1 / 31

Public Property Asset Management Models 22 August 2007 N. Mandindi

Public Property Asset Management Models 22 August 2007 N. Mandindi. Background. Intersite started as a property division of the SA Rail Commuter Corporation Limited in 1991; and, in 1992 established as a separate corporate entity to manage and develop the property portfolio of the SARCC.

meagant
Download Presentation

Public Property Asset Management Models 22 August 2007 N. Mandindi

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Public Property Asset Management Models 22 August 2007 N. Mandindi

  2. Background Intersite started as a property division of the SA Rail Commuter Corporation Limited in 1991; and, in 1992 established as a separate corporate entity to manage and develop the property portfolio of the SARCC.

  3. Institutional Arrangement CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT WITH METRORAIL TO OPERATE THE COMMUTER RAIL SERVICE

  4. PUBLIC PROPERTY PURPOSE The critical success factor of Public Property is its ability to support service delivery through the provision of “fit for purpose” facilities

  5. FUNDAMENTAL DECISIONS PRINCIPLES TO DEAL WITH 1) OWNERSHIP 2) MANAGEMENT

  6. STATE PROPERTY OWNERSHIP • Establishment of Property Agencies (SPV) • Government holds 100% equity • Assets transferred to entities • Asset controlled by financial instruments • Government provide policies & guidelines • Creation of value a requirement • Return expected

  7. STATE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT • Owner/Manager separation – international trend • Ownership/Management duties transferred to and vest in specialists • Government representation – Agency Boards • Reporting requirements – Annual Statements • Specific Performance Parameters • Structuring of entities – Private Sector principals

  8. International Models • Finland • Norway • Sweden • Queensland - Australia

  9. Finland Model State Real Estate Strategy • Decision on Real Estate Strategy in 1998 • Objectives : Efficiency, yield on capital, reduction on facilities costs, increase on property value • Real Estate divided into two groups A) Core, B) non core • Group A transferred to Senate Properties • Group B transferred to Kapiteeli OY

  10. FINNISH MODEL GOVERNMENT OF FINLAND 100% EQUITY IN AGENCY TRANSFEROF PROPERTIES (NON TITLE) 8.1m sqm (11300 buildings) Book value R49.5billion AGENCY SENATE PROPERTIES PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS of AGENCY (5 DIVISIONS) Universities 18 in total 1794 000 sqm Turnover R1.7billion Net income 7.4% Office Premises 1289 000 sqm Turnover R1.3billion Net income 7% Special Premises 1312 000 sqm Turnover R1.2billion Net Income 7.5% Defence Premises 1074 000 sqm Turnover R687.6m Net Income 6.6% Development Premises Development and Selling of vacant land

  11. Kapiteeli OY • Real Estate Investment Company • Property Value 1,2 bn Eu • Portfolio : Business premises, hotels

  12. Senate Properties • Corporatised Entity owned by Ministry of Finance • Property transfers from Department of Education, Justice & Defence • State Budget Reform • Increased attention to Capital Costs • User of Properties responsible for costs (space & facilities) • Concentrated & effective management of property • Economies of scale resulting in cost reduction • Real Estate Investment increase

  13. Senate Properties Portfolio • University Premises • Office Premises • Special Premises • Defence Premises • Developments

  14. Norway 1960 - Directorate of Public Construction and Property was established 1992 - Reorganisation of the directorate – introduction of rent (lease) payment 2000 – Commercial property was separated from Statsbygg The remaining properties of Statsbygg consists of ”purpose” buildings (infrastucture)

  15. NORWEGIAN MODEL GOVERNMENT OF NORWAY 100% EQUITY IN AGENCY TRANSFEROF PROPERTIES (Titles) 2.1m sqm Book Value R37billion AGENCY STATSBYGG/ENTRA PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS OF AGENCY Police Colleges/Universities Municipalities Revenue offices Customs Revenue Roads Courts of Justice Norwegian Petroleum Post Commercial ENTRA EIENDOM 952 000sqm Book Value R16billion Regional Colleges 800 000 sqm Administration buildings 660 000 Special Schools 100 000 Road Stations 75 000 Museums & History blds 54 000 Research Buildings 120 000 Embassies 94 000 Others 197 000 Non- Commercial STATSBYGG 2.1m sqm Book Value R21billion

  16. Norway - Statsbygg • Statsbygg is an administrative body, responsible to the Ministry of Modernisation • Building projects are financed by reinvestment of rent income or by government subsidy • Property management and maintenance is financed by rent income.

