slide1 n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Conclusion PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Conclusion

Loading in 2 Seconds...

  share
play fullscreen
1 / 1
Download Presentation

Conclusion - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

mitch
164 Views
Download Presentation

Conclusion

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Think It’s Impossible To Find Cost-Effective Screencasting Software? SayALOHA!To Three Free Programs & Their Applications In Library Instruction Objective To compare and contrast three popular free screencasting programs and their effectiveness in delivering library instruction to remote users. Methods • Identified three free screencasting programs to evaluate and created a variety of library tutorials with each. • Screencast software and resulting tutorials were then ranked by librarians on a scale of 1 to 5 with 5 being the highest rank. • Each tool was ranked based on the following criteria: • Ease of use in creating and using screencast software • Maximum video run time provided by software • Ease of software installation • Accessibility and quality of vendor technical support • Audio & video clarity • Ability for Interactivity with or feedback from users Conclusion Of the three screencasting programs tested, Screencast-o-Matic was clearly the best option for our use. Unsolicited feedback from our users supports our conclusion. Contact Us Alan T. Williams: s2atwill@vcu.eduor 804.828.1592Kristine M. Hughes: kmhughes@vcu.edu or 804.827.1150Shannon D. Jones: sdjones@vcu.edu or 804.828.0626 Alan T. Williams, Kristine M. Hughes, & Shannon D. Jones - Tompkins-McCaw Library for the Health Sciences, VCU Libraries Comparison Criteria For More Product Information Jingwww.jingproject.com Screencast-o-Maticwww.screencast-o-matic.com Winkwww.debugmode.com/wink