1 / 20

Co-Creating Health (CCH) in NHS Ayrshire & Arran

Co-Creating Health (CCH) in NHS Ayrshire & Arran. November 2011. Ayrshire & Arran. Population of around 367,000 Geography rural towns islands >8000 people living with COPD. ISLE OF BUTE. GLASGOW. Largs. Kilmarnock. ISLE OF ARRAN. Irvine. Ayr. Girvan.

miron
Download Presentation

Co-Creating Health (CCH) in NHS Ayrshire & Arran

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Co-Creating Health (CCH) in NHS Ayrshire & Arran November 2011

  2. Ayrshire & Arran • Population of around 367,000 • Geography • rural • towns • islands • >8000 people living with COPD ISLE OF BUTE GLASGOW Largs Kilmarnock ISLE OF ARRAN Irvine Ayr Girvan

  3. Aim of CCH in Ayrshire & Arran To enable people with long term conditions to feel empowered, confident and supported to manage their condition in a way that improves their health and well being, whilst demonstrating quantifiable benefits to the healthcare system

  4. CCH Implementation • Phase 1 focus • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) • Implementation of 3 CCH workstreams • Sharing learning and experience with other CCH sites • Phase 2 focus • Developing sustainable approaches • Spread to other conditions • Evaluating impact of CCH on service utilisation • Continue to share learning and experience with other CCH sites

  5. CCH Workstreams Patient Self-Management Programme Clinician Advanced Development Programme Service Service Improvement Programme ‘White light’

  6. Clinician Development Phase 1 • Advanced Development Programme (ADP) • Identified challenges to recruitment and sustainability • 3 x 4 hour sessions – time constraints • Format of ADP – inflexible and not locally relevant • Required Facilitator input unsustainable • Local geography Phase 2 • Alternative clinician training options developed • Flexible, accessible, integrated, affordable, for example; • eLearning module • Integrated into routine AHP and Nurse study days • Practice Based Small Group Learning (PBSGL)

  7. Clinician Development

  8. Patient Self-Management Programme Phase 1 • Original CCH Condition-specific (COPD)Self-Management Programme (SMP) • 7 x 3-hour group sessions delivered in consecutive weeks • Co-delivery by trained clinician and lay person • Identified challenges to recruitment, retention & sustainability • Recruitment to be systematic, routine part of care • Retention rate around 60% - how to improve this? • Group approach not for everyone? • Inefficiency of condition-specific model for spread to other long term conditions • External tutor training and revalidation unaffordable in longer term

  9. Patient Self-Management Programme Phase 2 • Aim to develop flexible, accessible, integrated, affordable and sustainable options • ‘Moving on Together(MoT) - local patient self-management toolkit developed and introduced • Exploring alternatives to group approach e.g. patient workbook, buddy scheme

  10. Patient Self-Management Programmes • Total number registered = 284 • Total number started programme= 256 • Total number completed programme = 156 • Completion rate = 61%

  11. Service Improvement Focus on integrating three core processes (‘enablers’) into systems to support patient self-management

  12. Service Improvement Examples • Agenda setting prompt on appointment letters • Agenda setting sheets • Goal setting aids • Clinician 6 A’s prompt sheet • Telephone follow-up • Shared communication from Consultant to GP and patient • Integration of 3 enablers in pulmonary rehab pathway paperwork • Electronic prompt in GP IT system

  13. Service Improvement Examples

  14. Impact of Service Improvements • 10 patients per month asked to answer 4 questions following consultation with a clinician who has participated in the CCH clinician development programme • Do you have sufficient information to manage your condition? • Do you feel supported to manage your condition? • Are you able to make decisions affecting your condition? • How confident do you feel in managing your condition on a scale 1-10?

  15. Impact of Service Improvements • Patient survey results from 5 teams who have made service improvements to support self-management

  16. Successes • High level engagement from outset and continued support • Fit of CCH with national and local priorities has been beneficial • Opportunities taken to integrate CCH with other related initiatives and in organisational systems/processes • Range of clinicians from primary and secondary care completed clinician programme • Patient feedback and stories demonstrate benefits and improved relationship with clinician • Developed sustainable clinician development training options • Developed local patient programme that can be easily extended to other long term conditions • Engagement with other conditions in CCH2 – Heart Disease, Diabetes, Parkinson’s

  17. Challenges • Culture change needs continued effort • Gaining engagement from clinicians who consider they ‘already do’ supported self-management or who are sceptical of it • Implementing CCH as integrated model • Improving retention rates for patient programme • Alternative options to group approach for patients • Demonstrating quantifiable benefits of CCH

  18. Key Messages • Vital to have commitment from key and influential leaders in organisation – Executive, Clinical and Managerial • Significant culture change needed – needs ongoing and collective effort • Full effect of supporting self-management not known for a number of years • Significant amount of dedicated time required for a core team to manage and implement CCH • Clinician training options need to be relevant and sufficiently flexible to gain interest and commitment • Implementing CCH within teams is preferable – shared learning and support

  19. Key Messages • Financial incentives to gain General Practice engagement helpful, but does not guarantee it • Service improvement element challenging, but integral to continuous clinical improvement - most relevance and success when improvements identified by teams themselves • Automated prompts for clinicians to refer patients to programmes are helpful • Patients more likely to participate if encouraged by their clinician • Integrating self-management support in patient pathway from diagnosis onwards most likely to have best success over time • Sustainability prospects will improve where self-management support becomes a routine part of healthcare ‘just the way we do things’

  20. Questions?

More Related