  17. Norway - Statsbygg • Statsbygg acts on behalf of the government as consultant and manager in construction and property affairs. • Statsbygg construct buildings for own administration, but also universities, prisons and other ”not-rented” buildings • Statsbygg offers governmental organisations advice suited to their needs, in either new or existing buildings.

  18. Norway – Statsbygg Political directions in the budget • In the Chapter for Statsbygg • Political objectives in the areas of architecture, the environment, cultural heritage and universal design • Initiate and participate in R&D projects inter aliaby using its own building projects as pilot projects to assist in gradually introducing and using digital building models in the construction and property industry throughout a building’s entire lifecycle

  19. Norway - Statsbygg

  20. Norway - Entra • Established July 1st, 2000 • Wholly-owned by the Norwegian Government • The property portfolio is, per Q2 2006, approximately 52.000 m², of which approximately 20% are development projects • The focus segment is office • 120 properties concentrated in the 7 biggest cities in Norway • Approximately 70% of the portfolio is in the Oslo- area • Market value is approximately 15 NOK billion (€ 1,87 billion) (December 2005) • Annual rental income is approximately 1 NOK billion(€ 125 million) • Approximately 120 employees, of which 70% are operational staff who manage the properties

  21. Norway - Entra MARKET POSITION

  22. Norway Entra Portfolio • To maximise the long term recurring income and investment on the portfolio.

  23. Sweden • Fragmentation and specialised focus • State property Transferred to Enties : • Akademiska Hus - Universities • Vassakronen - Defence • Jernhusen – Rail properties • SFV – National Property Board – Forests, Forts & Foreign Affairs

  24. SWEDISH MODEL GOVERNMENT OF SWEDEN 100% EQUITY IN AGENCY TRANSFEROF PROPERTIES ( Titles) 2.15m sqm 1800 buildings Book value R10.5billion AGENCY NATIONAL PROP BOARD (SFV) PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS OF AGENCY 1800 own buildings 320 State owned buildings Free Land (6.5m hectares) Castles and Royal Estates Theatres Museums Embassies Forest and land State owned historical buildings Profitable Properties Non Profitable Properties

  25. National Property Board • SFV owns 1,800 properties in Sweden, totalling 2 million m². • SFV manages 6.5 million hectares (around 16 million acres) of land – one seventh of Sweden’s surface area. • SFV administers state-owned property and land at 73 locations in 69 countries around the world. In 44 of these countries we manage a Swedish Embassy. • SFV manages four items on the UNESCO list: Drottningholm Palace and parts of the Naval Port of Karlskrona; the agricultural landscape in southern Öland; and World Heritage Laponia.

  26. Queensland - Australia Whole of Government approach Q Build Q Fleet User Pay model Strong emphasis on efficiency and high level of maintenance and facilities management

  27. Queensland - Australia

  28. Property Agency - Rationale • Efficiencies • Accountability • Focus on delivery • Business/private sector principles • Introduction of User Pay principle Market related or Controlled system

  29. BENCHMARKING • The Nordic Countries vs South Africa • Property Agency Concept • Implemented more than a decade ago in Norway, Sweden, Finland • Public Works model with overarching mandate over state property

  30. QUESTIONS Capacity building thro institutions of higher learning Design philosophy Role of Public works within Government User pay system ?? Budgeting for Capital works implementations Property Agencies Provincial piloting Develop a critique – Relevance to South Africa – analysis of SA public property including capacity building mechanisms

  31. THANK YOU

More Related