1 / 23

Ockham Technologies, Equity, Boards, and related issues

John Burr. Ockham Technologies, Equity, Boards, and related issues. Ockham Technology – what happened ?. Board of Directors Raised first round from VCs (Noro-Moseley & Monarch), with each getting one seat on the board Added a 5 th , very experienced industry person

melosa
Download Presentation

Ockham Technologies, Equity, Boards, and related issues

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. John Burr Ockham Technologies, Equity, Boards, and related issues

  2. Ockham Technology – what happened? • Board of Directors • Raised first round from VCs (Noro-Moseley & Monarch), with each getting one seat on the board • Added a 5th, very experienced industry person • Development/outsourcing – • Outsourced to ThoughtMill • Also hired Gus as internal development team leader • Founder tensions • Tensions continued to grow, and worsened after Ockham hired a COO • Mike left • Company sold in 2002 to competitor

  3. Lesson #1 Splitting Founder’s Equity

  4. Considerations in Allocating Initial Ownership • Potential Problem – Ockham founders split only based on amount of initial equity • Other criteria to use: • What cash, ideas, & property contributed? • If property, what is value? • What contributions are founders expected to make in the future? • What opportunity costs will each founder incur? • Career risk taken by each founder • Financial demands faced by each founder • May have to reserve ownership for future founders. • Potential problem - split equity very early

  5. Dynamic equity-splitting Generally, dynamic is better than static

  6. Lesson #2 Building a Board

  7. Boards and new ventures • Texas angel – $10 mm, 50% stake (“Dumb” money) • VC - $2 mm, 33% stake (“Smart” money) • Does VC create $48 mm in value? ($8mm / 16.7%) Advice & Resources to build pie Control & Ownership

  8. The Benefits of Having an Independent Board • Brings perspective and experience, and a set of complementary skills for the CEO • Recognize the need for long-term planning and assist in long-range strategies • Can provide a framework for control and discipline and give CEO someone to answer to • Can be challenging and objective critics, serving as an internal check for CEO • Can be mentor or coach • Can lend credibility Source: Bagley, CE & Dauch, CE. The Entrepreneur’s Guide to Business Law, West Publishing.

  9. The Size of the Board • 5-9 people • Small enough to be accountable and to act as a deliberate body, but large enough to carry out the necessary responsibilities. • Outsiders should outnumber the insiders • Usually, no more than 2 insiders on the board. Source: Bagley, CE & Dauch, CE. The Entrepreneur’s Guide to Business Law, West Publishing.

  10. Type of Representation Needed on Board • Need functional skills needed to keep the business running smoothly and to bring business to next level of growth • Need right mix of personalities • Should inventory the resource needs of the company before you begin recruiting the board: • What is the competitive advantage of the company? • What will be the demands on the company and the likely changes in the next few years? • How much technical expertise is needed to understand the company’s practices? • What role does marketing play? R&D? Customer service? • What is the company’s access to financing? Source: Bagley, CE & Dauch, CE. The Entrepreneur’s Guide to Business Law, West Publishing.

  11. Type of Representation Needed – The needed skills • Assess management team’s strengths and weaknesses with regard to industry experience, financial expertise, marketing experience, start-up experience, and technical know-how, maybe international experience. • Age, gender and cultural background • Be wary of filling board with: • People whose interests may not be aligned with the company’s, or to whom the company already has access. • Attorney • Subordinates to CEO • Consultants Source: Bagley, CE & Dauch, CE. The Entrepreneur’s Guide to Business Law, West Publishing.

  12. Lesson #3 Outsourcing & New Ventures

  13. Reasons new ventures outsource • At early stages, founders are stretched too far • Founding team may lack relevant capabilities • Working on tight deadlines • Adds flexibility when when a company is still experimenting with its business model • Negative: May lack a level of control for critical function

  14. Lesson # 4 Social capital & Entrepreneurship

  15. Entrepreneurship exists precisely because people do not have equal information or beliefs - Kirzner (1973) If a resource owner held the same beliefs and information as an entrepreneur, she would adjust the price to the point where the entrepreneurial profit would be eliminated.

  16. Problem Domain: seeking capital or other resources Dilemma 2: Entrepreneur can engage in opportunistic behavior Dilemma 1: Entrepreneurs are reluctant to fully disclose idea A MARKET FOR LEMONS

  17. What did Ockham do to signal qualilty?

  18. Sample of over 64,000 Swedish males followed between 1994-2001. Folta, T.B.; Delmar, F.; Wennberg, K. 2010. Hybrid Entrepreneurship. Management Science.

  19. Folta, T.B.; Delmar, F.; Wennberg, K. 2010. Hybrid Entrepreneurship. Management Science.

  20. SOLUTIONS TO THE LEMON’S PROBLEM Incentives Staging of capital Social Capital Due Diligence

  21. SOLUTIONS TO A SECOND PROBLEM – EX POST MONITORING Board of Directors Keys to subsequent capital Social Capital

  22. Social ties “interject expectations of trust and reciprocity into the economic exchange that, in turn, activate a cooperative logic of exchange. This logic promotes the transfer of private information and resources … and motivates [both parties] to search for integrative rather than zero-sum outcomes.” Uzzi and Gillespie (1999: 33)

  23. Reputation Information Networks What is Social Capital? Personal Ties Referrals

More Related