1 / 16

Small scale biochar - Details we can’t ignore -

Small scale biochar - Details we can’t ignore -. Centre for AlternativeTechnology 8 September 2009. Deepak Rughani Biofuelwatch. Antagony or Synergy?. Fertiliser input. Losses on combustion IEA 12-35% http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org. Erosion losses (water & wind)

mgerken
Download Presentation

Small scale biochar - Details we can’t ignore -

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Small scale biochar - Details we can’t ignore - Centre for AlternativeTechnology 8 September 2009 Deepak Rughani Biofuelwatch

  2. Antagony or Synergy? Fertiliser input Losses on combustion IEA 12-35% http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org Erosion losses (water & wind) on conventionally tilled field http://images.google.co.uk Up to 30% losses Tillage Loss to carbon pool www.sparetheair.org Indirect Impacts . Microbial breakdown of SOC http://images.google.co.uk/ Labile Fraction http://images.google.co.uk

  3. Combustion GHG emissions • IEA 12% to 35% conversion rate • Wood up to 50% carbon 1 tonne biochar requires approx 8 tonnes dry wood • UK study 10 – 20 tonnes charcoal / Ha = 80 – 160 tonnes dry wood Corn stover 2.83t/Ha : Sugar Cane 20t/Ha wet • Biochar stoves promoted as only alternative to open fire cooking • Efficient biomass stoves? • Solar stoves? Slide 3

  4. Transportation, Loading, Application • Canadian study – 30% • Black carbon = 25% of radiative forcing by holding heat + loss of albedo (500-680 x CO2) • Surface spreading promoted as non-till Slide 3

  5. CO2 linked to tillage Integration into soils: • Japan – surface soil • Deep tillage • CO2 emissions linked to soil disturbance • (Deep tillage damages soil structure) • Tillage also speeds up the breakdown of biochar (confirmed CSIRO) • Slide 3

  6. SOC losses due to enhanced microbial activity. • Charcoal addition linked to increased microbial breakdown of SOC (Boreal study) • Some microbial breakdown of charcoal also exists Slide 3

  7. Labile Fraction • Johannes Lehmann et al: Labile carbon fraction = 1 to 20% • Evidence it could be >20% • Masiello looked at ‘global black carbon budget’ • Boreal forest fires study • Nguyen et al: West Kenyan study • Lorenz et al: Unpublished study in Costa Rica • Some evidence that nitrogen addition (either organic or synthetic) reduces stability of charcoal • Glazer 50-100 yrs Slide 3

  8. Soil erosion • Loss of agricultural residue exposes soils to more severe dehydration, water and wind erosion - SOC losses - Black carbon losses • David Pimentel and Rattan Lal: Crop residue removal - 100 fold increase in erosion Slide 3

  9. Incorporated biochar may not be ‘additional’ • IPCC - crop residue removal > reduction of SOC • Derived from previous reductions in carbon stocks/pool • Deprived of organic carbon necessary for metabolism by soil organisms, soils would deplete very quickly. • With CC, respiration of organic matter will increase so more harvest residue required Slide 3

  10. Synthetic fertiliser requirement • Biochar does not contain nutrients except fresh biochar in ash • Even if biochar shown to make uptake of nutrients from organic and synthetic fertilisers more efficient… • In fact need for synthetic fertilisers will now be much greater – the reverse effect! • 10 to 100Kg N fertiliser required / Ha and reduces stability of biochar (CSIRO) • Ammonium bicarbonate, N2O + reinforces fossil fuel industry Slide 3

  11. Indirect Impacts- small farmers carrying the cost - Accelerated land use change • 25-30% more residue removal > soil erosion • Impoverishment of local hydrological cycle • Extended grazing requirement Dependence on synthetic fertilisers Health • PAHs • Charcoal dust / particulates: Pneomococoniosis Subsidies / Financial Viability • CDMs and ETS exclude small farmers • Patents favour industry No real choice • Biomass stoves or solar cookers Slide 3

  12. Biochar production in Drylands Reclaiming dryland or accelerating desertification? 3 1 “Renewable” energy + biochar from biomass > initial habitat loss Ongoing residue removal > reduced humidity & micro-climate > further habitat loss > erosion of (drying and depleting) topsoil > > > 2 Reduced soil organic carbon even with short term biochar benefit > soil depletion Antagony is being mistaken for synergy?

  13. UNFCCC: Emissions or Economics? Very limited NGO awareness, no conclusive field trials, unsubstantiated claims to UN bodies… • Proposal to include biochar inCDM: selling ‘rights to pollute’, includes bc from destructive ind. tree plant. • A call fordouble creditsbyCarbon Gold not limited to residues. Cf Malaysia • A call to lift limit onCER on carbon sink projects: reinforces bau • A call to reform Additionality: claim that seq- uestration can be accurately measured (UNCCD), urgency now an excuse for invalid accounting Plantar's eucalyptus plantations for charcoal as fuel for pig iron in Minais Gerais, Brazil:

  14. Calls for Caution • UNEP "Biochar is a new and poorly understood technology… The impacts of large-scale biochar production on biodiversity and long-term agricultural sustainability (e.g. nutrient depletion) are unknown". • Royal Society “Biochar (CDR technique) the report identified significant doubts relating to the potential scope, effectiveness and safety of this technique and recommended that substantial research would be required before it could be considered for eligibility for UN carbon credits.”  • Biochar Declaration • Precautionary Principle

  15. Confirmed backing UNCCD secretariat submission to UNFCCC. Inclusion of biochar into draft 2009 agenda for “dialogue for the post 2012 climate regime” Backed by Micronesia 11 calls for "Concrete action for the inclusion of soil organic carbon restoration as a significant mitigation and adaptation tool to climate change" By: Gambia, Ghana, Lesotho, Mozambique, Niger, Senegal, Swaziland, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe.  Similar submission by Belize Lobbyists International Biochar Initiative US (Inc Renew the Earth) Biochar Europe calling for inclusion of biochar in EU ETS (Inc Shell, JP Morgan and Centre for Rural Innovations) UK Biochar Research Centre Australia: Turnbull’s opposition Liberal party NZ: Forestry Ministry Brazil: Embrapa Biochar lobby forums in Canada and Mongolia Biochar Fund Gathering momentum…in absence of conclusions from field trials

More Related