1 / 124

"Web" Unwelcome and Distorted Filtering of Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W Written Publications Pertaining to Audrie's Law

The Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) regrets to inform members of the general public/representatives of the media (who may follow its work) that unknown others were very much eager to distort Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W written content pertaining to [1] the sexual assault Audrie Taylor Pott was victim of (on around) September 04th 2012 in the State of California; [2] Audrie Taylor Pott September 10th 2012 attempted suicide, approximately 6 (six) days after the sexual assault she was the victim of on (or around) September 04th 2012...

michaelayeleaacl13
Download Presentation

"Web" Unwelcome and Distorted Filtering of Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W Written Publications Pertaining to Audrie's Law

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. APPENDIX A.

  2. 1/31/24, 7:23 AM Gmail - Public Records Act (PRA) Appeal Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> Public Records Act (PRA) Appeal Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> To: taby.kalami@cco.sccgov.org, mona.williams@cco.sccgov.org, adacoordinator@scscourt.org, sscivilinfo@scscourt.org, sscriminfo@scscourt.org, ssfamilyinfo@scscourt.org, hresources@scscourt.org, ssjuryinfo@scscourt.org, ssjuvinfo@scscourt.org, ADR@scscourt.org, ssprobinfo@scscourt.org, sssclaimsinfo@scscourt.org, sstrafficinfo@scscourt.org, ssweb@scscourt.org Cc: Michael Ayele <waacl1313@gmail.com>, Michael Ayele <waacl42913@gmail.com>, "Michael Ayele (W)" <waacl13@gmail.com> Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 8:32 PM W (AACL) Date.: January 30th 2024 Michael A. Ayele P.O.Box 20438 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia E-mail : waacl13@gmail.com ; waacl1313@gmail.com ; waacl42913@gmail.com Public Records Request - Application for Further Review Hello, This is Michael A. Ayele sending this message though I now go by W and I prefer to be referred to as such. I am writing this letter in response to your earlier correspondence, which I have since reviewed. As a Black man who has previously spent some time in the State of California in Calendar Year 2014, your earlier email (from January 30th 2024) gave me the impression that Santa Clara County played no role in the enactment of Audrie's Law. However, that is simply not true. While Santa Clara County was not a named "Defendant" in the judicial proceedings that took place in the Santa Clara County Superior Court, the Office of the District Attorney Jeff Rosen had issued a statement about Audrie's Law on (or around) June 24th 2014. That statement reads as follows: "I am thankful that the Assembly Public Safety Committee unanimously passed Senate Bill 838 ‘Audrie’s Law’ out of committee this morning. Audrie’s Law modernizes the consequences for those who sexually assault intoxicated, incapacitated, and handicapped victims. The Santa Clara County District Attorney’s Office stands alongside the Pott Family and State Sen. Jim Beall in their efforts to create positive and reasonable changes from the pain of Audrie’s tragedy. I am hopeful that the entire California Legislature will keep the 15-year-old girl’s memory close in their hearts and her legacy in mind when Audrie’s Law is presented for a final vote." If you wish, you can access the uniform resource locator (URL) of that statement here.: https://countyda. sccgov.org/da-rosen-urges-passage-audries-law Furthermore, the Santa Clara County District Attorney is explicitly mentioned (as a 'source') by the legislative branch of the California government in the text of Senate Bill 838 (also known as Audrie's Law). Please see here.: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/13-14/bill/sen/sb_0801-0850/sb_838_cfa_20140826_121631_sen_floor.html Based on the statements made by the Santa Clara County District Attorney as well as the legislative branch of California's government, I continue to have concerns with the thoroughness of the search you have performed. In my judgment, the statements made by the Santa Clara County District Attorney and the California legislature suggest that they had access to all documents related to the Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No.: 1 – 13 – CV – 244689. The statements also suggest that the Santa Clara County District Attorney and the California legislature have had conversations (in writing and verbally) about Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No.: 1 – 13 – CV – 244689 alongside the American Association of University Women - California, the Association of Regional Center Agencies, the California District Attorneys Association, the California Police Chiefs Association, the California Protective Parents Association, the Counseling and Support Services for Youth Crime Victims United of California, the Arc of California and the United Cerebral Palsy California. Your processing of my PRA doesn't really bolster public confidence in the activities, the engagements and the priorities of Santa Clara County because the wrongful death complaint, which had been assigned Case No.: 1 – 13 – CV – 244689 is a matter of public record (alongside all other documents filed with that case) and should be made available to the public/representatives of the media upon request. For the purpose of bolstering public confidence in the activities, the engagements and the priorities of the Santa Clara https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-a:r-6463890320601174969&simpl=msg-a:r-64638903206011… 1/7

  3. 1/31/24, 7:23 AM County government, I hope you will answer the following questions. Gmail - Public Records Act (PRA) Appeal 1) Is it your testimony that the Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen did not have access to the wrongful death complaint assigned by the Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No.: 1 – 13 – CV – 244689 at the time he issued the June 24th 2014 statement mentioned above? Is it your testimony that the Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen did not have access to the wrongful death complaint assigned by the Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No.: 1 – 13 – CV – 244689 when dealing with members of California's legislature and other stakeholders to have Audrie's Law enacted by the California government? 2) Is it also your testimony that the Santa Clara County District Attorney does not keep copies of the wrongful death complaint (and related documents), which was assigned by the Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No.: 1 – 13 – CV – 244689 (in the event members of the general public/representatives of the media wish to examine them)? 3) Does the Santa Clara County Counsel have access to files maintained by the Santa Clara County District Attorney? Has the Santa Clara County Counsel reached out to the Santa Clara County District Attorney to see if they'd be able to provide copies of documents related to the Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No.: 1 – 13 – CV – 244689 after I submitted my PRA request? If yes, can you provide the discussions you have had with the Santa Clara County District Attorney? 4) Even if the Santa Clara County District Attorney did not maintain copies of the wrongful death complaint (and related documents) filed in the Santa Clara County Superior Court during the processing of Case No.: 1 – 13 – CV – 244689, could the Santa Clara County Counsel not request these documents to the Santa Clara County Superior Court and provide them to members of the general public/representatives of the media who wish to review them? In the event you are either unable or unwilling to answer my questions, I hope you will perform a de novo review of my PRA request for responsive records detailing [1] the documents Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen has/had access to pertaining to Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No.: 1 – 13 – CV – 244689 prior/after the enactment of Audrie's Law (on or around) September 30th 2014; [2] the written/verbal agreements concluded between the Santa Clara County Counsel and the Santa Clara County District Attorney in terms of the Santa Clara County Counsel being given access to files maintained by the Santa Clara County District Attorney; [3] the written/verbal agreements concluded between the Santa Clara County Counsel and the Santa Clara County Superior Court in terms of the Santa Clara County Counsel being given access to files maintained by the Santa Clara County Superior Court. I do hope you reconsider your response in a manner that will bolster public confidence in the activities, the engagements and the priorities of your local government. Be well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti-Propaganda Journalist On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 7:19 PM Kalami, Taby <taby.kalami@cco.sccgov.org> wrote: Dear Mr. Ayele: The County of Santa Clara (County) has conducted a thorough search in response to your California Public Records Act (CPRA) request dated December 19, 2023, and your follow-up request dated January 27, 2024, requesting: [1] the wrongful death complaint that had been filed on behalf of Audrie Taylor Pott in the Santa Clara County Superior Court, which ended up being assigned Case No.: 1 - 13 – CV – 244689; [2] the terms and conditions of the non-monetary settlement agreement, which was concluded in the wrongful death complaint that had been assigned by the Santa Clara County Superior Court the following Case No.: 1 – 13 – CV – 244689. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-a:r-6463890320601174969&simpl=msg-a:r-64638903206011… 2/7

