you are what you eat n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
You are what you eat! PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
You are what you eat!

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 29

You are what you eat! - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 63 Views
  • Uploaded on

You are what you eat!. “The headhunter is not content merely to possess the skull, but opens it and takes out the brain, which he eats in order by this means to acquire the wisdom and skill of his foe” GHR von Koenigswald

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'You are what you eat!' - mora


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
you are what you eat

You are what you eat!

“The headhunter is not content merely to possess the skull, but opens it and takes out the brain, which he eats in order by this means to acquire the wisdom and skill of his foe”

GHR von Koenigswald

“Diet underlies many of the behavioural and ecological differences that separate species, and so is important in defining niche, with all its implications for the ecology and evolution of extinct forms”

Peter Ungar, 2003

Dr. Susannah Thorpe, Rm W126 Email: S.K.Thorpe@bham.ac.uk

homo erectus
Homo erectus
  • Glacial conditions
  • Cave / sapling shelters
  • Fire:
    • warmth
    • protection
    • cooking?
chimpanzee diet
Chimpanzee diet
  • Fruit, insects, leaves, bark, meat (monkeys, pigs, small antelope)
  • Hunting: mostly males, cooperative & specific roles
  • Gombe – ca.150 red colobus monkeys killed during peak hunting year
  • Peak male chimp meat consumption near lower end of human consumption (5-10% of diet)
  • Excited by meat, crave it, chew it long and thoughtfully, usually with a mouthful of leaves added
  • Social event: shared between hunters/ kin/ allies
  • Infanticide- Banana provisioning?
chimpanzees medicinal plants
Chimpanzees: medicinal plants
  • Medicinal plants: pith or leaves of plants with medicinal properties
    • know when they need it
    • knowledge to select particular species that are not part of normal diet
    • Tongwa people eat the same plants for medicinal use
    • unpalatable, chimps swallow them like pills rather than chewing the leaves
    • Contain an antibiotic against bacteria, viruses, fungi and parasitic worms
australopithecines
Australopithecines
  • Tooth shape evolves to improve mechanical efficiency for chewing . - tooth morphology differs among species adapted to different diets
  • Teeth dominate fossil hominin assemblages
  • Fossil hominin teeth generally very worn, - can’t use standard measures for measuring cusp shape
  • Afarensis (top)
  • H. erectus (bottom)
slide6

Australopithecines: Topographic analysis

  • Laser scanner - generate 3D points along the surface of a tooth
  • Geographic information system (GIS) - model and characterize the surface points
  • Score teeth by wear stage - compare shape data among similarly worn specimens of different species

(Unger 2004)

slide7

Australopithecines: Topographic analysis

  • Occlusal relief:
  • high (h)
  • low (l)
  • Cusp shape:
  • sharp (s)
  • round (r)
  • blunt (b)
  •  occlusal relief and steeper cusps  efficiency in fracturing tougher, more deformable foods (leaves)
  •  occlusal relief and  steep cusps  efficiency in fracturing brittle, less deformable foods (nuts/seeds/hard fruits)
slide8

Australopithecines: Topographic analysis

A: gorilla

B: chimp

C: early Homo

D: A. afarensis

Gorilla gorilla have the steepest slopes and most relief  early HomoPan troglodytesA. afarensis which has the flattest slopes with the least relief

(Ungar 2004)

slide9

Australopithecines: Topographic analysis

  • Dental morphology reflects adaptations to primary foods, and also to less frequently eaten but still critical ones
  • Gorillas  occlusal relief and steeper cusps  efficiency in fracturing tougher, more deformable foods (leaves)
  • Both prefer soft fruits but gorillas can take advantage of fallback foods that are less accessible to chimps

A: gorilla, B: chimp

slide10

Australopithecines: Topographic analysis

  • A. afarensis:-  crown relief and  sloping occlusal surfaces than gorillas or chimps
    • more efficient fracture of brittle, less deformable foods but less efficient fracture of tough, more deformable foods
  •  preferred soft, sugar-rich fruits, but would have been able to make better use of hard, brittle resources as fallback foods given seasonal availability

of favored items

Gorilla gorilla (A)

Pan troglodytes (B)

Early Homo (c)

