1 / 12

Regional industrialization, inter-firm coordination and inequalities in Central Europe

Regional industrialization, inter-firm coordination and inequalities in Central Europe. Bob Hancké (LSE) ESRC seminar Warwick Business School 5 June 2009. Outline .

metea
Download Presentation

Regional industrialization, inter-firm coordination and inequalities in Central Europe

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Regional industrialization, inter-firm coordination and inequalities in Central Europe Bob Hancké (LSE) ESRC seminar Warwick Business School 5 June 2009

  2. Outline • Key point of presentation: even if regional economic development takes a turn for the better in CEE, regional inequalities are likely to result • Three steps in argument • Leading sectors • FDI and firm-level adjustment • Regional agglomeration and regional ineqalities • Based on Bob Hancké & Lucia Kurekova, Varieties of Capitalism and Economic Governance in Central Europe. Final report for Project CIT1-CT-2004-506392 (NewGov STACEE), September 2008 [available at http://www.eu-newgov.org/database/DELIV/D20D09_Final_Report_STACEE.pdf, accessed 21 Nov 2008].

  3. 1.Leading sectors • Proxied through exports • Proxy for upgrading, type of economic production, level of economic activity and economic development • Defined by asset specificity: labor vs. capital intensity (Greskovits, 2005) Basic sectors: • Light-basic: intensive neither in physical nor human capital, but unskilled labor: cork and wood, textile, rubber, furniture manufacturing, clothing and accessories and footwear • Heavy-basic: intensive only in physical capital: food, live animals, beverages and tobacco, fuels, vegetable oils, iron and steel, pulp and paper, non-ferrous metals Complex sectors • Light-complex: only human capital intensive: pharmaceuticals, office and data processing machines, electrical machinery, scientific equipment, optical goods, clocks • Heavy-complex: both physical and human capital intensive: chemicals, machinery and equipment, road vehicles and transport equipment

  4. Leading sectors and country differentiation

  5. 2.FDI and firm-level adjustment • Sectoral analysis suggested different time horizons • Time horizons related to level of fixed costs and asset specificity • Long v. short-term horizon for amortisation of investment

  6. Example: Automotive industry in CEE • Firms in automotive industry: • Fastest-growing ‘complex’ sector in CEE since late 1990s; • Very large production numbers (almost 3 Mio cars annually); • Within 200km radius; • Common supplier network; • Recruitment among same workforce

  7. Geography of automotive sector in V4

  8. Bottlenecks and coordination • Bottlenecks: collective goods and emerging forms of coordination • Example: low supply of skilled labour, because little adequate training, labour emigration, stock depleted; poaching of trained workers • Collective action problems: poaching resolved through inter-firm cooperation • Islands of low-level inter-firm coordination, organized outside standard governance structures

  9. 3.Regional effects – the plus side • Devolution of supply-side policies to local authorities • Structural funds as development aid • From low-wage location to high value-added manufacturing; compare with Spain & Portugal 1980s; unit value rising, not falling after 15 years of re-industrialization; • Emergence of highly ‘balkanized’ local industrial systems, organised around large foreign firms

  10. The dark side of industrial development: agglomeration and regional dualism • Regional activism + FDI produce, via network externalities, regional agglomeration effects: sophisticated firms go where other sophisticated firms already are. • Concentration of sophisticated investment in a limited number of already well-off regions • As rich regions become richer, poor regions become relatively poorer

  11. Conclusion • Even under best possible circumstances – fast-growing, sophisticated industry, inter-firm coordination, and regional actors who play a role in setting up supply-side institutions (as we can find in V4) – CEE faceS dramatic regional inequalities, which are likely to increase.

More Related