  4. 1/31/24, 7:23 AM Gmail - Public Records Act (PRA) Appeal The County disclosed all non-exempt responsive documents on January 26, 2024. Case 1-13-CV-244689 is a civil action between private parties, and the County was not a party to the proceeding. Thus, there are no documents “…containing information relating to the conduct of the public’s business prepared, owned, used, or retained…” by the County. (Cal. Gov’t Code § 7920.530.) The County now considers your request closed. Thank you, Taby Kalami | Deputy County Counsel Office of the County Counsel, County of Santa Clara 70 West Hedding Street, East Wing, 9th Floor | San José, CA 95110 Office: (408) 299-5917 | Facsmile: (408) 292-7240 taby.kalami@cco.sccgov.org | counsel.sccgov.org NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: The information in this email is confidential and may be protected by the attorney-client and/or work product privileges. If you received this email in error, any review, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of it is strictly prohibited. Please notify Administration, Office of the County Counsel, of the error immediately at 408-299-5900 and delete this communication and any attached documents from your system. From: Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2024 7:05 PM To: Kalami, Taby <taby.kalami@cco.sccgov.org>; Williams, Mona <mona.williams@cco.sccgov.org>; adacoordinator@scscourt.org; sscivilinfo@scscourt.org; sscriminfo@scscourt.org; ssfamilyinfo@scscourt.org; hresources@scscourt.org; ssjuryinfo@scscourt.org; ssjuvinfo@scscourt.org; ADR@scscourt.org; ssprobinfo@scscourt.org; sssclaimsinfo@scscourt.org; sstrafficinfo@scscourt.org; ssweb@scscourt.org Cc: Michael Ayele <waacl1313@gmail.com>; Michael Ayele (W) <waacl13@gmail.com>; Michael Ayele <waacl42913@gmail.com> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Public Records Act (PRA) Appeal W (AACL) Date.: January 27th 2024 Michael A. Ayele P.O.Box 20438 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia E-mail: waacl13@gmail.com ; waacl1313@gmail.com ; waacl42913@gmail.com Public Records Act (PRA) Request Appeal Hello, I am writing this letter in response to your earlier correspondence, which I have since reviewed. Please be advised that I have concerns with the thoroughness of the search you have performed for my California Public Records Act (PRA) request. One of my major concerns with your correspondence from earlier is because of your failure to disclose any records related to [1] the wrongful death complaint that had been filed on behalf of Audrie Taylor Pott in the Santa Clara County Superior Court, which ended up being assigned Case No.: 1 - 13 – CV – 244689; [2] the terms and conditions of the non-monetary settlement agreement, which was concluded in the wrongful death complaint that had https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-a:r-6463890320601174969&simpl=msg-a:r-64638903206011… 3/7

  5. 1/31/24, 7:23 AM been assigned by the Santa Clara County Superior Court the following Case No.: 1 – 13 – CV – 244689. Via email dated October 02nd 2023, the Santa Clara County Counsel had disclosed court documents that had been filed in the Superior Court of the State of California in the matter of People of the State of California v Brock Allen Turner. However, no such documents were produced during the processing of my PRA request, which I had submitted to Santa Clara County on (or around) December 19th 2023. Gmail - Public Records Act (PRA) Appeal For the purpose of bolstering public confidence in the activities, the engagements and the priorities of the Santa Clara County Counsel, I hope you will perform a more thorough search for responsive records detailing [1] the wrongful death complaint that had been filed on behalf of Audrie Taylor Pott in the Santa Clara County Superior Court, which ended up being assigned Case No.: 1 - 13 – CV – 244689; [2] the terms and conditions of the non-monetary settlement agreement, which was concluded in the wrongful death complaint that had been assigned by the Santa Clara County Superior Court the following Case No.: 1 – 13 – CV – 244689. I hope you reconsider your response. Be well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti-Propaganda Journalist From: Kalami, Taby <taby.kalami@cco.sccgov.org> Date: Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 12:52 AM Subject: RE: Public Records Act Request Response To: waacl13@gmail.com <waacl13@gmail.com> Dear Mr. Ayele, Attached please find non-exempt records that are responsive to your December 19, 2023 request. Personal contact information has been redacted pursuant to section 1, article 1, of the California Constitution and Government Code section 7922.000. This completes the County’s response to your request. Thank you, Taby Kalami | Deputy County Counsel Office of the County Counsel, County of Santa Clara 70 West Hedding Street, East Wing, 9th Floor | San José, CA 95110 Office: (408) 299-5917 | Facsmile: (408) 292-7240 taby.kalami@cco.sccgov.org | counsel.sccgov.org NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: The information in this email is confidential and may be protected by the attorney-client and/or work product privileges. If you received this email in error, any review, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of it is strictly prohibited. Please notify Administration, https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-a:r-6463890320601174969&simpl=msg-a:r-64638903206011… 4/7

  6. 1/31/24, 7:23 AM Gmail - Public Records Act (PRA) Appeal Office of the County Counsel, of the error immediately at 408-299-5900 and delete this communication and any attached documents from your system. From: Kalami, Taby Sent: Friday, January 12, 2024 4:20 PM To: waacl13@gmail.com Subject: RE: Public Records Act Request Response Dear Mr. Ayele, The County of Santa Clara (“County”) has identified responsive records and is currently in the process of reviewing them for any exceptions. The County anticipates updating you on the status of your request within two weeks. Thank you, Taby Kalami | Deputy County Counsel Office of the County Counsel, County of Santa Clara 70 West Hedding Street, East Wing, 9th Floor | San José, CA 95110 Office: (408) 299-5917 | Facsmile: (408) 292-7240 taby.kalami@cco.sccgov.org | counsel.sccgov.org NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: The information in this email is confidential and may be protected by the attorney-client and/or work product privileges. If you received this email in error, any review, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of it is strictly prohibited. Please notify Administration, Office of the County Counsel, of the error immediately at 408-299-5900 and delete this communication and any attached documents from your system. From: Kalami, Taby Sent: Friday, December 29, 2023 2:45 PM To: waacl13@gmail.com Subject: Public Records Act Request Response Dear Mr. Ayele: The County of Santa Clara is in receipt of your California Public Records Act (CPRA) request dated December 19, 2023, requesting: 1.Your discussions about the provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability (HIPAA) failing to prohibit (i) current/former U.S healthcare workers from expressing a verbal and/or written objections if they believe that a patient has been subjected to medical treatment that offends their https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-a:r-6463890320601174969&simpl=msg-a:r-64638903206011… 5/7

  7. 1/31/24, 7:23 AM Gmail - Public Records Act (PRA) Appeal conscience; (ii) current/former U.S healthcare workers from expressing a verbal and/or written objections if they believe that a patient has been subjected to medical treatment they consider to be discriminatory and/or racist and/or sexist; (iii) representatives of the media and/or members of the general public from requesting the personal health information (PHI) of a patient in a medical facility who may have been the victim of discrimination, racism and/or sexism; 2.The wrongful death complaint that had been filed on behalf of Audrie Taylor Pott in the Santa Clara County Superior Court, which ended up being assigned Case No.: 1 - 13 – CV – 244689; 3.The terms and conditions of the non-monetary settlement agreement, which was concluded in the wrongful death complaint that had been assigned by the Santa Clara County Superior Court the following Case No.: 1 – 13 – CV – 244689; 4.Your discussions about Audrie Taylor Pott as a Caucasian girl, (i) who was 15 (fifteen) years of age, when she was sexually assaulted on September 04th 2012; (ii) who attempted suicide 6 (six) days after her sexual assault on (or around) September 04th 2012; (iii) who was declared deceased on September 12th 2012 following her attempted suicide on (or around) September 10th 2012; vi (iv) whose suicide led the California legislature to enact Audrie’s Law on (or around) September 30th 2014; (v) whose name, image and likeness is extensively linked with Catherine Daisy Coleman in part because of the 2016 Netflix documentary entitled Audrie and Daisy; 5.Your discussions about Catherine Daisy Coleman as a Caucasian woman, (i) who was victim of a sexual assault on (or around) January 08th 2012 when she was 14 (fourteen) years of age; (ii) who was under American national microscopic scrutiny because of the January 08th 2012 sexual assault she was the victim of in the State of Missouri; (iii) attempted suicide following her very much publicized sexual assault on January 08th 2012 in the State of Missouri; (iv) who has been noted to have spent some time at Missouri Girls Town: a facility that has concluded many contracts with the Missouri Department of Mental Health (MODMH); (v) who was on (or around) January 09th 2014 noted by the State of Missouri to have been “put at substantial risk” when she was left “outside of her home in below freezing temperatures” even though she was “incapable of protecting or caring for herself;” (vi) whose suicide didn’t inspire legislative action in the State of Missouri even though it was in many ways similar to the suicide of Audrie Taylor Pott; 6.Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W as a Black man, who (i) has never denied previously being employed for the Missouri Department of Mental Health (MODMH) Fulton State Hospital (FSH) as a healthcare worker; (ii) has previously corresponded with his former employers on the subject of Catherine Daisy Coleman personal health information (PHI) upon learning of her suicide on (or around) August 04th 2020; (iii) was provided by his former employers the contractual agreements that were concluded between the MODMH and Missouri Girls Town: a facility, where Catherine Daisy Coleman was reported to have stayed in following the sexual assault she was the victim of on (or around) January 08th 2012; (iv) has had his written publications on the subject of World Suicide Prevention Day (WSPD) distorted in such a way that would give the impression that his conscience was not offended by the “investigation,” which had been launched against him between October 26th 2013 and November 21st 2013 (even though he was very much vexed by that); (v) has had his written publications on the subject of WSPD distorted in such a way that would give the impression that he has not officially demanded for the MODMH to disclose the PHI of Catherine Daisy Coleman of the time she has spent at Missouri Girls Town following the sexual assault she was victim of on (or around) January 08th 2012 (even though he has asked for that document to be made available to him); (vi) has had his written publications on the subject of WSPD distorted in such a way that would give the impression that his conscience was not shocked by the very lenient criminal charges filed by the State of Missouri on behalf of Catherine Daisy Coleman on (or around) January 09th 2014 (even though he is still very much dismayed by the way Missouri government authorities handled the sexual assault Catherine Daisy Coleman was the victim of on January 08th 2012);viii (vii) was very much annoyed to learn that his written publications on the subject of the National Council on Disability (NCD) January 30th 2018 report were being distorted on the Internet by the so-called “Web;” https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-a:r-6463890320601174969&simpl=msg-a:r-64638903206011… 6/7