A. afarensis (D)

slide11

Early Homo: Topographic analysis

  • Early Homo: intermediate bw chimps & gorillas in slope and occlusal relief,  intermediate in the fracture properties of the foods to which it was adapted
  •   efficiency in fracturing tough, pliant foods than chimps or A. afarensis
  • + thinner enamel: sharp edges at sites of dentin exposure with wear would improve shredding and slicing efficiency
  • What tough foods were available to early Homo?
    • Meat: tough and elastic. > occlusal relief and steeper sloped cusps yield sharper cutting surfaces = reduces meats ability to stretch and absorb energy,  thwarts major toughening mechanism
paranthropus boisei
Paranthropus boisei
  • Ungar: A. africanus & Paranthropus lived at different times at Sterkfontein
  • A. Africanus: steeper molar cusps
  • Paranthropus: large, crushing teeth (roots/seeds)
  • Did climatic swings lead to reduction in food sources for Paranthropus?
did h erectus hunt or scavenge
Did H. erectus hunt or scavenge?
  • more food per square mile of the African savannah than plant food
  • more effective energy source
    • venison: 572 cals per 100g
    • fruit/veg <100 cals per 100g
  • Reduced risk of seasonality, esp. in Northern temperate zones
zhoukoudian china 400 000ya peking man
Zhoukoudian (China), 400,000ya ‘Peking man’

Ash, choppers, flake tools & fossilised remains of H. erectus

Cosy domestic scene, with H. erectus using fire for warmth, protection and to cook meat

Did fire played a regular

or important role in the

daily life of the

inhabitants?

slide15

Zhoukoudian (China), 400,000ya ‘Peking man’

  • Certainly some evidence of fire, but Lewis Binford :
    • Many of the extensive ash layers may be results of the decalcification of massive organic deposits (including bird droppings, bat guana, hyena faeces)
    • Fires could have been a result of the accidental ignition of the organic material, which then smouldered for some time
  • Binford found no hearths, or any association between ash, stone tools and H. erectus fossils
  • So although had all the ingredients of a cosy domestic scene the ingredients were not related
zhoukoudian china 400 000ya peking man1
Zhoukoudian (China), 400,000ya ‘Peking man’
  • Little evidence of cooking food. A few burnt bones (2 roasted horses heads), but other burnt bones had been meatless when put in the fire:  caught up in smouldering organic material
  • Binford et al:
    • hyenas responsible for most of the materials in the cave
    • H. erectus scavenged from hyenas – (hyena gnaw marks underneath hominid stone tool cut marks on some bones)

a

b

a: hyena, b: stone tools

slide17
But,
  • Stone tool evidence
    • Schick & Toth: wear patterns & experimental studies -Acheulean hand axes & cleavers were used for extensive meat eating
  • Anatomy (size and shape): Alan walker:
    • H. erectus
      • comparable to top 17% of modern human pop. in height and mass
      • anatomical stasis (early forms very similar to late forms)
      • ca.1/3rd larger than H habilis and H rudolfensis
  • Could scavenging really have brought about a change of this magnitude?
brain size vs gastrointestinal tract
Brain size vs. gastrointestinal tract
  • H. erectus = 27-62% increase in brain size compared to early H
  • Earlier species had funnel shaped rib cages and pot bellies like living apes
  • H. erectus = probably first hominid type to show a barrel-shaped thorax and a distinct waist similar to modern humans
    • significant decrease in size of gastrointestinal tract
mass specific organ metabolic rates in humans
Mass-specific organ metabolic rates in humans
  • Brain: mass specific metabolic rate c.9x average rate for body
  • Liver/gastrointestinal tract: mass specific metabolic rate c.9.8x average rate for body
  • 2 ways to accommodate the increased energy demands of the large brain of HE:
    • raise the overall basal metabolism rate of the body or
    • compensate for brain growth by reducing the size of another metabolically expensive organ
organ weights

Brain

Brain

Gut

Gut

Organ weight in grams

Liver

Liver

Kidney

Kidney

Heart

Heart

Observed human organ weights in comparison to expected weights for a mammal our size

Organ weights

Humans = same standard basal metabolism rate for mammals our size

but we have much bigger brains and smaller gastrointestinal tracts than expected

The energetic savings from reducing the digestive system c. = added cost of larger brain

 beginning w. HE, humans experienced an evolutionary trade off of intestines for brains

dietary implications
Dietary implications:
  • By hunting H. erectus accessed energy rich food source
  • Only hunting would have provided enough & consistent protein for this to take place
  • Surplus energy was used to feed hominin brains, which began to grow significantly

Meat

eating

Brain

enlargement

clever ways to

obtain more meat

slide22

How did they hunt?

