1 / 7

Low-E cooler baseline decisions:

Low-E cooler baseline decisions:. FNAL’s cooling section “as is” – with weak solenoids, correctors, etc. (to prevent over focusing from ion beam).

mckie
Download Presentation

Low-E cooler baseline decisions:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Low-E cooler baseline decisions: • FNAL’s cooling section “as is” – with weak solenoids, correctors, etc. (to prevent over focusing from ion beam). 2.Cooling section beam pipe size – compatible with existing solenoids and RHIC aperture limitations: 3” OD (S. Tepikian showed that one can get acceptable RHIC optics). 3.BPM’s design for 3” OD pipe (2.87”ID) – to be done based, on FNAL’s design of 2” BPM’s 4.Electron beam transport in/from cooling section - under one ion beam line with an angle towards other ion beam line. 5.Blockhouse/Pelletron location @ IR4 - inside cryo-lines. For detailed presentations on these topics see: http://www.bnl.gov/cad/ecooling/LowEnergyEcooling.asp

  2. Low-E cooler @IR4: Available from FNAL Q3 Electron beam is tilted at an angle – this removes two 90 deg. bends. Now, in addition to FNAL bends, we have: - four 90 degree bends – to be designed! - one 180 degree bend (of most importance!!!)

  3. Aggressive schedule is required to meet final timeline Preliminary cost estimate of the project – November 2009 (done) Estimate of C-AD manpower November 2009 (done) Physics design complete December 2010 Architectural design & layout July2010?-June 2011 Electrical design & layout – November2010-November 2011 Mechanical design & layout – November2010-November 2011 Site preparation – February 2011- March 2012 (14 month) Recycler’s cooler disassembly and transport October 2011-February 2012 (5 month) Electron cooler installation March 2012 –January 2013 (10 month) Commissioning February 2013 -July 2013 (6 month)+ GOAL: Available for FY14 RHIC physics run (starts November 2013). -2014 run: should expect luminosity optimization (partial improvement) -starting 2015 – expect full luminosity improvement

  4. Most C-AD manpower will be needed in FY12 & FY13

  5. Near-term milestones June 2010: • Accurate hardware cost estimate and manpower from controls ! • Accurate hardware cost estimate and manpower from instrumentation ! • Results from first Low-E Physics run • Results from beam dynamics limits at Low-E RHIC June-July 2010: • Updated luminosity projection with cooling (better than estimated previously!) • Updated cost of the project • Review of the above and decisions • End of summer: definite plans from FNAL? • Start of Architectural, Mechanical, Electrical design can be probably delayed until about July 2010? without overall impact on project end date. Fall of 2010 – start of AIP project? • Delayof start of full scale AIP project beyond January 2011 will result in a delay of luminosity improvement with cooling beyond 2014-2015 which may be not consistent with timeline of Low-E RHIC program. NICA program (>2015, physics in 2016?), etc.

  6. Some “near-term” tasks • Transport of electron beam at lower energies; design of bending magnets; evaluating needed control of field quality (X. Chang, J. Kewisch) • Design of turn around (U-turn) of electron beam between cooling sections. Checking preservation of electron beam quality with additional bends, lowest energy (X. Chang, D. Kayran, J. Brodowski) • Electron cooler optics. Electron beam (X. Chang, J. Kewisch) • Ion beam optics for cooling section (S. Tepikian) – done (preliminary) • Careful consideration of “angular budget” in the cooling section from various effects in full energy range of interest (A. Fedotov) – to be presented • Interaction of electron and ion beams. • Undulators “to be or not to be?” (A. Fedotov) - done, to be presented • Updated luminosity projections with cooling (A. Fedotov) – done, to be presented • Cooling section and diagnostics (D. Gassner)

More Related