  8. 1/31/24, 7:23 AM Gmail - Public Records Act (PRA) Appeal 7.Your discussions about the Missouri Department of Mental Health (MODMH) as a state government agency, which has a history of citing HIPAA for the purpose of (i) shielding their employees from criticism for the medical treatment they provide that is in reality discriminatory and/or racist and/or sexist; (ii) not providing the personal health information (PHI) of their patients/prisoners who have been subjected to medical treatment that is in reality discriminatory and/or racist and/or sexist; 8.Your discussions about the National Council on Disability (NCD) as a federal agency of the U.S government, which has on January 30th 2018 decided to recognize that sexual assault (i) “is a public health and public safety concern with far reaching implications;” (ii) “is a deeply personal violation,” which “leaves physical and emotional impacts that change the lives of victims;” (iii) causes “long term physical, psychological, and emotional effects, including depression, post-traumatic stress, thoughts of suicide, flashbacks, and sleep disorders;” 9.Your discussions about the decision of Joseph Biden / Kamala Harris White House Administration to recognize on (or around) September 09th 2022 that (i) they “are still in the early stages of learning about the conditions that can lead to suicide, including job strain or loss, serious illnesses, and financial, criminal, legal, and relationship problems;” (ii) “suicide accounts for 1 (one) of every 100 (one hundred) deaths globally;” (iii) suicide is “the second leading cause of death for Americans between the ages of 10 (ten) and 34 (thirty four).” The County of Santa Clara has designated the Office of the County Counsel as the office responsible for receiving and coordinating public records requests, and as such, I am providing an initial response to your request. Pursuant to California Government Code section 7922.535(c)(1), the County extends its time for responding to your request by an additional 14 days to search for and collect requested records from offices other than the Office of the County Counsel. The County will provide a response to your request by January 12, 2024. Thank you. Taby Kalami | Deputy County Counsel Office of the County Counsel, County of Santa Clara 70 West Hedding Street, East Wing, 9th Floor | San José, CA 95110 Office: (408) 299-5917 | Facsmile: (408) 292-7240 taby.kalami@cco.sccgov.org | counsel.sccgov.org NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: The information in this email is confidential and may be protected by the attorney-client and/or work product privileges. If you received this email in error, any review, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of it is strictly prohibited. Please notify Administration, Office of the County Counsel, of the error immediately at 408-299-5900 and delete this communication and any attached documents from your system. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-a:r-6463890320601174969&simpl=msg-a:r-64638903206011… 7/7

  9. 1/28/24, 4:27 PM SB 838 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis BILL ANALYSIS ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 838| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- UNFINISHED BUSINESS Bill No: SB 838 Author: Beall (D), et al. Amended: 8/18/14 Vote: 27 SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE : 6-0, 4/29/14 AYES: Hancock, Anderson, Knight, Liu, Mitchell, Steinberg NO VOTE RECORDED: De León SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : 7-0, 5/23/14 AYES: De León, Walters, Gaines, Hill, Lara, Padilla, Steinberg SENATE FLOOR : 35-0, 5/28/14 AYES: Anderson, Beall, Berryhill, Block, Cannella, Corbett, Correa, De León, DeSaulnier, Evans, Fuller, Gaines, Galgiani, Hernandez, Hill, Hueso, Huff, Jackson, Knight, Lara, Leno, Lieu, Mitchell, Monning, Morrell, Nielsen, Padilla, Pavley, Roth, Steinberg, Torres, Vidak, Walters, Wolk, Wyland NO VOTE RECORDED: Calderon, Hancock, Liu, Wright, Yee ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 79-0, 8/25/14 - See last page for vote SUBJECT : Crimes: sex offenses: juvenile hearing SOURCE : Santa Clara County District Attorney DIGEST : This bill reduces confidentiality protections and makes ineligible for deferred entry of judgment (DEJ) juveniles who have committed or who are alleged to have committed specified sex crimes involving an unconscious or disabled CONTINUED SB 838 Page 2 victim, as specified. Assembly Amendments remove the mandatory two-year out of home placement and the one-year sentence enhancement; and add a requirement for a juvenile who commits specified sex crimes to complete a sex offender treatment program as part of their probation. ANALYSIS : Existing law: 1.Makes it an offense for a person to willfully threaten to commit a crime which will result in death or great bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement, made verbally, in writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, is to be taken as a threat, and causes that person reasonably to be in fear for his/her own safety or for his/her immediate family's safety. 2.Makes it an offense for a person who uses a concealed camcorder, motion picture camera, or photographic camera of any type, to secretly videotape, film, photograph, or record by electronic means, another, identifiable person who may be in a state of full or partial undress, for the purpose of viewing the body of, or the undergarments worn by, that other person, without the consent or knowledge of that other person, in any area in which that other person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, with the intent to invade the privacy of that other person. 3.Provides that any person under 18 years of age who commits a crime is within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, except as specified. www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/13-14/bill/sen/sb_0801-0850/sb_838_cfa_20140826_121631_sen_floor.html 1/4

  10. 1/28/24, 4:27 PM SB 838 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis 4.Enumerates certain crimes for which a minor 14 years of age or older may be prosecuted under the general law in a court of criminal jurisdiction. 5.States, as amended by Proposition 21, an initiative statute approved by the voters at the March 7, 2000 primary election, juvenile court hearings are closed to the public, except for juvenile court hearings alleging the commission of specified felonies. The Legislature may amend Proposition 21 by a CONTINUED SB 838 Page 3 statute passed in each house by a 2/3-vote. 6.Sets forth a list of 30 offense categories, commonly referred to as "707(b) offenses," which carry a number of consequences in terms of how a minor and his/her alleged criminal act is handled in the juvenile system, including remand to adult criminal court, as specified. This bill: 1.Adds to the list of felonies, to which the public may be admitted for the juvenile court proceedings, certain sex offenses accomplished because the person is prevented from resisting due to being rendered unconscious by any intoxicating, anesthetizing, or controlled substance, or when the victim is at the time incapable, because of a disability, of giving consent, and this is known or reasonably should be known to the person committing the offense. 2.Requires the court, in cases where a minor is adjudged or continued as a ward of the court for the commission of certain sex offenses, to order the minor to complete a sex offender treatment program, if the court determines, in consultation with the county probation officer, that suitable programs are available. 3.Provides, in determining what type of treatment is appropriate, the court shall consider specified factors and any other relevant information presented. 4.States if ordered by the court to complete a sex offender treatment program, the minor shall pay all or a portion of the reasonable costs of the sex offender treatment program after a determination is made if the ability of the minor to pay. 5.Prohibits eligibility for DEJ minors charged with specified sex offenses where the victim was prevented from resisting due to being rendered unconscious by any intoxicating, anesthetizing, or controlled substance, or when the victim was at the time incapable, because of mental disorder or developmental or physical disability, of giving consent, and that was known or reasonably should have been known to the minor at the time of the offense. CONTINUED SB 838 Page 4 6.States that this bill shall be known, and may be cited as, Audrie's Law. Background This bill is the direct result of the tragic death of Audrie Pott, a 15-year-old Saratoga High student who committed suicide after she was sexually assaulted while unconscious and photos of her were disseminated electronically. Her assailants were tried as juveniles. The allegations against them were sustained and they handed down sentences of 30 to 45 days, news reports said. Despite the severity of their crimes, they are freed from having to register sex offenders due to an omission in the law. FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: Yes According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, unknown, likely minor, potentially in excess of $1 million statewide, local costs to require juvenile sex offenders to complete a sex offender treatment program, to the extent suitable programs are available and offenders are unable to pay. www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/13-14/bill/sen/sb_0801-0850/sb_838_cfa_20140826_121631_sen_floor.html 2/4

