1 / 21

Designing inquiry learning into courses

Designing inquiry learning into courses. Mick Healey HE Consultant and Researcher, UK mhealey@glos.ac.uk ; www.mickhealey.co.uk. Inquiry in the sciences. Structure. Introduction - MH Examples of IBL in courses - MH Stages of IBL - MH

Download Presentation

Designing inquiry learning into courses

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.


Presentation Transcript

  1. Designing inquiry learning into courses Mick Healey HE Consultant and Researcher, UK mhealey@glos.ac.uk; www.mickhealey.co.uk

  2. Inquiry in the sciences

  3. Structure • Introduction - MH • Examples of IBL in courses - MH • Stages of IBL - MH • Activities to get students active in their learning - MH • Modes of IBL - MH • Planning how to engage your students in research and inquiry – MJ • The potential of TEL in supporting IGL -MJ

  4. Model of the inquiry process (Justice et al., 2007) Engaging a topic & building basic knowledge Taking responsibility for learning Developing a question Evaluating success Anticipating possible answers & determining relevant information Self-reflection & Self-evaluation Communicating new understandings Weighing evidence & synthesising understandings Identifying resources & gathering information Assessing information

  5. Forms of IBL IBL activities may be designed to last over different lengths of time: • A short exercise in a class, • A whole class • A whole semester course • A whole program In pairs each look at a different whole semester IBL course (pp2-4 and pp5-8). Discuss the similarities and differences

  6. IBL is a pedagogy which best enables students to experience the processes of knowledge creation Optional attributes of IBL: • Collaborative/group learning • Community involvement • Field-based activity • Resource-based learning • Multi or inter-disciplinary focus Students engaged in IBL should develop: • Critical thinking skills • The ability for independent inquiry • Responsibility for their own learning • Intellectual growth and maturity (Lee et al., 2004) IBL involves: Learning stimulated by inquiry i.e. driven by questions or research problems Learning based on a process of constructing new knowledge and understanding A student/learner/learning-centred approach with the teacher as a facilitator A move to self-directed learning The development of skills in self-reflection

  7. Stage of inquiry learning Upon successful completion of this course a student should be able to: develop a researchable question and give a rationale for its significance; choose appropriate research methods to obtain information relevant to answering the question; critically evaluate the validity and relevance of sources; communicate a coherent response to the research question and interpret the findings in a wider context; critically reflect on the learning process.

  8. Break out activity Establish 5 small groups • Each group takes one stage of inquiry learning • Identify c3 activities that you could do with your stage to develop the students’ skills in this stage • Record your activities on the chart paper – be prepared to share in plenary Allocate 15 minutes

  9. Mainstreaming undergraduate research and inquiry: discipline and department strategies “Once you have learnt how to ask questions – relevant and appropriate and substantial questions – you have learnt how to learn and no one can keep you from learning whatever you want or need to know.” Postman and Weingartner (1971, 23)

  10. Active learning suggestions In groups of 3 look at: Activities to get students active in their learning(pp9-14) (2 people) Research skill development framework (p15) and Academic literacy framework (p16) Discuss ideas which are transferable Time: 15 minutes

  11. Modes of IBL Importance of scaffolding provided by lecturer and development of independence in learner Structured – where lecturers provide an issue or problem and an outline for addressing it Guided– where lecturers provide questions to stimulate inquiry but students are self-directed in terms of exploring these questions Open– where students formulate the questions themselves as well as going through the full inquiry cycle (after Staver and Bay, 1987)

  12. Does IBL enhance student learning? Increasing evidence that shows: • enhanced academic achievement, student perceptions, process skills, analytic abilities, critical thinking and creativity (Prince & Felder, 2006) • deeper understanding, higher degree of reflection, more motivated and achievement of higher order learning (Berg et al., 2003) • higher grades, more Honours, better retention (Justice et al. 2007b)

  13. (Spronken-Smith et al. 2009)

  14. (Spronken-Smith et al. 2009)

  15. Scaffolding inquiry throughout a degree 1st year 3rd year 3rd year 2nd year 2nd year 1st year

  16. Planning your learning design • Use of learning design planners valuable for: • Achieving common understanding in development team • communicate tacit information • Sharing design more widely • Communicating design to students • As an aid to evaluation • [Brown, C (2006) Developing familiarity with learning design tools through subject analysis, Journal of Learning Design 1(2) 10-20 [http://www.jld.qut.edu.au/] • ].

  17. Inquiry planners • In pairs look at (one each): • Sheffield inquiry planner (pp17-18) • Gloucestershire inquiry planner (pp19-27) • Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each. • [10 mins]

  18. Using TEL for IGL • Digital technologies take many forms, and create opportunities for change, and support for new ways of working. However, few universities have gone far beyond the provision of technology for information, communication, and organisational transactions, to use its wider capabilities to improve the quality of the learning experience itself. • Laurillard (2008: 525) • ‘Using technology to enhance the quality of teaching is just accommodating technology to the old ways of doing things. We are adding quadraphonic sound and GPS system to a horse and cart, but its still a horse and cart’ • (Bates and Sangra, 2013: 12) Bates, AW & Sangra, A (2013) Managing technology in higher education: strategies for transforming teaching and learning, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Laurillard, d. (2008) Technology enhanced learning as a tool for pedagogical innovation, Journal of Philosophy of Education, vol42, pt3-4

  19. Using TEL for IGL 'Technology will not replace teachers, but teachers who adopt new technologies will probably replace those who don't.‘ Steve Wheeler http://steve-wheeler.blogspot.ca/2014/02/the-survival-of-higher-education-5.html • ‘ ..new technologies … create an even more critical role for the teacher, who is not simply mediating the knowledge already articulated, but is more deeply involved in scaffolding the way students think and how they develop the new kinds of skills they will need for the digital literacies’ • Laurillard (2012: 4)

  20. Using TEL for IGL • Task • TEL used to undertake the task • Process vs. Product • Resources • providing access to resources required to complete the task • Guidance • providing support to the learners

  21. Using TEL for IGL • Review the case studies from session one • Which case studies used learning technologies • How is the technology used? • Task • Resources • Guidance • [10 mins]

More Related