“The Politics of Same-Sex Marriage in Canada and the US”. Miriam Smith PS: Political Science and Politics April 2005; 38, 2. Method. Method: Historical Institutionalist Account
PowerPoint Slideshow about '' - moira
An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Historical Institutionalist argue that policy develops over time, and that policy options are largely shaped by political institutions. It is differences in the institutional aspects of US and Canada politics that explain diverging laws on SSM.
In the US, SSM has been banned. In Canada, after three court ruling in the provinces, and a Supreme Court of Canada decision in support of SSM, has “led to proposed federal legislation legalizing SSM.”
Canada and SSM:
In Canada, the rights of GLBT have been greatly expanded over the last decade.
US and SSM:
“In many jurisdictions, it is legal to discriminate against lesbians and gays in areas such as employment and housing…”
US and Canada Similar: Share Culture, language and Social Movement History
The two countries have a share a common history, language, culture, legal roots, religious heritage. They also both experienced social change in the 1960s, and each saw the advent of a gay and lesbian social movement.
In the US, discrimination against Gays and Lesbians has been sanctioned by laws outlawing sodomy. Canada legalized sodomy as part of the “1969 law reforms” which sought to modernize Canadian family law.
As a result, SSM has been regarded as a moral issue, as opposed to in Canada where it is viewed as a “human right.”