  11. 1/28/24, 4:27 PM SB 838 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis Unknown, likely minor state and local incarceration and probation costs to the extent additional offenders are excluded from DEJ. Unknown, likely minor state trial court administrative costs for opening additional juvenile cases to the public. SUPPORT : (Verified 8/25/14) Santa Clara County District Attorney (source) American Association of University Women-California Association of Regional Center Agencies California District Attorneys Association California Police Chiefs Association, Inc. California Protective Parents Association Counseling and Support Services for Youth Crime Victims United of California The Arc California The United Cerebral Palsy California OPPOSITION : (Verified 8/25/14) CONTINUED SB 838 Page 5 California Public Defenders Association Youth Law Center ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : According to the author: Senate Bill 838 is the direct result of the tragic death of Audrie Pott, a 15-year-old Saratoga High student who committed suicide after she was sexually assaulted while unconscious and photos of her were disseminated electronically. The perpetrators, according to news reports, were tried as juveniles and the allegations against them were sustained, and released after serving 30- to 45-day sentences. They are free to continue their lives, education, and careers in anonymity thanks to outdated laws after publically destroying a young women's life. The incidents surrounding Audrie's death are not isolated but reflect a disturbing trend. Her case is eerily similar to the suicide of Rehtaeh Parsons, a 17-year-old student in Canada, who suffered nearly two years of bullying as photos of her sex assault were circulated by students, and the photographed rape of an unconscious 16-year-old girl by two high school football players in Steubenville, Ohio. It should be noted that the identities of the convicted football players, both 16, were released by the juvenile court. The nature of the crimes against Audrie, coupled with the growing use of social media to bully victims, demands that our statutes and codes be amended to reflect the severity of these offenses in the 21st century to not only give justice but to act as a deterrent. ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION : Youth Law Center writes: While it is very good that S.B. 838 no longer includes the original provisions expanding transfer to adult court, adding new crimes that would disproportionately affect juveniles, and mandatory minimum terms of confinement, the provisions that are still in the bill are objectionable and not in keeping with our mission and values. The provision of S.B. 838 that would open juvenile cases to CONTINUED SB 838 Page 6 the public in cases involving certain sex offenses ignores the very reason we have a separate juvenile court system. Unlike the adult criminal system, where punishment is the stated purpose, our juvenile court law requires individualized "care, treatment and guidance" in which punishment is permitted, but the overarching purpose is rehabilitation of the young person. The expansion of open proceedings for juveniles is antithetical to those goals. Moreover, the specific expansion of open proceedings for sex offenses is troubling. Cases involving alleged sex offenses invariably involve a great deal www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/13-14/bill/sen/sb_0801-0850/sb_838_cfa_20140826_121631_sen_floor.html 3/4

  12. 1/28/24, 4:27 PM SB 838 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis of sensitive information and should not automatically be open to the public. ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 79-0, 8/25/14 AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Bigelow, Bloom, Bocanegra, Bonilla, Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian Calderon, Campos, Chau, Chávez, Chesbro, Conway, Cooley, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dickinson, Donnelly, Eggman, Fong, Fox, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gorell, Gray, Grove, Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Roger Hernández, Holden, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Linder, Logue, Lowenthal, Maienschein, Mansoor, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Nazarian, Nestande, Olsen, Pan, Patterson, Perea, John A. Pérez, V. Manuel Pérez, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Skinner, Stone, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wieckowski, Wilk, Williams, Yamada, Atkins NO VOTE RECORDED: Vacancy JG:k 8/26/14 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END **** CONTINUED www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/13-14/bill/sen/sb_0801-0850/sb_838_cfa_20140826_121631_sen_floor.html 4/4

  13. 1/31/24, 7:27 AM DA Rosen Urges Passage of Audrie's Law - Office of the District Attorney - County of Santa Clara County Services Departments About the County County of Santa Clara O?ice of the District Attorney Search... Menu  For release on June 24, 2014 DA ROSEN URGES PASSAGE OF AUDRIEʼS LAW A statement from Santa Clara County District Attorney Je? Rosen regarding the passage of ʻAudrieʼs Lawʼ out of a state legislative committee today: “I am thankful that the Assembly Public Safety Committee unanimously passed Senate Bill 838 ʻAudrieʼs Lawʼ out of committee this morning.” “Audrieʼs Law modernizes the consequences for those who sexually assault intoxicated, incapacitated, and handicapped victims. The Santa Clara County District Attorneyʼs O?ice stands alongside the Pott Family and State Sen. Jim Beall in their e?orts to create positive and reasonable changes from the pain of Audrieʼs tragedy. I am hopeful that the entire California Legislature will keep the 15-year-old girlʼs memory close in their hearts and her legacy in mind when Audrieʼs Law is presented for a final vote.” ###  Report a problem on this page  COUNTY SERVICES DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES BOARD AGENDAS, MINUTES, AND WEBCASTS VOLUNTEER OPPORTUNITIES CAREERS CONTACT US COUNTY HOLIDAYS ACCESSIBILITY LINKS POLICY PRIVACY POLICY TERMS OF USE https://countyda.sccgov.org/da-rosen-urges-passage-audries-law 1/2

  14. 1/31/24, 7:27 AM DA Rosen Urges Passage of Audrie's Law - Office of the District Attorney - County of Santa Clara ©2024 County of Santa Clara. All rights reserved. https://countyda.sccgov.org/da-rosen-urges-passage-audries-law 2/2

  15. APPENDIX B.

  16. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/20/2023 W (AACL) Michael A. Ayele P.O.Box 20438 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia E-mail : waacl13@gmail.com ; waacl1313@gmail.com ; waacl42913@gmail.com Request for Records Hello, This is Michael A. Ayele sending this message though I now go by W. You may call me W. I am writing this letter to file a request for records with your office.i The bases for this records request are [1] the decision of the California government to enact Audrie’s Law on (or around) September 30th 2014 following the September 12th 2012 suicide of Audrie Taylor Pott, thereby recognizing sexual assault as a factor that could lead a girl (below the age of 18) and/or a woman (above the age of 18) to commit suicide;ii [2] the decision of the National Council on Disability (NCD) to formally recognize sexual assault as a factor increasing the risk of suicide on (or around) January 30th 2018; iii [3] the decision of the Missouri government to remain muted on the subject of sexual violence leading to suicide even after the August 04th 2020 suicide of Catherine Daisy Coleman.iv I) Records Requested What I am requesting for prompt disclosure are records in your possession detailing [1] your discussions about the provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability (HIPAA) failing to prohibit (i) current/former U.S healthcare workers from expressing a verbal and/or written objections if they believe that a patient has been subjected to medical treatment that offends their conscience; (ii) current/former U.S healthcare workers from expressing a verbal and/or written objections if they believe that a patient has been subjected to medical treatment they consider to be discriminatory and/or racist and/or sexist; (iii) representatives of the media and/or members of the general public from requesting the personal health information (PHI) of a patient in a medical facility who may have been the victim of discrimination, racism and/or sexism;v [2] the wrongful death complaint that had been filed on behalf of Audrie Taylor Pott in the Santa Clara County Superior Court, which ended up being assigned Case No.: 1 - 13 – CV – 244689; [3] the terms and conditions of the non-monetary settlement agreement, which was concluded in the wrongful death complaint that had been assigned by the Santa Clara County Superior Court the following Case No.: 1 – 13 – CV – 244689; [4] your discussions about Audrie Taylor Pott as a Caucasian girl, (i) who was 15 (fifteen) years of age, when she was sexually assaulted on September 04th 2012; (ii) who attempted suicide 6 (six) days after her sexual assault on (or around) September 04th 2012; (iii) who was declared deceased on September 12th 2012 following her attempted suicide on (or around) September 10th 2012; vi (iv) whose suicide led the California legislature to enact Audrie’s Law on (or around) September 30th 2014; (v) whose name, image and likeness is extensively linked with Catherine Daisy Coleman in part because of the 2016 Netflix documentary entitled Audrie and Daisy;vii[5] your discussions about Catherine Date.: December 20th 2023 MICHAEL A. AYELE (A.K.A) W – ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CIVIL LIBERTIES (AACL) 1

