slide1 n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Kluczowe problemy poruszane na Advisory Group: Pricing, Future T2s Governance PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Kluczowe problemy poruszane na Advisory Group: Pricing, Future T2s Governance

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 21

Kluczowe problemy poruszane na Advisory Group: Pricing, Future T2s Governance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 100 Views
  • Uploaded on

Kluczowe problemy poruszane na Advisory Group: Pricing, Future T2s Governance User Connectivity. Sławomir Panasiuk Wiceprezes Zarządu KDPW SA Warszawa 14 grudnia 2010. T2S Pricing. EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK T2S Programme Office. T2S costs.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Kluczowe problemy poruszane na Advisory Group: Pricing, Future T2s Governance' - mercury


Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

Kluczoweproblemyporuszanena Advisory Group:

    • Pricing,
    • Future T2s Governance
    • UserConnectivity

Sławomir Panasiuk

Wiceprezes Zarządu KDPW SA Warszawa 14 grudnia 2010

t2s pricing

T2S Pricing

EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

T2S Programme Office

t2s costs
T2S costs
  • Development phase (total, from Jan. 2008 to Sep. 2014):4CB: € 256.4 millionECB: € 90.2 million
  • Migration and running phase (annual average, from Sep. 2014 to Sep 2022)4CB: € 51.0 millionECB: € 9.2 million
  • Capital cost over development and migration/running phase of eight years: € 88.9 million in total
  • Contingency provision during migration and running phase: € 41.1 million over eight years
volume estimates for future years
Volume estimates for future years

Estimates of future annual growth rates based on March 2010 AG questionnaire:

changes to pricing proposal presented in september ag
Changes to pricing proposal presented in September AG
  • The T2S Programme Board presented a range of prices to the September AG, depending on
    • which non-euro currencies are in T2S
    • the length of the cost recovery period
  • Depending on the scenario, the price ranged from 12 – 24 cents per DVP instruction.
  • Based on the feed-back of the AG, the T2S Programme Board modified several parameters :
    • Proportion of revenue to be generated from information services was increased from 20% to 25%
    • One year extension of the cost recovery period to 7 years of full operation (plus 1 year migration)
    • De-linking of the price from participation of particular non-euro currencies and instead targeting a certain volume share

N.B. no support for step-wise pricing

t2s pricing policy i
T2S pricing policy – I
  • Governing Council decided to fix the DvP price at 15 cent per instruction for the period Sep. 2014 to Dec. 2018
  • Commitment not to increase T2S fees by more than 10% per year between 2019 and the end of the cost recovery period, i.e. September 2022
  • This pricing policy is subject to the following conditions:
    • in addition to the euro settlement volume, non-euro currencies add at least 20% to the total volume;
    • the securities settlement volume in the EU is no more than 10% lower than the volumes projected by the T2S Programme Office, which are based on information provided by market participants; and
    • the tax authorities confirm that the Eurosystem will not be charged VAT for the T2S services it provides.
t2s pricing policy ii
T2S pricing policy – II

For period Jan 2019 – September 2022:

  • Still many unknowns, which make a price guarantee difficult

BUT

  • Expected volume increases caused by dynamic effects
  • Percentage of non-euro currencies likely to be higher than 20%

The T2S Programme Board aims at further lowering settlement prices below 15 cents

price list ii
Price list - II

* These items will initially be set at a zero price, presuming that actual usage will be within an expected consumption pattern. However, should there be a stronger than expected use of the IT system resources which adversely affects T2S performance, it will be reconsidered to charge for these items. Such review will occur at regular intervals.

proposal for future t2s governance

Proposal for future T2S Governance

EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

T2S Programme Office

proposed t2s g overnance structure
Proposed T2S Governance structure

Governors’ Forum

ECB Governing Council

Executive Board

Non-euro central banks’governors / boards

Non-euro Currencies Steering Group

(non-euro area NCBs that signed Currency Participation Agreement)

T2SBoard

Eurosystem Informal GroupESCB/ Eurosystem Committees

Advisory Group

CSDSteeringGroup

(CSDs that signed FrameworkAgreement)

National UserGroups

Information Sessions with all Stakeholders

user connectivity for t2s

User Connectivity for T2S

Update

EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

T2S Programme Office

status and plan
Status and plan
  • Formal launch of licensing of up to 3 providers (NSPs) at end of February 2011
  • Delayed by two months to take account of feedback from Technical Dialogue held on 25 October 2010
  • Licences to be awarded in Sep 2011
  • Proof of concept, to prove feasibility of each NSP’s design, finishes Mar 2012
  • Acceptance testing of full scale solution, finishes May 2013
  • Then up to 3 licensed solutions are available for user testing by CSDs, DCPs and CBs.
design objectives
Design objectives
  • The solutions should be compliant with the Giovannini protocol recommendations and in line with the URD requirements
  • There should be competition between NSPs in order to achieve low prices, both at the start of, and during the life of, T2S
  • To support low prices, we should achieve:
    • As little value added service as possible provided by the NSPs, while consistent with T2S requirements
    • As much re-use of existing NSP products as possible, to keep their costs low
safety
Safety
  • Achieving safety is not free of cost!
  • NSPs must provide value-added security features
  • These have been minimised
safety and operational disruptions
Safety and operational disruptions
  • The level of operational risk rises very rapidly as the number of channels for incoming and outgoing traffic is increased. That is why we have limited the number to “up to 3” NSPs (as already explained to the AG).
  • T2S is “built on TARGET2” – which has only one such channel.
  • Each NSP thus provides an essential value added service because concentrates traffic from many Actors into one stream of data arriving at T2S (and vice versa for outbound).
the interpretation of direct lines
The interpretation of “direct lines”
  • NSPs are acting as network traffic concentrators.
  • UR [T2S.12.290] is interpreted ensuring that an Actor can buy network capacity (bandwidth) rather than pay for each unit of traffic (message or file).
  • Each Actor can agree bilaterally on the level of service provided to him by the NSP.
  • And competition will ensure that the extra costs for the limited mandatory value added services will be recovered by the NSP via a fair economic price.
  • This interpretation is not new; it is inescapable in the context of the decision to limit the number of connections to up to 3, and has already been presented on several occasions.
interpretation of the pull service
Interpretation of the “pull” service
  • The URD refers to Actors “pulling” data from T2S [T2S.12.260]
  • This business requirement is met on the technical level – as it is in many other systems – by Actors pushing a request to T2S which then pushes the data to the requestor.
  • This also simplifies the system build by Actors since they have only one operating model.
approval
Approval
  • The AG is asked to approve the preceding interpretations.
  • The AG may wish to consider whether the URD need to be formally revised, after appropriate consideration.
slide21

www.kdpw.pl

Krajowy Depozyt Papierów Wartościowych S.A.

ul. Książęca 4, 00-498 Warszawa

kdpw@kdpw.pl