IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs ) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ieee 802 15 working group for wireless personal area networks wpans n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs ) PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs )

play fullscreen
1 / 12
IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs )
90 Views
Download Presentation
mika
Download Presentation

IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs )

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) SG3a Down Selection Subcommittee Closing Report Mary DuVal, TI and Ian Gifford, Consultant

  2. Contents • Down Selection Decision Summary • Scoring Discussion Mary DuVal, TI and Ian Gifford, Consultant

  3. Down Selection Process Red = Winner straw poll • Options Considered with Straw Poll Results • Separate Evaluation/Down Selection Voting: 42 • Evaluation is the Down Selection Voting (combined) : 3 • Down Selection Voting only: 0 • Abstain: 14 Mary DuVal, TI and Ian Gifford, Consultant

  4. Evaluation Process • Evaluation is Really 2 discussions (or phases) • Criteria Importance Level • Mandatory/Optional • ABC • A: Mandatory requirement • B: Important desired requirement • C: A nice to have requirement • Weighted values (0 – 10) • None • Scoring • Pass/Fail • Pugh Matrix • Better (+), Same, Worse (-) than a Baseline Solution • Rating (n > 2) • None Mary DuVal, TI and Ian Gifford, Consultant

  5. Evaluation ProcessOptions Matrix Scoring Mary DuVal, TI and Ian Gifford, Consultant

  6. Evaluation Process Grey = Voted off the straw poll Red = Winner straw poll Mary DuVal, TI and Ian Gifford, Consultant

  7. Criteria Importance Level Results Mary DuVal, TI and Ian Gifford, Consultant

  8. Criteria Importance Level Results (cont.) Mary DuVal, TI and Ian Gifford, Consultant

  9. Down Selection Voting Procedure Red = Winner straw poll Options Considered with Straw Poll Results • Ranking vote (lowest rank voted off): 2 • Vote for desired proposal (lowest # of votes is off): 14 • 2 staged vote (eliminate low support proposals, vote for desired proposal): 22/32 • Two votes per voting member (lowest number off): 18/21 • Abstain: 5/5 Mary DuVal, TI and Ian Gifford, Consultant

  10. Down Selection Procedure Activity • Ad-Hoc group met Tuesday evening to develop proposed text for sub-committee • Sub-committee reviewed on Thursday, just prior to this presentation (update in minutes of this session) Mary DuVal, TI and Ian Gifford, Consultant

  11. Scoring Discussion • Document scoring method in Annex for inclusion in IEEE P802.15-02/105 Alternate PHY Selection Criteria • Next Decisions • Extent of Scoring: tabulated information vs. tabulated information with committee analysis • Criteria to Score: only most important (A’s only) vs. all criteria • Definition of N > 2 Rating • ++ / + / 0 / - / -- • Far Exceeds / Exceeds / Meets / Not Meet / Unacceptable • + / 0 / - • Unacceptable / Acceptable / Superior Mary DuVal, TI and Ian Gifford, Consultant

  12. Thank you to everyone for driving towards solid decisions!!!! Mary DuVal, TI and Ian Gifford, Consultant