  17. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/20/2023 Daisy Coleman as a Caucasian woman, (i) who was victim of a sexual assault on (or around) January 08th 2012 when she was 14 (fourteen) years of age; (ii) who was under American national microscopic scrutiny because of the January 08th 2012 sexual assault she was the victim of in the State of Missouri; (iii) attempted suicide following her very much publicized sexual assault on January 08th 2012 in the State of Missouri; (iv) who has been noted to have spent some time at Missouri Girls Town: a facility that has concluded many contracts with the Missouri Department of Mental Health (MODMH); (v) who was on (or around) January 09th 2014 noted by the State of Missouri to have been “put at substantial risk”when she was left “outside of her home in below freezing temperatures” even though she was “incapable of protecting or caring for herself;” (vi) whose suicide didn’t inspire legislative action in the State of Missouri even though it was in many ways similar to the suicide of Audrie Taylor Pott; [6] Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W as a Black man, who (i) has never denied previously being employed for the Missouri Department of Mental Health (MODMH) Fulton State Hospital (FSH) as a healthcare worker; (ii) has previously corresponded with his former employers on the subject of Catherine Daisy Coleman personal health information (PHI) upon learning of her suicide on (or around) August 04th 2020; (iii) was provided by his former employers the contractual agreements that were concluded between the MODMH and Missouri Girls Town: a facility, where Catherine Daisy Coleman was reported to have stayed in following the sexual assault she was the victim of on (or around) January 08th 2012; (iv) has had his written publications on the subject of World Suicide Prevention Day (WSPD) distorted in such a way that would give the impression that his conscience was not offended by the “investigation,” which had been launched against him between October 26th 2013 and November 21st 2013 (even though he was very much vexed by that); (v) has had his written publications on the subject of WSPD distorted in such a way that would give the impression that he has not officially demanded for the MODMH to disclose the PHI of Catherine Daisy Coleman of the time she has spent at Missouri Girls Town following the sexual assault she was victim of on (or around) January 08th 2012 (even though he has asked for that document to be made available to him); (vi) has had his written publications on the subject of WSPD distorted in such a way that would give the impression that his conscience was not shocked by the very lenient criminal charges filed by the State of Missouri on behalf of Catherine Daisy Coleman on (or around) January 09th 2014 (even though he is still very much dismayed by the way Missouri government authorities handled the sexual assault Catherine Daisy Coleman was the victim of on January 08th 2012);viii (vii) was very much annoyed to learn that his written publications on the subject of the National Council on Disability (NCD) January 30th 2018 report were being distorted on the Internet by the so-called “Web;”ix [7] your discussions about the Missouri Department of Mental Health (MODMH) as a state government agency, which has a history of citing HIPAA for the purpose of (i) shielding their employees from criticism for the medical treatment they provide that is in reality discriminatory and/or racist and/or sexist; (ii) not providing the personal health information (PHI) of their patients/prisoners who have been subjected to medical treatment that is in reality discriminatory and/or racist and/or sexist; [8] your discussions about the National Council on Disability (NCD) as a federal agency of the U.S government, which has on January 30th 2018 decided to recognize that sexual assault (i) “is a public health and public safety concern with far reaching implications;” (ii) “is a deeply personal violation,” which “leaves physical and emotional impacts that change the lives of victims;” (iii) causes “long term physical, psychological, and emotional effects, including depression, post-traumatic stress, thoughts of suicide, flashbacks, and sleep disorders;” [9] your discussions about the decision of Joseph Biden / Kamala Harris MICHAEL A. AYELE (A.K.A) W – ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CIVIL LIBERTIES (AACL) 2

  18. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/20/2023 White House Administration to recognize on (or around) September 09th 2022 that (i) they “are still in the early stages of learning about the conditions that can lead to suicide, including job strain or loss, serious illnesses, and financial, criminal, legal, and relationship problems;” (ii) “suicide accounts for 1 (one) of every 100 (one hundred) deaths globally;” (iii) suicide is “the second leading cause of death for Americans between the ages of 10 (ten) and 34 (thirty four).”x II) Request for a Fee Waiver and Expedited Processing The requested records do/will demonstrate that [1] the provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability (HIPAA) fail to prohibit (i) current/former U.S healthcare workers from expressing a verbal and/or written objections if they believe that a patient has been subjected to medical treatment that offends their conscience; (ii) current/former U.S healthcare workers from expressing a verbal and/or written objections if they believe that a patient has been subjected to medical treatment they consider to be discriminatory and/or racist and/or sexist; (iii) representatives of the media and/or members of the general public from requesting the personal health information (PHI) of a patient in a medical facility who may have been the victim of discrimination, racism and/or sexism; [2] Audrie Taylor Pott is a Caucasian girl, (i) who was 15 (fifteen) years of age, when she was sexually assaulted on September 04th 2012; (ii) who attempted suicide 6 (six) days after her sexual assault on (or around) September 04th 2012; (iii) who was declared deceased on September 12th 2012 following her attempted suicide on (or around) September 10th 2012;(iv) whose suicide led the California government to enact Audrie’s Law on (or around) September 30th 2014; (v) whose name, image and likeness is extensively linked with Catherine Daisy Coleman in part because of the 2016 Netflix documentary entitled Audrie and Daisy; [3] Catherine Daisy Coleman is a Caucasian woman, (i) who was subjected to a sexual assault on (or around) January 08th 2012 when she was 14 (fourteen) years of age; (ii) who was under American national microscopic scrutiny because of the January 08th 2012 sexual assault she was victim of in the State of Missouri; (iii) who attempted suicide following her very much publicized sexual assault on January 08th 2012 in the State of Missouri; (iv) who has been noted to have spent some time at Missouri Girls Town: a facility that has concluded many contracts with the Missouri Department of Mental Health (MODMH); (v) who was on (or around) January 09th2014 noted by the State of Missouri to have been “put at substantial risk” when she was left “outside of her home in below freezing temperatures” even though she was “incapable of protecting or caring for herself;” (vi) whose suicide didn’t inspire legislative action in the State of Missouri even though it was in many ways similar to the suicide of Audrie Taylor Pott whose suicide didn’t inspire legislative action in the State of Missouri even though it was in many ways similar to the suicide of Audrie Taylor Pott; [4] Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W is a Black man, who (i) has never denied previously being employed for the Missouri Department of Mental Health (MODMH) Fulton State Hospital (FSH) as a healthcare worker; (ii) has previously corresponded with his former employers on the subject of Catherine Daisy Coleman personal health information (PHI) upon learning of her suicide on (or around) August 04th 2020; (iii) was provided by his former employers the contractual agreements that were concluded between the MODMH and Missouri Girls Town: a facility, where Catherine Daisy Coleman was reported to have stayed in following the sexual assault she was victim of on (or around) January MICHAEL A. AYELE (A.K.A) W – ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CIVIL LIBERTIES (AACL) 3

  19. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/20/2023 08th 2012; (iv) has used his advocacy skills to encourage his former employers and their contractual partners to formally recognize sexual assault as a factor that increases the risk of girls/women to commit suicide; (v) has used his advocacy skills to encourage his former employers and their contractual partners to provide appropriate support for sexual violence survivors who may be considering suicide; [6] the Missouri Department of Mental Health (MODMH) is a state government agency, which has a history of citing HIPAA for the purpose of (i) shielding their employees from criticism for the medical treatment they provide that is in reality discriminatory and/or racist and/or sexist; (ii) not providing the personal health information (PHI) of their patients/prisoners who have been subjected to medical treatment that is in reality discriminatory and/or racist and/or sexist; [7] the National Council on Disability (NCD) is a federal agency of the U.S government, which has on January 30th 2018 decided to recognize that sexual assault (i) “is a public health and public safety concern with far reaching implications;” (ii) “is a deeply personal violation,” which “leaves physical and emotional impacts that change the lives of victims;” (iii) causes “long term physical, psychological, and emotional effects, including depression, post-traumatic stress, thoughts of suicide, flashbacks, and sleep disorders.” In my judgment, the facts presented in this request for a fee waiver and expedited processing are not the sort to bolster public confidence in the activities, the engagements and the priorities of the U.S government overall. As a Black man with a U.S college degree (who has previously been subjected to a racially motivated Missouri state government investigation), I would like to take this opportunity to condemn [1] violence committed against girls/women irrespective of their racial backgrounds, their sexual orientations, their national origins, their religious affiliations and/or their disability status; [2] the January 08th 2012 sexual assault Catherine Daisy Coleman was victim of in the State of Missouri; [3] the September 04th 2012 sexual assault Audrie Taylor Pott was victim of in the State of California; [4] malicious efforts to place women in circumstances encouraging the commission of suicide as a form of retaliation/punishment for speaking about an incident of sexual harassment/sexual assault and/or rape to agents of law enforcement and/or other qualified individuals; [5] the racially motivated Missouri state investigation I was subjected to between October 26th 2013 and November 21st 2013 when I was working for the Missouri Department of Mental Health (MODMH) Fulton State Hospital (FSH); [6] the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) processing of the Charge they had assigned Case No.: 28E – 2014 – 00485C. The core issues presented in this records request are as follows. 1) Have you had conversations about the provisions of HIPAA failing to prohibit current/former U.S healthcare workers from expressing a verbal and/or written objections if they believe that a patient has been subjected to medical treatment that offends their conscience? If yes, will you promptly disclose those records? 2) Have you had conversations about the provisions of HIPAA failing to prohibit current/former U.S healthcare workers from expressing a verbal and/or written objections if they believe that a patient has been subjected to medical treatment they consider to be discriminatory and/or racist and/or sexist? If yes, will you promptly disclose those records? 3) Have you had MICHAEL A. AYELE (A.K.A) W – ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CIVIL LIBERTIES (AACL) 4

