1 / 15

The Top 10 Layout Traps

The Top 10 Layout Traps. #10 Ambiguous Part Substitutions. Some applications are tolerant of fuzzy part substitutions, others must conform exactly to spec. #9 Silk Screen Marking. Diodes are the most common problem Any polarized part Top vs. bottom layer.

meadow
Download Presentation

The Top 10 Layout Traps

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Top 10 Layout Traps

  2. #10 Ambiguous Part Substitutions • Some applications are tolerant of fuzzy part substitutions, others must conform exactly to spec

  3. #9 Silk Screen Marking • Diodes are the most common problem • Any polarized part • Top vs. bottom layer

  4. #8 PCB Storage and Handling Practices • Everything has a shelf life

  5. #7 Excessive Moisture • Greater issue with RoHS-compliant components • Can be an issue in some leaded components and PCBs

  6. #6 RoHS – Sort of • When is a RoHSpassive, not RoHS? • Multiple heat cycles may damage components • FR4 PCBs may also have this issue

  7. #5 Tombstoning • Possible layout causes: • Inner layers • Uneven traces • Large components close by Large part sinks heat Inner layer sinks heat Wide trace sinks heat

  8. # 4 Lead vs. No Lead • Lead vs. no lead • Assembly has to follow the BGA • Lead-free BGA is better on a leaded board than the converse • Reballing may be an option with more costly BGAs

  9. # 3 Parts Library Mismatch • CAD libraries may have land patterns that are close to what is needed but just off enough to cause issues • Metric vs. English

  10. #2 Floating QFNs • Solder paste stencil opening • No big openings Bad Good

  11. #2 Floating QFNs • Ideal if stencil is made correctly • Little chance for tilt

  12. #1 VIA IN PAD • Capillary action = bad • Sucking solder through a straw much worse than sipping cider through a straw • Worse with lead

  13. #1 VIA IN PAD

  14. #1 VIA IN PAD • Solder mask • Better than nothing • May break open

  15. Thank You Want more information? Email dbenson@screamingcircuits.com or visit our blog at www.screamingcircuits.com

More Related