120 likes | 210 Views
Explore the evolution of university ratings in Italian universities, from historical origins to the present challenges. Discover the impact of educational measurement and the state of universities in Italy.
E N D
EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT IN ITALIAN UNIVERSITIES and THE UNIVERSITY RATING EVOLUTION by Raimondo Manca
SOME HISTORY • In the second half of the 19° century Italy was unified • There was a high rate of illitteralicy • Big differences between the north and south • Two big intuitions at the end of the century • Montessori’s method • The teacher should adequate to the scholars • Creation of universities devoted to the preparation of teachers for primary school • Italian primary school was very good and the Montessori method was adopted in many countries
CRISIS OF ITALIAN SCHOOL • Strong increase of university students in seventies • Many people became University professors without the quality • The school teachers were paid less • Teaching was considered a second best • More and more students that are not well prepared arrive at university • A vicious circle was created
ACTUAL SITUATION • The Faculties that prepared primary school teachers were cancelled and were transformed in something more general (Educational Sciences) • There are 36 faculties of Educational Sciences • 16 statistics or psicometry professors (associate or full) • 9 assistant professors • Educational measurement is not yet well established in Italy
UNIVERSITY RATING TIME EVOLUTION I • Hypotheses • Homogeneity • Semi-Markov process • Discrete time (DTHSMP) • Steps • State subdivision • Embedded Markov Chain • Waiting time distribution function • Model application • Results
STATE SUBDIVISION • State set: • State 1 1-20 • State 2 21-40 • State 3 41-70 • State 4 71-100 • State 5 101-150 • State 6 151-200 • State 7 201-300 • State 8 301-400 • State 9 401-500 • State 10 No Rating
INPUT CONSTRUCTION • Embedded Markov Chain construction • Number of transitions from the state i to the state j • Number of transition from the state i • Probability to go from state i to state j • Waiting time distribution function • number of transition from i to j within a time t • probability to have a transition in a time ≤ t
CONCLUSIONS • Universities • Private universities • Countries • Data collection for the first 6000 world universities • Construction of input data