  20. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/20/2023 conversations about the provisions of HIPAA failing to prohibit members of the general public / representatives of the media from requesting the personal health information (PHI) of a patient in a medical facility who may have been the victim of discrimination and/or racism and/or sexism? 4) Have you had conversations about the decision of the Missouri Department of Mental Health (MODMH) Fulton State Hospital (FSH) to subject their former employee Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W to an “investigation” (that was offensive to his conscience) on October 26th 2013 and then afterwards “clear” him of that investigation on November 21st 2013 and then afterwards not provide him with documents of that “investigation” (they had conducted on him) and then afterwards not provide him with the PHI of Catherine Daisy Coleman? If yes, will you promptly disclose those records? 5) Have you had conversations about the written publications of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W on the subject of World Suicide Prevention Day (WSPD) being distorted in such a way that would give the impression that the January 08th 2012 sexual assault Catherine Daisy Coleman was victim of did not cause her “long term physical, psychological and emotional effects, including depression, post-traumatic stress, thoughts of suicide, flashbacks and sleep disorders” even though the evidence suggests otherwise particularly given her August 04th 2020 suicide? If yes, will you promptly disclose those records? 6) Have you had conversations about the January 08th 2012 sexual assault Catherine Daisy Coleman was victim of? If yes, will you disclose those records? 7) Have you had conversations about the criminal charges that were filed by the State of Missouri on behalf of Catherine Daisy Coleman on (or around) January 09th 2014? If yes, will you promptly disclose those records? 8) Have you had conversations about the events and circumstances leading up to the August 04th 2020 suicide of Catherine Daisy Coleman following the sexual assault she was a victim of on (or around) January 08th 2012? If yes, will you disclose those records? 9) Have you had conversations about the decision of the State of Missouri not to take legislative action recognizing sexual violence as a factor increasing the risk of suicide even after what happened to Catherine Daisy Coleman in the days/weeks/months/years after January 08th 2012? If yes, will you disclose those records? 10) Have you had conversations about the decision of the State of Missouri not to take legislative action recognizing sexual violence as a factor that has the potential to increase the risk of suicide even though the State of Missouri had on January 09th 2014 filed criminal charges on behalf of Catherine Daisy Coleman, which recognized that she was on the night of January 08th2012 “put at substantial risk” when she was left “outside of her home in below freezing temperatures” even though she was “incapable of protecting or caring for herself?” If yes, will you promptly disclose those records? 11) Has your local/state government ever formulated an opinion about sexual violence as a factor that increases the risk of girls/women to commit suicide? If yes, will you disclose those records? 12) Have you had conversations about the decision of the National Council on Disability (NCD) to recognize on January 30th 2018 that sexual assault (i) “is a public health and public safety concern with far reaching implications;” (ii) “is a deeply personal violation,” which “leaves physical and emotional impacts that change the lives of victims;” (iii) causes “long term physical, psychological, and emotional effects, including depression, post-traumatic stress, thoughts of suicide, flashbacks, and sleep disorders?” If yes, will you promptly disclose those records? 13) Have you had conversations about the September 04th 2012 sexual assault Audrie Taylor Pott was victim of in the State of California? If yes, will MICHAEL A. AYELE (A.K.A) W – ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CIVIL LIBERTIES (AACL) 5

  21. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/20/2023 you disclose those records? 14) Have you had conversations about the tragic decision of Audrie Taylor Pott to attempt suicide 6 days following her traumatic sexual assault? If yes, will you disclose those records? 15) Have you had conversations about the decision of the California government to enact Audrie’s Lawon (or around) September 30th 2014, thereby recognizing sexual assault as a factor that could lead girls/women to commit suicide? If yes, will you disclose those records? 16) Have you had conversations about the wrongful death complaint that had been filed with the Santa Clara County Superior Court on behalf of Audrie Taylor Pott, which ended up being assigned Case No.: 1 - 13 – CV – 244689? If yes, will you promptly disclose those records? 17) Have you had conversations about the terms and conditions of the non-monetary settlement agreement, which was concluded following the filing of the wrongful death complaint that had been assigned by the Santa Clara County Superior Court the following the Case No.: 1 - 13 – CV – 244689? If yes, will you promptly disclose those records? 18) Have you had conversations about the decision of the Joseph Biden / Kamala Harris White House Administration to recognize on (or around) September 09th2022 that (i) they “are still in the early stages of learning about the conditions that can lead to suicide, including job strain or loss, serious illnesses, and financial, criminal, legal, and relationship problems;” (ii) “suicide accounts for 1 (one) of every 100 (one hundred) deaths globally;” (iii) suicide is “the second leading cause of death for Americans between the ages of 10 (ten) and 34 (thirty four)?” If yes, will you promptly disclose those records? This records request should be expedited because it puts into question the government’s integrity about the way that people are treated in the U.S.A on account of their gender, their racial backgrounds, their national origins and their disability status. My request for a fee waiver should be granted because [1] I have identified operations and activities of the federal government in concert with U.S local/state government; [2] the issues presented are meaningfully informative about government operations or activities in order to be ‘likely to contribute’ to and increase public understanding of those operations or activities; [3] this records request is being filed for non-commercial purposes and any records you disclose to me could be made available to the general public at no financial expense to them. Under penalty of perjury, I hereby declare that all the statements I have made to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Be well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. W (AACL) Michael A. Ayele Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti-Propaganda Journalist MICHAEL A. AYELE (A.K.A) W – ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CIVIL LIBERTIES (AACL) 6

  22. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/20/2023 Work Cited i Please be advised that I have previously disseminated a vast number of documents obtained through records request using the means of various digital publishing platforms. As a representative of the media, I would like to take this opportunity to inform you that the records you disclose to me could be made available to the general public at no financial expense to them. This records request is being filed for non-commercial purposes. As previously noted, any records you disclose to me could be made available to the general public at no financial expense to them. iiThis bill is the direct result of the tragic death of Audrie Pott, a 15-year-old Saratoga High student who committed suicide after she was sexually assaulted while unconscious and photos of her were disseminated electronically. Her assailants were tried as juveniles. The allegations against them were sustained and they handed down sentences of 30 to 45 days, news reports said. Despite the severity of their crimes, they are freed from having to register sex offenders due to an omission in the law. (…) They are free to continue their lives, education, and careers in anonymity thanks to outdated laws after publicly destroying a young woman's life. The incidents surrounding Audrie's death are not isolated but reflect a disturbing trend. Her case is eerily similar to the suicide of Rehtaeh Parsons, a 17-year-old student in Canada, who suffered nearly two years of bullying as photos of her sex assault were circulated by students, and the photographed rape of an unconscious 16-year-old girl by two high school football players in Steubenville, Ohio. It should be noted that the identities of the convicted football players, both 16, were released by the juvenile court. The nature of the crimes against Audrie, coupled with the growing use of social media to bully victims, demands that our statutes and codes be amended to reflect the severity of these offenses in the 21st century to not only give justice but to act as a deterrent. Senate Bill 838.: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/13-14/bill/sen/sb_0801- 0850/sb_838_cfa_20140826_121631_sen_floor.html iii The Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) has on December 15th 2022 expressed dissatisfaction with the National Council on Disability (NCD) processing of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request they had assigned Case No.: 2023 – 01 as a direct consequence of their failure to make clear [1] the research, which was performed by their federal agency on the subject of students with disabilities (i) being accused of sexual violence in college/university settings; (ii) being victims of sexual violence; (iii) requiring accommodations during Title IX hearings, judicial procedures, suspensions and other procedures on campus; (iv) being told about “affirmative and effective consent” in healthy sexual relations after informing them of the April 05th 1986 rape and murder Jeanne Ann Clery was a victim of; (v) being told about “affirmative and effective consent” after providing them with very limited background information on the rape and murder of a Caucasian woman (i.e: Jeanne Ann Clery) by a Black/African American man (i.e: Josoph Henry); [2] the date and time (i) representatives of the MICHAEL A. AYELE (A.K.A) W – ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CIVIL LIBERTIES (AACL) 7

  23. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/20/2023 media, (ii) members of the general public, (iii) current college students, (iv) current university students, (v) alumnae of U.S colleges/universities and (vi) alumni of U.S colleges/universities can expect a follow up report to the January 30th2018 publication of the NCD entitled “Not on the Radar: Sexual Assault of College Students With Disabilities.” Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W is an alumnus of Westminster College (located in Fulton, Missouri) who was in the month of January 2010 informed about the April 05th 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery. He is responsible for the written publications of the Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL): a non-profit organization primarily engaged in the dissemination of public records obtained from the U.S government. It is the judgment of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery continues to leave several key questions about Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 unaddressed. The questions asked by Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W about Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 include but are not limited to the following. 1) What are/were colleges/universities in the U.S.A obligations pursuant to Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? Were colleges/universities throughout the U.S.A required by law to condemn violence committed against women irrespective of their racial backgrounds, their sexual orientations, their religious affiliations and their national origins following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? If yes, were colleges/universities required to inform their students about what constitute appropriate sexual boundaries pursuant to Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? 2) Did colleges/universities throughout the U.S.A begin informing their students about what constitute “affirmative and effective consent” following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? If not, when did colleges/universities begin to inform their incoming freshmen/transfer students about the concepts of “affirmative and effective consent?” Did colleges/universities throughout the U.S.A begin teaching the concepts of “affirmative and effective consent” to their incoming freshmen/transfer students following the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery (dated April 05th 1986)? If yes, why have colleges/universities throughout the U.S.A fixated on the rape and murder of this Caucasian woman by a Black/African American man to inform their incoming freshmen/transfer students about what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent?” 3) Are colleges/universities discussions pertaining to what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent” consistent with Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 if they are first informing their incoming/freshmen students about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery? Are colleges/universities discussions pertaining to what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent” consistent with their academic integrity policy if they are first informing their incoming freshmen/transfer students about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery? 4) Were there forces out there in the 1970s and the 1980s looking for a case where a Black/African American man rapes and murders a Caucasian woman for the purpose of enacting a law similar to the Jeanne Clery Act? Was the enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act the result of racist and sexist individuals coming together for the purpose of [a] preventing racial minorities from climbing the social ladder through academic education; [b] cracking down on interracial relationships particularly between a Caucasian woman and a Black/African American man; [c] not applying the same standards in circumstances where a Caucasian man sexually assaults a woman from a racial minority (as in the case of Brock Turner and Chanel Miller following her rape on January 18th 2015 at the campus of Stanford University)? MICHAEL A. AYELE (A.K.A) W – ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CIVIL LIBERTIES (AACL) 8

