制，作出適當的結論 (Drawing Appropriate Conclusions) • 天真的現實主義 (Naïve Realism)?

  4. References Borgida, E., Sullivan, J.L., Oxendine, A., Jackson, M.S. & Riedel, E. (2002). Civic culture meets the digital divide: The role of community electronic networks. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 125-141. (Quantitative & Qualitative.) Cattell, V. (2001). Poor people, poor places, and poor health: The mediating role of social networks and social capital. Social Science and Medicine, 52, 1501-1516. (Qualitative.) Kahne, J., & Kim, B. (1999). The role of social capital in youth development: The case of “I have a dream” programs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 321-343. (Quantitative & Qualitative.) Morrow, V. (2001). Using qualitative methods to elicit young people’s perspectives on their environments: Some ideas for community health initiatives. Health Education Research, 16, 255-268. (Qualitative.) Robinson, R.V., & Jackson, E.F. (2001). Is trust in others declining in America? An age-period-cohort analysis. Social Science Research, 30, 117-145. (Quantitative.)

More Related