1 / 12

ANÁLISE DA PRODUÇÃO EM PERIÓDICOS (2004-2006) SEGUNDO NOVOS ESTRATOS

ANÁLISE DA PRODUÇÃO EM PERIÓDICOS (2004-2006) SEGUNDO NOVOS ESTRATOS. Kenneth Camargo – IMS/UERJ Cláudia Medina – IESC/UFRJ . VITÓRIA, ES – OUTUBRO 2008. MÉTODO UTILIZADO. 1. Exportação para arquivo tipo texto (ASCII) dos arquivos PDF dos cadernos de programa 2004-2006;

millie
Download Presentation

ANÁLISE DA PRODUÇÃO EM PERIÓDICOS (2004-2006) SEGUNDO NOVOS ESTRATOS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ANÁLISE DA PRODUÇÃO EM PERIÓDICOS (2004-2006) SEGUNDO NOVOS ESTRATOS Kenneth Camargo – IMS/UERJ Cláudia Medina – IESC/UFRJ VITÓRIA, ES – OUTUBRO 2008

  2. MÉTODO UTILIZADO 1. Exportação para arquivo tipo texto (ASCII) dos arquivos PDF dos cadernos de programa 2004-2006; 2. Extração dos ISSN, ano e programa dos arquivos-texto, gerando tabela; 3. Associação da tabela dos ISSN com a tabela de estratos de periódicos fornecida pela representação da área; 4. Identificação de ISSNs faltantes na tabela de referência (periódicos com diferentes ISSN por tipo de mídia); 5. Cálculo das distribuições e pontuações, utilizando-se as referências de pontos por estrato fornecida pela representação da área (100,85,70,55,30,15 e 5, de A1 a B5); 6. Estabelecimento de critério de limitação de publicação em revistas de estratos mais baixos (“trava”) segundo a distribuição geral da área: total de pontos em B4 e B5 valendo no máximo 3% da produção em pontos de A1 a B3

  3. Journals under Threat: A Joint Response from History of Science, Technology and Medicine Editors The ERIH depends on a fundamental misunderstanding of conduct and publication of research in our field, and in the humanities in general. Journals' quality cannot be separated from their contents and their review processes. Great research may be published anywhere and in any language. Truly ground-breaking work may be more likely to appear from marginal, dissident or unexpected sources, rather than from a well-established and entrenched mainstream journal. Our journals are various, heterogeneous and distinct. Some are aimed at a broad, general and international readership, others are more specialized in their content and implied audience. Their scope and readership say nothing about the quality of their intellectual content. The ERIH, on the other hand, confuses internationality with quality in a way that is particularly prejudicial to specialist and non-English language journals. (...) Such exercises as ERIH can become self-fulfilling prophecies. If such measures as ERIH are adopted as metrics by funding and other agencies, then many in our field will conclude that they have little choice other than to limit their publications to journals in the premier division. We will sustain fewer journals, much less diversity and impoverish our discipline.

  4. Obrigado! (e que Toutatis nos proteja...)

More Related