  24. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/20/2023 According to the National Council on Disability (NCD), [1] “affirmative and effective consent” is being taught to college/university students of the United States of America (U.S.A) during the course of their Freshmen year, [2] college/university students are informed about “healthy sexual relationships” during the course of their 1st (first) year of post-secondary academic education; [3] 20% (twenty percent) of women were sexually assaulted in a college/university setting by the time they reached their Senior year in Calendar Year 2005; [4] 32% (thirty two percent) of women with a disability were sexually assaulted during Calendar Years 2014 and 2015 in a college/university setting; [5] sexual assault “is a public health and public safety concern with far reaching implications;” [6] sexual assault is a “deeply personal violation,” which “leaves physical and emotional impacts that change the lives of victims;” [7] sexual assault causes “long term physical, psychological, and emotional effects, including depression, post-traumatic stress, thoughts of suicide, flashbacks, and sleep disorders.” As a matter of principle, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W unequivocally condemns violence committed against women irrespective of their racial backgrounds, their sexual orientations, their national origins, their religious affiliations and/or their disability status. Affirmative and Effective Consent in Healthy Sexual Relations on American College/University Campuses. Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) Website on WordPress.: https://michaelayeleaacl.wordpress.com/2022/11/02/affirmative-and-effective-consent-in- healthy-sexual-relationships-on-college-campuses-index/ ivThe Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) has obtained limited responsive documents concerning the suicide of Catherine Daisy Coleman, which took place on August 04th 2020. Among documents that were disclosed to the AACL are contracts concluded between the Missouri Department of Mental Health (MODMH) and Missouri Girls Town: a facility, where Catherine Daisy Coleman is reported to have stayed in for a period of 90 (ninety) days before her permanent departure to the State of Colorado from the State of Missouri. According to the MODMH, Missouri Girls Town is a “time-limited placement resource for children requiring active coordinated and professional intervention in a highly structured environment by virtue of a demonstrated inability to function in any less restrictive setting. Children requiring residential treatment services exhibit a severe mental illness and/or persistent mental disorder as diagnosed according to the DSM-IV. These children may be unable to function consistently in an open, public school setting, may present a chronic runaway risk, and may present a history of showing rage, including physical aggression toward self and others.” Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W was a previous employee of the MODMH. He is also an alumnus of Westminster College (Fulton, MO). As an alumnus of Westminster College, who has previously worked for the Fulton State Hospital (a component of the MODMH), Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W doesn't know if the MODMH accept as a matter of fact the reality that sexual assault could lead a woman who has experienced it to commit suicide. Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W is very much a proponent of reviewing the personal health information (PHI) of Catherine Daisy Coleman. MICHAEL A. AYELE (A.K.A) W – ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CIVIL LIBERTIES (AACL) 9

  25. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/20/2023 Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W is very much concerned about the circumstances which led Catherine Daisy Coleman to leave the State of Missouri for the State of Colorado. Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W is also concerned about the things Catherine Daisy Coleman is reported to have gone through in the State of Colorado before her suicide on August 04th 2020. The MODMH have concluded an affiliation agreement with Westminster College. As a matter of principle, the AACL unequivocally condemns violence committed against women irrespective of their racial backgrounds, their sexual orientations, their national origins, their religious affiliations and/or their disability status. The AACL is gravely concerned about women being placed in circumstances encouraging the commission of suicide after having reported an incident of sexual harassment/sexual assault/rape to the authorities. The AACL unequivocally condemns malicious efforts to put women in circumstances encouraging the commission of suicide as a form of retaliation for having reported an incident of sexual harassment/sexual assault/rape. About the August 04th 2020 Suicide of Catherine Daisy Coleman. Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W Official Website.: https://michaelayeleaacl.wordpress.com/2021/12/10/catherine-daisy- coleman-january-08th-2012-sexual-assault-leading-to-august-04th-2020-suicide-hipaa-index/ vThe Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) is a federal law that required the creation of national standards to protect sensitive patient health information from being disclosed without the patient’s consent or knowledge. The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued the HIPAA Privacy Rule to implement the requirements of HIPAA. The HIPAA Security Rule protects a subset of information covered by the Privacy Rule. (…) The Privacy Rule standards address the use and disclosure of individuals’ health information (known as protected health information or PHI) by entities subject to the Privacy Rule. These individuals and organizations are called “covered entities.” The Privacy Rule also contains standards for individuals’ rights to understand privacy and control how their health information is used. A major goal of the Privacy Rule is to make sure that individuals’ health information is properly protected while allowing the flow of health information needed to provide and promote high-quality healthcare, and to protect the public’s health and well-being. The Privacy Rule permits important uses of information while protecting the privacy of people who seek care and healing. (…) The law permits, but does not require, a covered entity to use and disclose PHI, without an individual’s authorization, for the following purposes or situations: Disclosure to the individual (if the information is required for access or accounting of disclosures, the entity MUST disclose to the individual) Treatment, payment, and healthcare operations Opportunity to agree or object to the disclosure of PHI Incident to an otherwise permitted use and disclosure Limited dataset for research, public health, or healthcare operation MICHAEL A. AYELE (A.K.A) W – ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CIVIL LIBERTIES (AACL) 10

  26. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/20/2023 Public interest and benefit activities – The Privacy Rule permits use and disclosure of PHI, without an individual’s authorization or permission, for 12 national priority purposes: 1)When required by law 2)Public health activities 3)Victims of abuse or neglect or domestic violence 4)Health oversight activities 5)Judicial and administrative proceedings 6)Law enforcement 7)Function (such as identification) concerning deceased persons 8)Cadaveric organ, eye, or tissue donation 9)Research, under certain conditions 10)To prevent or lessen a serious threat to health or safety 11)Essential government functions 12)Workers’ compensation Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).: https://www.cdc.gov/phlp/publications/topic/hipaa.html viAudrie Pott Suicide: Top 10 Facts You Need to Know. Heavy.: https://heavy.com/news/2013/04/audrie-pott-suicide-arrests-cyberbullying-rape/ viiAudrie and Daisy. Trailer.: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1DUFZ4Fnd8&ab_channel=KinoCheck.com Audrie and Daisy. #Stop the Shame. Netflix.: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXw843GfNFw&ab_channel=Netflix viii The Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) regrets to inform members of the general public/representatives of the media (who may follow its work) that unknown others were very much eager to assert control over the narrative of events Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W was witness to between October 26th 2013 and November 21st 2013 when he was an employee of the Missouri Department of Mental Health (MODMH) Fulton State Hospital (FSH). Unfortunately, these eager and unknown others have gone on to intrusively insert themselves into the publications of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W on his Internet Archive (Archive.org) account both with malice and without his prior assent. Furthermore, these unknown others have gone on to distort his published written content detailing his recollections of the nights he had spent working as a public employee of the Missouri state government between October 26th 2013 MICHAEL A. AYELE (A.K.A) W – ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CIVIL LIBERTIES (AACL) 11

