slide1 l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Winter time T-PARC planning PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Winter time T-PARC planning

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 37

Winter time T-PARC planning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 338 Views
  • Uploaded on

Winter time T-PARC planning Yucheng Song IMSG at EMC/NCEP /NOAA Zoltan Toth EMC/NCEP/NWS /NOAA http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/gmb/ens/T-PARC_IPY.html Princeville, Kauai , Hawaii 4-6 December 2007 WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM Dave Emmitt Simpson Weather Assoc.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Winter time T-PARC planning' - mike_john


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

Winter time T-PARC planning

Yucheng Song IMSG at EMC/NCEP/NOAA

Zoltan Toth EMC/NCEP/NWS/NOAA

http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/gmb/ens/T-PARC_IPY.html

Princeville, Kauai, Hawaii

4-6 December 2007

with contributions from
WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM
  • Dave Emmitt Simpson Weather Assoc.
  • Chris Doyle Meteorological Service of Canada
  • Alexander Kats Roshydromet, Russia
  • Gary Wick ESRL/NOAA, CO
  • Dehui Chen CMA
  • David Richardson ECMWF
slide3

Overview

  • Platforms planned
  • Decision making process
  • Real time parallel at NCEP
slide4

PROPOSED OBSERVING PLATFORMS

  • NOAA and NASA satellites
  • G-lV out of Japan, ~120 hrs in Jan-Feb period
    • G-IV 45,000 feet high, centering around 00z
  • C-130 – covering the mid Pacific over the same time period (USAF)
    • C-130 30,000 feet high, centering around 00z
  • P3 (or other asset)
    • East Pacific or western US (planned contribution by HMT/NOAA)
  • Enhanced Siberian network
    • Potential Roshydromet / NOAA and/or NRL contribution
  • Tibetan Plateau
    • Asian THORPEX community contribution
  • Other possible platforms (see T-PARC plan)
    • Global Hawk from Dryden
      • Contributions from NOAA UAV program
    • Rapid scan satellite data (Nakazawa-San)
      • Contributions from Japan
two types of noaa satellite programs
Two Types of NOAA Satellite Programs

Polar-orbiting Operational Environmental Satellites(POES)

Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites

(GOES)

Polar Orbiting Satellites

Geostationary Satellites

N

Fairbanks,

Data Acquisition Site

Wallops, Virginia

Wallops,

Virginia

Fairbanks,

Alaska

Wallops,

Virginia

N

Data Acquisition Sites

Subsatellite

Point

540 Mi

Equator

Equator

22,240 Mi

S

Orbit Path

S

Continuously monitors the Western Hemisphere

Each satellite covers the entire Earth twice per day

  • Same geographic image over time
  • Full image every 30 minutes
  • Northern Hemisphere imaged every 15 minutes
  • Usable images between 60°N and 60°S
  • Information is used for short-term weather forecasting and severe storm warning/tracking
  • Each orbit is 102 minutes
  • Global coverage every 12 hours with 1 satellite
  • Images are global and include the poles
  • Information is used for long-term weather forecasting and climate monitoring
slide8

PROPOSED OBSERVING PLATFORMS

Extensive observational platforms during T-PARC winter phase

allow us to track the potential storms and take additional observations

as the perturbation propagate downstream into Arctic and US continents

Day 3-4

Radiosondes

Russia

Arctic

VR

Day 5-6

Radiosondes

Tibet

CONUS

VR

D 2-3

G-IV

D 1-2

C-130

UAS

D-1

UAS

P-3

platforms planned
Platforms planned
  • G-IV Stationed in Japan

(Japan contacts: YoshioAsuma and Tetsuo Nakazawa)

  • Can reach 45,000 feet high, centered on 00Z UTC
  • Maximum range:3800 nmi
  • Maximum duration: 8 hrs 45 mins
  • Contribution from NWS WSR program
  • Backbone of the whole program
  • Requested 120 flight hours 360 dropsondes
  • ISSUES:
  • Air traffic control
  • Yokota or Misawa AFB, Japan?

(AOC contacts: Jack Parrish and Michele Finn)

c 130
C-130

C-130 out of Anchorage (USAF)

  • Can reach 35,000 feet high, centered on 00Z UTC
  • Maximum range: 1800nmi
  • Maximum duration: 10 hrs
  • Part of NCEP WSR program
russia roshydromet
Russia Roshydromet
  • Alexander Kats
  • Nina Zaitseva
  • Dr. Ivanov (Director of CAO)
  • Dr. Mikhail D. Tsyroulnikov

ISSUES: Roshydromet could not pay for the extra sondes. 

Istvan Szunyogh:

proposals for both the WMO Voluntary Cooperation Program (VCP) funding

and Wilderness Research Foundation

enhanced siberian network
Enhanced Siberian network
  • Additional 06 and 18 UTC observations from the subset of about 40 designated operational stations about 6 weeks
  • - Space and time distribution (and may be amount of additional observations on each station) will be uneven depending from the weather conditions. - They will be carried out during ten – fifteen 24-h intensive observing periods (IOPs) with 6-hrs soundings in some sensitive areas to be determined during the campaign depending from the weather conditions - Depending on geographical location of sensitive area, during each IOP about 20 of the available 40 stations will be requested (in 18-24 hrs prior to the IOP beginning) to produce two additional 06 and 18 UTC soundings.
continued
Continued
  • Expected maximum total amount of additional soundings during the campaign is 15 (IOP) x 20 (sites) x 2 (extra soundings) ~ 600 soundings.
  • Taking into account possible uneven distribution of sounding it is necessary to have on each stations consumables for some 25 additional soundings to avoid running out of consumables at any of the stations before the end of the campaign.
  • This gives us maximum amount of additional consumables to be distributed for as many as 25 (soundings) x 40 (sites) ~ 1000 soundings. Remaining consumables will be used for the regular soundings after the end of the campaign.
onr p 3
ONR P-3
  • Use DWL on P3 to profile winds below & at flight level

