1 / 12

Teaching Midrash Meaningfully in Elementary School

Teaching Midrash Meaningfully in Elementary School. Deena Sigel. In This Discussion. My Research (briefly) The need for pedagogy in midrash Underpinnings of my model of midrash pedagogy Overview of Data: midrash understandings Illustrations from one student, Lucy.

melva
Download Presentation

Teaching Midrash Meaningfully in Elementary School

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Teaching Midrash Meaningfully in Elementary School Deena Sigel

  2. In This Discussion • My Research (briefly) • The need for pedagogy in midrash • Underpinnings of my model of midrash pedagogy • Overview of Data: midrash understandings • Illustrations from one student, Lucy

  3. The Need for Midrash Pedagogyfor meaningful understandings of midrash “Doesn’t everything we teach have a pedagogy?” In the case of midrash: answer is negative • Result: confusion, some questionnaire responses • American Students: “Don’t take it literally.” “What does that mean?” • British Students: Midrash is complex or deep. (agree) • Midrash is not very deep. (agree) • Some erroneous views: • Pious view: midrash is ‘too holy to understand’ • Cynical view: it’s only midrash • Worst case: midrash is ridiculous Torah is ridiculous

  4. Theory to Practice: A Model for Midrash Pedagogy: Basic Theoretical Underpinnings • Children’s Religious Understandings • a. Piaget: stages of development; concrete thinking only • b. Ashton et al: imagination leads to abstract thinking and toward spirituality • Children’s ‘sense-making’ • Dewey: Inquiry & Reflection on experience; engaging - problems • Bruner: Storying (Egan: Romantic Understanding) Construction of Meaning :Bruner’s co-operative model • Children’s intuitive thinking: complex and analytical • Learning spirals midrash on its own terms • Hermeneutic of affirmation and exploration (A. Wright)

  5. Testing the Model: Quantitative Data from the international study

  6. Lucy at Pre-Test • What she knew • Midrash contains stories • Midrash is, “to interpret the Torah, to make it clear” • What she didn’t know • That Rashi quotes midrash • That midrash contains values or ethics • That midrash is serious • That midrash is complex

  7. Midrashic Narrative (handout) • Teaching Aims • Exegetical nature • Exegetical opportunity (filling in gaps) • Religious underpinnings • Complexity and seriousness

  8. Lucy’s Journey (a) Learning & Questioning • Q: What is the midrash trying to explain by creating a conversation between Satan and God? • A: To explain why God asked Avraham to sacrifice Yitshak. • “[But] they could make up anything..So, whatever they make up? .. But different rabbis could see the Torah in different perspectives?”

  9. Lucy’s Journey (b) Was this unclear? • Q: What is the purpose of midrash? • A: So, um, to give - Let's say we don't know, why, um, something happened, • to give a reason why something happened which is not unclear, but to show something that's not completely clear. To give reasons for things that seem unclear.

  10. Lucy’s Journey (c) Midrashic Process: complexity & exegesis Teacher: Can you think of a midrash that explains things on different levels? Lucy: The akeidah, that it explains what these things were, and why the akeidah happened. Teacher: How does the midrash connect itself to the part of the Torah that it speaks about? Lucy: Let's say with the akeidah. No-one actually knows why it happened, so it explained why it happened and said the things had [been] said before, and so they use it, that hint, to make something. They made like an idea or a story .. what could have happened or might have happened…. .. Not for little children, [because] you have to think deeper than the outer reason.

  11. Post-Test Reflections • Lucy: I liked how they took the hints from what the Torah was saying, and kind of introduced it in, like a, maybe, a jealousy kind-of-way or a 'showing-offy' kind-of-way or in an encouraging kind-of way. • Teacher: Does midrash change the way we think of the story in the Torah? • Lucy: It makes you think, ‘yeah, how did that happen?’ [Midrash] makes you think [about the story in the Torah] from a different perspective.

  12. Conclusion: Kids and Midrash • Children are abstract thinkers • Children are capable of religious understanding • Children need to question in order to reflect • Children need to engage with the midrash text in order to achieve meaningful understandings of midrash • See step-by-step model on the handout sheet

More Related