  • Methods to study early hominin behaviour

A

Living system

in the present

D

Living system

in the past

A

Kalahari hunter

& gatherer

Behaviour

(ethnographic

observation)

D

Prehistoric hunter

& gatherer

behaviour

(archaeological

observation)

B

Contemporary

“fossil record”

C

Fossil record

B

Material and

organic debris

of hunters

and gatherers

C

Archaeological

record

(excavation)

Analogue from present to past

how did they hunt
How did they hunt?
  • African hare: quick but vulnerable
    • when the hare is about to dodge, it lays its ears all the way back
    • seeing this hunter veers L or R (50% chance of being right)
    • if hunter guessed wrong, the hare will usually run for cover and stay there without moving
    • primates highly developed colour vision will see through the camouflage
slide24

How did they hunt?...persistence hunting

  • Insight into animal behaviour: e.g. antelopes and gazelles move in an arc when trying to escape
  • key = persistence, keep it in constant motion until exhaustion
    • Tarahumara Indians of Mexico: pursued a deer for 2 days. Never loose track of its spoor
  • Supported by H. erectus anatomy:
    • Barrel shaped rib cages:  high levels of sustained activity. Ventilation of the lungs = enhanced by the ability to raise the upper part of the rib cage (enlarging the thorax) when taking deep breaths
    • Waist allows upper body to twist at the abdomen and arms to swing freely –stabilises upper body in B. running
    • Human leg muscles capable of producing large forces
slide25

How did they hunt?... stalking, driving & ambush

  • Chimps do it
  • Torralba and Ambrona (Spain, 400kya, Acheulean) H. erectus hunters driving elephants, horses, deer & rhinos into marshy bogs, killing them & butchering them
  • Reanalysis (Klein & Shipman 1980’s) hominins (H. erectus/ heidelbergensis) used some of the carcasses (cut marks), no conclusive evidence of actual hunting
    • ? scavenging the remains of animals that had died naturally or killed by carnivores
  • 1st confirmed driving/ambush  La Cotte de St. Brelade (Jersey): mammoth and rhino drives (240kya-125,kya). H. heidelbergensis
cannibalism
Cannibalism
  • Zoukoudian: human skulls – faceless & had been opened at the base
  • ? cannibalism - eating the brains of the dead
  • a lack of ‘humanity’ or culture (spiritual notion that cannibalism could increase their powers)
  • cannibalism in recent times: the act is nearly always carried out as a ritual not for food
  • Distinction between dietary and ritual cannibalism = extremely important: its very rare for people to eat other people merely for food
slide27

Cannibalism

but,…

  • Lewis Binford: hominin remains are found in deposits containing many other bone fragments, including numerous predators (e.g. Chinese hyena)
  • The removal of the faces/ destruction of the skull base = what happens when gnawing carnivores chew out the face of their prey
  • Fossils disappeared in WWII
slide28

Cannibalism

  • Middle awash in Ethiopia:– (Tim White)
    • curious marks on the skull of H. erectus: forehead of the individual and around and inside the left eye socket
    • ? scalping & removing tissue from the face
  • Why would another hominid have done such a thing?
  • Whether it remains cannibalism, head hunting, or some other behaviour remains a mystery at present
  • Indicates developed culture
slide29

Conclusion

  • Nomadic - following migrating herds = problems: transporting food and water
  • No direct evidence
  • ? bags made of animal hides; containers made of wood, leaves, clay?
  • Material for toolmaking - probably transported, tools often made at the butchery site
  • Cooler climates may have stimulated the control/use of fire and the construction of clothing (animal pelts, e.g. Terra Amata: bedding)
  • All these behaviours can be related to meat eating
  • Put an even higher premium on continued and better access to meat