The ELDORA radar is provided by NCAR. The P3DWL is

provided by ONR. The two possible locations for the P3DWL

are noted as (1) or (2).

p3dwl
P3DWL

The MLX-16 coherent Doppler lidar built by LMCT

for the US Army (ARL).

scanner

Cylindrical scanner

Shown here is the scanner

as mounted in the CIRPAS

Twin Otter. The white fairing is

used to reduce aerodynamic drag

Scanner
p3dwl data description
P3DWL data Description
  • Nominal vertical domain:0 – 6 km (assumes flight level ~ 6.5 km)Line-of-sight products
  • Nominal spacing between profiles: 2 km (500m with 90 deg sector processing)
  • Vertical resolution:~ 50 meters
  • Accuracy U and V components:.05 m/s (assuming homogeneous wind field)
  • Accuracy W component:.1 m/s
  • Additional data collection capabilities: All angles within ±30 degrees of nadir All angles within ±30 degrees of flight path
  • DWL wind profiles:Buffer format, real time processing, single profile file size about 10 KB
global hawk
Global Hawk

Contacts:

NOAA

  • Gary Wick PSD/ESRL/NOAA
  • Todd Jacobs NOAA

NASA

  • David Fratello DFRC Systems engineer
  • Chris Naftel DFRC Project Manager
  • Phillip Hall OMAO/NASA

ISSUES:

  • Air traffic control
  • Lidar and dropsonde capability?
slide24

NOAA THORPEX POTENTIAL OBSERVATION SYSTEM ENHANCEMENT

FOR WINTER T-PARC (JAN 09 – MAR 09)

potential for high altitude uas availability
Potential for High Altitude UAS Availability
  • NOAA UAS program actively pursuing a joint demonstration in March 2009
    • Would utilize NASA Global Hawk with operations from NASA Dryden
    • Plans for completion of a dropsonde system by March 1
    • Potential for flights joint with studies of “atmospheric rivers”
  • Schedule is very challenging but not impossible
  • Primary hurdles
    • NOAA UAS program not yet funded
    • No formal commitment of aircraft availability from NASA
    • Potential FAA limitations on release of dropsondes from unmanned aircraft
chinese participation
Chinese participation
  • CMA contact person: Dehui Chen

chendh@cma.gov.cn

  • Jing Chen

chenj@cma.gov.cn

CAMS – Chinese Academy for Meter. Sci.

tibet observation network
TIBET OBSERVATION NETWORK
  • IMPORTANCE OF TIBET PLATEAU
    • Origin of many storm systems in the Northern Hemisphere
    • Well known important diabatic heating and dynamic forcing effects
    • Strong influence on East Asia jet stream and downstream weather
  • HOW THE DATA WILL CONTRIBUTE
    • Look for possible ways to take adaptive RAOB observations

a. Fixed intensive observation periods (Jan 09 – Mar 09)

b. Adaptive observing (ETKF or other methods)

    • Optimize Chinese observational network
    • Fill data gap in the network
    • Assimilate data into different DA systems
  • PROGRESS
    • GPS sondes, profilers and an array of surface mesoscale networks
    • Which are expected to leave in place after the field phase of T-PARC
decision making
Decision Making

Communication setup (webpage and emails)

  • Identify High impact weather (HIW) events
    • Inputs from US field offices, research interest groups, Canada, Mexico in advance
  • Sensitive Area Calculations (SACs)
    • Run NCEP targeting software
    • DTS (ECMWF/UK MET OFFICE)
    • NRL targeting and others?
  • Select tracks and stations
    • Fixed tracks for easier air traffic control?
    • Flexible tracks (UAV)?
    • Siberia/Tibet Plateau stations
  • Decisions sent out
    • 18-36 hours ahead of time
    • Flexibility of change with 24 hours notification
canada and mexico
Canada and Mexico

Contacts:

  • Chris Doyle (Canada)
  • Ricardo Prieto González (Mexico) <rprieto@tlaloc.imta.mx>
  • Juan M. Caballero (Mexico)

jmcaballero@semar.gob.mx

contribution from mexico
Contribution from Mexico
  • Extra-Rawinsondes (if expendable material is provided)
  • Ensemble evaluation for the Mexican region
  • At least one meteorologist volunteering in operational activities
plans for real time parallel at ncep
Plans for real time parallel at NCEP
  • Data denial experiment
    • T126 control and operational experiments
  • Impact:
    • Conventional metrological fields, differences display alongside the operational forecast and analysis
  • Verification:
    • Post field program period
    • Legacy programs (Fit to obs, fit to analysis, scores)

KEY ISSUE: T-PARC identity BUFR headers

small uav
Small UAV

Contacts:

  • Gary Wick PSD/ESRL/NOAA
  • Todd Jacobs NOAA
  • John Porter U of Hawaii

ISSUES:

  • Which UAV to choose?
  • Air traffic control
  • How to allocate the funds for UAV and P3?
slide36

NOAA THORPEX POTENTIAL OBSERVATION SYSTEM ENHANCEMENT

FOR WINTER T-PARC (JAN 09 – MAR 09)