LONG-RUN COSTS

1 / 28

# LONG-RUN COSTS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

LONG-RUN COSTS. In the long-run there are no fixed inputs, and therefore no fixed costs. All costs are variable. Another way to look at the long-run is that in the long-run a firm can choose any amount of fixed costs it wants for making short-run decisions. Cost Minimization.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

## PowerPoint Slideshow about 'LONG-RUN COSTS' - meryl

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
LONG-RUN COSTS
• In the long-run there are no fixed inputs, and therefore no fixed costs. All costs are variable.
• Another way to look at the long-run is that in the long-run a firm can choose any amount of fixed costs it wants for making short-run decisions.
Cost Minimization
• Suppose a firm has a production function with two variable inputs, labor (L), and capital (K).
• Q = f(L, K)
• This production function can be represented by an isoquant map.

Q3

Q2

Q1

Some isoquants: Q1 < Q2 < Q3

capital

(K)

labor (L)

Marginal Rate of Technical Substitution
• The Marginal Rate of Technical Substitution of L or K is the amount of K it takes to make up for the loss of one unit of L, output constant.
• MRTS (L for K) = -KL, output constant.
• MRTS is (minus) the slope of an isoquant.
Problem
• The firm is told it has to produce a particular output level, say, Q*.
• The firm can buy L and K at fixed known prices,
• PL and PK.
• How should the firm choose L and K if it must produce Q* at minimum cost?
• C = PL L + PKK
• For a given value of C, the above expression is known as an "isocost" line, or "cost constraint".
The firm's cost contraint can be rewritten as
• K = (C/ PK ) - (PL /PK ) L
• and drawn on the same set of axes as the firm's isoquants.

capital

(K)

The slope of the isocost line is (PL /PK )

C"/ PK

labor (L)

C"/ PL

capital

(K)

C"/ PK

Q*

labor (L)

C"/ PL

Exactly C* is the minimum cost of producing Q*.

What's the rule? How much L and K are used?

capital

(K)

C*/ PK

C"/ PK

Q*

C*/ PL

labor (L)

C"/ PL

Finding the Long-run Total Cost Curve
• The Long-Run Total Cost Curve shows the minimum cost of producing any output when all inputs are variable.
• In this case the number of inputs is two.
• We show how to find a couple of points on the firm's LRTC curve.

Q* and C* are one point of the firm's LRTC curve.

What's the cost of producing Q' (>Q*)?

capital

(K)

C*/ PK

K*

Q'

Q*

C*/ PL

L*

labor (L)

Use these points to start plotting the LRTC curve.

capital

(K)

C'/ PK

C*/ PK

K*

Q'

Q*

C*/ PL

L*

labor (L)

The Long-run Average Cost Curve

The long-run average cost curve shows the minimum average cost at each output level when all inputs are variable, that is, when the firm can have any plant size it wants.

There is a relationship between the LRAC curve and the firm's set of short-run average cost curves.

SR and LR Average Costs
• Economists use the term “plant size” to talk about having a particular amount of fixed inputs. Choosing a different amount of plant and equipment (plant size) amounts to choosing an amount of fixed costs.
• Economists want you to think of fixed costs as being associated with plant and equipment. Bigger plants have larger fixed costs.
If each plant size is associated with a different amount of fixed costs, then each plant size for a firm will give us a different set of short-run cost curves.
• Choosing a different plant size (a long-run decision) then means moving from one short-run cost curve to another.

Each small U-shaped

curve is a SAC curve.

• Economists usually assume that plant size is infinitely divisible (variable). In the case of finely divisible plant size, the LRAC curve might look like this:

\$/Q

LRAC

The LRAC

curve.

Q

Average costs for a

typical firm.

In the preceding graph, each short-run cost curve corresponds to a particular amount of fixed inputs.
• As the fixed input amount increases in the long run, you move to different SR cost curves, each one corresponding to a particular plant size.
Notice in the graphs of LRAC curves presented so far that the curves have been drawn to be U-shaped. That is, when output is increasing LRAC at first falls, and then eventually rises.
• The overall shape of the long-run average cost curve depends on the technology of production.
For example, advantages implicit in large scale production (with large plants) may allow firms to produce large outputs at lower cost per unit.
• On the other hand, firms may get so big that ever increasing managerial and monitoring costs may cause unit costs to rise.

LRAC shows

economies of

scale here.

\$/Q

LRAC

Q

Average costs for a

typical pizza firm.

DISECONOMIES OF SCALE: When output increases, long-run average costs increase.

LRAC shows

diseconomies of

scale here.

\$/Q

LRAC

Q

Average costs for a

typical pizza firm.

For the U-shaped long-run average cost curve, there are economies of scale over small outputs, and diseconomies of scale at larger outputs.
Not all firms necessarily suffer from diseconomies of scale at large outputs.
• When a firm has economies of scale over a range of outputs big enough to supply the total market demand, that firm is called a natural monopoly.

\$/Q

• Naturally monopolies have long-run average cost curves that look like this:

LRAC

Q

Electric power generation

in a local market

As we will see, firms in perfect competition must have U-shaped long-run average cost curves.
• One conclusion from this is that only certain industries can be expected to be perfectly competitive. And a crucial factor is the technology of production, since that is what determines the shape of the long-run average cost curve.