1 / 14

Statistical association of genotype and phenotype

Statistical association of genotype and phenotype. Linkage map. Fig. 3 in Collard et al. Euphytica (2005) 142: 169–196. Linkage map. Fig. 7 in Collard et al. Euphytica (2005) 142: 169–196. Association between genotype and phenotype. Fig. 9 in Collard et al. Euphytica (2005) 142: 169–196.

Download Presentation

Statistical association of genotype and phenotype

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Statistical association of genotype and phenotype

  2. Linkage map Fig. 3 in Collard et al. Euphytica (2005) 142: 169–196

  3. Linkage map Fig. 7 in Collard et al. Euphytica (2005) 142: 169–196

  4. Association between genotype and phenotype Fig. 9 in Collard et al. Euphytica (2005) 142: 169–196

  5. Association between genotype and phenotype

  6. Single marker analysis • Using e.g., ANOVA, regression • However, can’t distinguish between effect size and distance between marker and QTL

  7. Interval mapping • Uses multiple markers at a time • Uses flanking marker genotypess to infer probability of genotype at intervals between the markers • Associates probability of genotype with phenotype

  8. Association between genotype and phenotype

  9. Association between genotype and phenotype • Linear regression

  10. Association between genotype and phenotype • Maximum likelihood LOD score = log(maximum likelihood with a QTL) maximum likelihood without a QTL

  11. Selective genotyping • Genotyping is expensive and time consuming • May be more efficient to genotype only the most phenotypically extreme individuals Darvasi and Soller 1992, Theor Appl Genet 85: 353-359

  12. Selective genotyping • Genotyping is expensive and time consuming • May be more efficient to genotype only the most phenotypically extreme individuals • Selective genotyping may reduce power to resolve linked QTL • Selective genotyping may affect estimates of QTL effect size

  13. Beavis effect • Small sample sizes may lead to overestimation of QTL effect sizes

More Related