  27. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/20/2023 and November 21st 2013 without ever requesting for his prior approval. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W was very much displeased upon learning that his written content on various digital platforms were being filtered by Internet Search Engines (ISE), which include (but may not be limited to) AOL, Bing/MSN, and Yahoo! As you may be aware, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W was in 2013 employed for the Fulton State Hospital (FSH): a Missouri state government agency, which is a component of the Missouri Department of Mental Health (MODMH). Between October 26th 2013 and November 21st 2013, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W was subjected to an internal Missouri state government investigation following the self-injurious non-suicidal attempt of a patient/prisoner of the FSH now defunct Biggs Forensic Center (BFC) New Outlook Program (NOP). On (or around) November 21st2013, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W was “cleared” of that Missouri state investigation. Despite several efforts to obtain records relating to that Missouri state government investigation he was subjected to (between October 26th 2013 and November 21st 2013), Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W has thus far been unable to obtain the documents he has asked for. On his official WordPress website, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W had created the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability (HIPAA) tag for the first time in reference to the inconsistent legislative actions that were taken following the August 04th 2020 suicide of Catherine Daisy Coleman and the September 12th 2012 suicide of Audrie Taylor Pott. It is the judgment of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that the provisions of HIPAA enable current/former healthcare workers to express written objections to a specific course of medical treatment a patient is subjected to if the current/former healthcare worker believes the treatment to be discriminatory and/or racist and/or sexist in nature. It is also the judgment of the Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that the inconsistent legislative actions taken (in the State of California and the State of Missouri) following the suicides of Audrie Taylor Pott and Catherine Daisy Coleman merited discussions on the subject of “sexual assault as a factor increasing the risk of suicide”(particularly) among current/former healthcare workers. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W was very much concerned upon learning about the August 04th 2020 suicide of Catherine Daisy Coleman because he was in Calendar Year 2013 a public employee of the MODMH (FSH). As a former employee of the MODMH (FSH), it remains unclear to Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W whether or not his former employers acknowledge as a matter of reality the fact that sexual assault is a factor increasing the risk of suicide. It also remains unclear to Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W if the Personal Health Information (PHI) of Catherine Daisy Coleman reflected this risk. According to a January 30th 2018 report published by the National Council on Disability (NCD), [1] “affirmative and effective consent”is being taught to college/university students of the United States of America (U.S.A) during the course of their Freshmen year; [2] college/university students are informed about “healthy sexual relationships”during the course of their 1st year of post-secondary academic education; [3] twenty percent (20%) of women were sexually assaulted in a college/university setting by the time they had reached their Senior Year in Calendar Year 2005; [4] thirty two (32%) of women with a disability were sexually assaulted during Calendar Year 2014 and 2015 in a college/university setting; [5] sexual assault is a “deeply personal violation,”which leaves “physical and emotional impacts that change the lives of victims;”[6] sexual assault causes “long term physical, psychological and emotional effects, including depression, post-traumatic MICHAEL A. AYELE (A.K.A) W – ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CIVIL LIBERTIES (AACL) 12

  28. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/20/2023 stress, thoughts of suicides and sleep disorders.” Via email, the former employers of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W (i.e.: the MODMH) have refused to deny that Catherine Daisy Coleman was a patient of Missouri Girls Town following the January 08th 2012 sexual assault she was a victim of (only confirming that Missouri Girls Town is indeed a contractual partner of the MODMH). The terms and conditions of the contractual agreements concluded between the MODMH and Missouri Girls Town recognize that Missouri Girls Town is a “time-limited placement resource for children requiring active coordinated and professional intervention in a highly structured environment by virtue of a demonstrated inability to function in any less restrictive setting. Children requiring residential treatment services exhibit a severe mental illness and/or persistent mental disorder as diagnosed according to the DSM-IV. These children may be unable to function consistently in an open, public school setting, may present a chronic runaway risk, and may present a history of showing rage, including physical aggression toward self and others.” It is the judgment of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that the criminal charges filed by the State of Missouri on (or around) January 09th 2014 (which had been assigned Case No.: Kind CR00011) failed to seriously take into consideration the damage that had been inflicted on the physical and mental well-being of Catherine Daisy Coleman on (or around) January 08th 2012. Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W has used his advocacy skills to have his former employers as well as their contractual partners acknowledge the reality that sexual violence is a factor increasing the risk of suicide for the purpose of preventing in the future similar suicides such as the one committed by Catherine Daisy Coleman on (or around) August 04th 2020. Unfortunately, however, it remains unclear for Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W what the obligations of the MODMH pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (HIPAA) actually are. The MODMH were extremely vague to Sunshine requests submitted on the subject of [1] whether they have in the past disclosed the PHI of an individual in circumstances, where discrimination was at play (for the purpose of remedying the discrimination); [2] whether they were in the past required to disclose the PHI of an individual either to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and/or the courts (for the purpose of remedying the discrimination). As a matter of principle, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W unequivocally condemns violence committed against women irrespective of their racial backgrounds, their sexual orientations, their national origins, their religious affiliations and/or their disability status. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W also condemns malicious efforts designed to place women in circumstances encouraging the commission of suicide after a documented incident of sexual violence. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W takes full responsibility for this publication on the subject of “The ‘Web’ Unwelcome Filtering of the Night Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Spent on October 26th 2013 as a Public Employee of the Missouri Department of Mental Health (MODMH) Fulton State Hospital (FSH) Now-Defunct Biggs Forensic Center (BFC) New Outlook Program (NOP): Context on the Inconsistent Legislative Action Taken by the Governments of the State of California and the State of Missouri Following the Suicides of Audrie Taylor Pott and Catherine Daisy Coleman.” Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL).: https://michaelayeleaacl.wordpress.com/2023/12/18/web-unwelcome-filtering-of-october-26th- MICHAEL A. AYELE (A.K.A) W – ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CIVIL LIBERTIES (AACL) 13

  29. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/20/2023 2013-at-missouris-fulton-state-hospital-context-on-2016-netflix-documentary-audrie-and-daisy- after-aug-04th-2020-index/ ixExcerpt of Email Sent by Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W to Scribd on (or around) December 18th 2023 Hello, This is Michael A. Ayele sending this message though I now go by W. You may call me W. I am writing this letter because it has recently come to my attention that my written content on the subject of "affirmative and effective consent in healthy sexual relationships," which I had published on Scribd was distorted by the so-called "web." As you may be aware, all Freshmen undergraduate students of the United States of America (U.S.A) are now being taught what constitutes "affirmative and effective consent" in healthy sexual relationships as part of their formal post-secondary academic education. Furthermore, all Freshmen undergraduate students of the U.S.A receive Title IX training on what constitutes "sexual harassment" as part of their formal post-secondary academic education. In their January 30th 2018 report, the National Council on Disability (NCD) recognized this, writing in part that [1] “affirmative and effective consent” is being taught to college/university students of the United States of America (U.S.A) during the course of their Freshmen year; [2] college/university students are informed about “healthy sexual relationships” during the course of their 1st year of post-secondary academic education; [3] twenty percent (20%) of women were sexually assaulted in a college/university setting by the time they had reached their Senior Year in Calendar Year 2005; [4] thirty two (32%) of women with a disability were sexually assaulted during Calendar Year 2014 and 2015 in a college/university setting; [5] sexual assault is a “deeply personal violation,”which leaves “physical and emotional impacts that change the lives of victims;”[6] sexual assault causes “long term physical, psychological and emotional effects, including depression, post-traumatic stress, thoughts of suicides and sleep disorders.” After reading the January 30th 2018 report of the NCD, I, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the NCD, which went on to be assigned by Case No.: 2023 - 01. After further consideration, I, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W decided to publish the entire content of my correspondence with the NCD on the subject of their January 30th 2018 report as well as the issues I had taken with that report. Can you explain how it is possible for others to intrusively insert themselves into the content of my written correspondence with the NCD (on the subject of their January 30th 2018 report) after I had published this correspondence of mine on Scribd? In other words, can you explain how it is possible for others to filter the content of my written correspondence with the NCD (on the subject of their January 30th 2018 report) on Internet Search Engines (ISE) such as Bing/MSN and possibly others? MICHAEL A. AYELE (A.K.A) W – ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CIVIL LIBERTIES (AACL) 14

  30. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/20/2023 I will encourage that you be well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. xOn World Suicide Prevention Day, our Nation joins the World Health Organization, the International Association for Suicide Prevention, and countries across the globe in mourning those who have died by suicide. Suicide is a devastating tragedy that leaves loved ones with unanswered questions and families missing a piece of their soul, wishing for more time together. We are still in the early stages of learning about the conditions that can lead to suicide, including job strain or loss; serious illnesses; and financial, criminal, legal, and relationship problems. Acknowledging suicide and the impact it has on our communities is a first step to understanding how it can be prevented more effectively. Suicide accounts for 1 of every 100 deaths globally, and it is the second leading cause of death for Americans between the ages of 10 and 34. (…) On this day of commemoration and action, we commit to studying the risk factors associated with suicide and to making mental health care accessible and affordable. Finally, to those experiencing emotional distress: please know that you are loved, and that you are not alone. There is hope, and there is help, and I encourage you to call or text 9-8-8 to reach the National Suicide & Crisis Lifeline. NOW, THEREFORE, I, JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 10, 2022, as World Suicide Prevention Day. I call upon all Americans, communities, organizations, and all levels of government to join me in creating hope through action and committing to preventing suicide across America. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ninth day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-two, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-seventh. A Proclamation on World Suicide Prevention Day, 2022. White House.: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2022/09/09/a- proclamation-on-world-suicide-prevention-day-2022/ MICHAEL A. AYELE (A.K.A) W – ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CIVIL LIBERTIES (AACL) 15

  31. APPENDIX C.

  32. APPENDIX D.

More Related