Harness: Framework of the Day

1. Harness: Framework of the Day Vaidy Sunderam CCGSC : Sep 26, 2000

2. Emulating Parallel Environments in HarnessM. Migliardi, S. Schubiger, T. Tyrakowski & Vaidy SunderamEmory University Harness is a joint research project at Emory University, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and the University of Tennessee Research supported by U.S. DoE MICS

3. What is Harness? • Experimental metacomputing system • dynamically reconfigurable • both resources enrolled and services offered • object-oriented • based on components/opaque interfaces • So what? • Easily incorporate new technologies • Solution to obsolescence • Adapt environment to application, not vice-versa e.g. programming environments

4. Research Focii • Distributed pluggability as a run-time configurable, dynamic implementation of the distributed component based programming environment • Supporting different (and mixed) programming paradigms on demand, via distributed components • Issues in design and development of software backplane enabling runtime reconfiguration, status tracking and management

6. Harness Prototype • Current prototype of the software backplane • Portable (Java based) • Extensible (component based) • Dynamic (event driven) • The backplane has been successfully tested as the basis to build, manage, use and dismantle Distributed Virtual Machines

7. Backplane API and services • Standards • Java and RMI for backplane and core services • Standard, OO, portability (esp. for baseline services), integrate with native code • The backplane enables the loading and unloading of additional services • a Harness service is a component offering a well defined interface to other components • Backplane allows querying the DVM status

8. Plugins: Overview public interface H_plugin { public String getInterfaceType(); public String getInterfaceDescriptor(); } • Interface type: • RMI • CORBA • SOCKETS • UNKNOWN Interface descriptor: additional info (for example port no.).

9. Plugin Execution

10. Plugin Handles //host_name/DVM_name.plugin.instance • host_name is the name of the physical machine on which the plugin is loaded • DVM_name is the name of the Harness distributed virtual machine, which the plugin is part of • plugin is the fully qualified name of the plugin class, for example • edu.emory.mathcs.harness.H_INotifierImpl • instance is the ordinal number of the plugin - many plugins may be loaded on the same machine, even multiple instances of the same plugin are allowed, so to differentiate those instances each plugin loaded has a natural number assigned (those numbers are unique only within one Harness kernel).

11. Qualities of Service • All or none vs. Best Effort • fails if any fails • fails if all fail • Guaranteed completion vs. Guaranteed Execution • returns to the user when operation is committed • returns to the user when operation is completed • All four combinations are valid QoS

12. Components Availability • The whole DVM acts as a source for class files and libraries • A set of trusted repositories can be searched for classes and libraries • The set of repositories can be extended or shrunk at run-time • Each computational resource can set a different policy for classes and libraries retrieval

13. Computational Resources Consistency • Baseline is checked to enroll in a DVM • The baseline of a DVM is • The services needed to generate, process and exchange events • The services needed to dynamically load new services • The services that are included in the baseline cannot be changed at runtime

14. Component Consistency • Naming • pluggable mapper components can be used to build user defined naming policies • common fallback name space • Versioning • every component loaded in a DVM is checked for a version signature • Synchronization • the loading of every component is synchronized

15. Framework Architecture • Kernel • delivers baseline services on the local computational resource • provides an address space for components • keeps a local copy of the DVM status • DVM Server • guarantees total ordering of events • saves the state of crashed kernels • discovers the presence of kernels willing to join • if multicast discovery is used

16. Plug-in interaction methods • Harness defines different methods to interact with plug-ins • RMI over JRMP • stream level message passing • CORBA (Work in progress) • support for plug-in specific proxy (work in progress) • The set is rather open ended as it allows plug-in specific, user developed protocols

17. Additional base services • The basic distribution of the backplane provides also some basic services • Event distribution • Subscription/notification model, both synchronous and callback oriented with guaranteed order • Message passing • p2p, reliable, ordered • reliable (not atomic) multicast and broadcast • Repositories management • Unix-like Process Spawning • An example Computational Resource Mapper

18. Distributed Components Programming • Component based programming is the native programming model for Harness in the Emory implementation • Reusable, run-time configurable simulation framework • Proof of concept • Successfully tested tested on the problem of crystal growth • Demonstrated at SC98, SC99

19. Harness Compatibility Suites • Supporting different programming paradigm such as message passing by means of sets of ad-hoc plug-ins (compatibility suites) • PVM compatibility suite as a proof of concept • Designed to allow execution of unchanged, unaware PVM apps on top of Harness • testing in progress • beta release available…soon

20. PVM C-Suite Design Goals • to require no changes into PVM applications to run in the new environment • to minimize the amount of changes to be inserted in the application side PVM library • only 1 change necessary due to Java limitation • to achieve a modular design for the services provided by the PVM daemon • to open a transition path to PVM users • verify/test Harness model and capability

21. Harness PVMD • Generic plugins • Event notifier, even poster • Process spawner • Point-to-point communications • PVMD-specific plugin • Harness-side liaison • Application-side (libpvm3.a side) liaison • Housekeeping classes • Multithreaded for asynchrony

22. Harness PVMD Architecture

23. PVMD-specific plugin • Application interface classes • Messages (applications)  classes (Harness) and (remote/local) method invocation • Daemon-interface (RMI-based) • PVMD  PVMD control exchanges • PVMD  Master PVMD interactions • Event handling system • Libpvm recompilation … • … needed to force INET sockets locally

24. Harness-PVM Benefits • As is: • The capability to soft install native libraries and executables via Harness repositories • Reliable, ordered delivery of PVM notifications and Harness status tracking/management • Performance: almost on par with native PVM • Future • Customizable PVMD modules (e.g. networks) • Access to distributed objects from PVM; mix PVM message passing with other paradigms

25. JavaSpaces in Harness • JavaSpace • Unifies communication, coordination, sharing • JS holds “entries” (instances of classes implementing Entry interface) • Templates used to match entries associatively • Operations on a JS • write : place entry in JS • read, readIfExists, take, takeIfExists • notify, snapshot

26. Harness JS Implementation • Architecture

27. Harness JS (contd.) • Interface • Jspace class : front end to send and receive requests to/from the Store class • Store • process() method: read/take requests serviced or queued (invoking process blocks) • put() method: insert new entry into JS • hash-based retrieval of entries

28. Harness JS (contd.) • Store Interceptor • Pluggable consistency/coherence subsystem • Replicated implementation used in prototype

29. Harness JS(contd.) • Token ring implementation of groups • Performance: • Simulated JS operations on matrix object • Compared to Sun outrigger implementation on Sun U10 workstations on 100Mb Ethernet • One node writing; 10 reading/taking • write: 2x improvement over SunJS • read: 4x - 7x improvement • take: 0.15x degradation

30. Harness Status • Dynamically Pluggable Java Backplane • Multiple ways to interact with plug-ins • Emulation of multiple parallel programming environments • Software: • Alpha: http://www.mathcs.emory.edu/harness/ • Release 1.0 during Fall 2000 • Alternative approach to Metacomputing