1 / 16

Spatial Data Infrastructure: Comparative Analysis of Publication Volumes and Trends

Explore the publication volumes and differences in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar from 2016 to 2010. Identify most cited works and input differences in spatial data infrastructure research. Reflect on relevance and consistency of results.

mdorsey
Download Presentation

Spatial Data Infrastructure: Comparative Analysis of Publication Volumes and Trends

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Spatial Data InfrastructureGRS-32806 Feedback week 1 exercise 2017

  2. What do you like the most? • Web of science • Scopus • Google Scholar

  3. Volume of publication (2016) • WoS: 2028, 259, 2974, 3112, 4884, 2023, 293,258,216,181,121 • Scopus: 1220, 4998, 4201, 5001, 4203, 693, 727, 754, 782, 975, 1166, 1346 …. • Scholar: 16900, 1370000, 16800, 318000, 1400000, 40000 ….

  4. Publication differences (2017...2010) • WoS259 221 219 290 253 167 78 58 • Scopus1220 1104 967 841 697 1147 374 315 • Scholar1690015300 13800 12000 10200 7290 5980 5100

  5. Input differences • Spatial data infrastructure • Spatial data infrastructures • “Spatial data infrastructure” • SDI • “Spatial data infrastructure” and “SDI” IMPORTANT: 51% of your searches were done without using brackets

  6. Most cited WoS (2017) • Elwood, S., Goodchild, M. F., & Sui, D. Z. (2012). Researching Volunteered Geographic Information: Spatial Data, Geographic Research, and New Social Practice. • FLUXNET: A new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities (Baldocchi et al., 2001).

  7. Most cited Scopus (2017) • Elwood, S., Goodchild, M. F., & Sui, D. Z. (2012). Researching Volunteered Geographic Information: Spatial Data, Geographic Research, and New Social Practice. • Femtocell networks: A survey (Chandrasekhar et al., 2008). (2 times)

  8. Most Cited Scholar (2017) While last year…

  9. Most Cited Scholar (2016) • “The geospatial web: how geobrowsers, social software and the Web 2.0 are shaping the network society” by A Scharl, K Tochtermann in 2009 • The SDI Cookbook, DSD Infrastructures - GSDI/Nebert, 2004 (BOOK)

  10. Most Cited Google Scholar • “GIS worlds: creating spatial data infrastructures” by I Masser and was cited 281 times. • Infrastructures, D. S. D. (2004). the SDI Cookbook. GSDI/Nebert. 378 citations

  11. Most cited Google scolar • GeoData: an introduction to spatial data analysis L Anselin, I Syabri, Y Kho - Geographical analysis, 2006 (1350 times)

  12. Reflection • Highest impact is not necessarily the most relevant one. • Results of Google Scholar are not so consistent.

  13. How new is the topic ? Web of science: 1992,1995,2002,2004 Scopus: 1979,1986,1988,1989,1991,1993,1997 Google Scholar: ?,1990,1991,1992,1997

  14. Reflection • The SDI topic is about 25 years old • The last 10 it has become a topic of scientific interest (now attention is reduced, why) • Some changes over the years, e.g.

  15. Analysis (2) Source: Carolin Wilken & Richmond Kofi Addo

  16. Thank you for your attention

More Related