1 / 16

Building the project base – working in partnership

Building the project base – working in partnership. Michał Olszewski Deputy Director CSF Managing Authority Ministry of Regional Development. Poland today. Short overview. 312 t sq km 38,5 m inhabitants –population is declining due to negative natural growth rate and emigration

mccurley
Download Presentation

Building the project base – working in partnership

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Building the project base – working in partnership Michał Olszewski Deputy Director CSF Managing Authority Ministry of Regional Development

  2. Poland today. Short overview • 312 t sq km • 38,5 m inhabitants –population is declining due to negative natural growth rate and emigration • Member of the EU bordering with Russia, Ukraine and Belarus • Unitary country with 3 tiers of elected regional and local authorities • At regional level – elected and governmental representatives

  3. Poland today. The Diagnosis • Low level of GDP per capita in comparison with EU average • Poland average 52% of EU 25 GDP per capita in PPS (2005) • All 16 NUTS II regions below 75% threshold, 4 of them at the bottom of the European list • Growing disparities – important but.... • Mazowieckie (Warsaw region) one of the fastest growing regions in Europe (but no longer the fastest!) with a speed of 10 pp between 1997-2003 (72,8% in 2003), • Rural regions in danger of falling down - no convergence at all in 3 regions: Opolskie, Lubelskie, Podkarpackie, • Eastern part of Poland is further lagging behind: 33,2%-35,7% and no convergence at all!

  4. Administrative system Structures of regional policy – key players • Government – • Ministry of Regional Development – • Development of strategy for cohesion policy, • Co-ordination of implementation of cohesion policy • Evaluation of cohesion policy • Direct management of all sectoral programs co-funded by the EU • Supervision over regional programs • From 2007 in power to plan the state budget in area of development spendings • Spatial long-term strategy development (from former Governmental Centre for Strategic Studies) and forming a new system of coordination between spatial and regional policy

  5. Structures of regional policy – key players (cont.) • Government – • Other line ministries • Development of sectoral strategies • Implementation of priorities (not separate programs!) within development programs managed by the Ministry of Regional Development • Implementation of programs not fully incorporated to the system of regional policy • Ministry of Economy – Lisbon strategy development and coordination • Ministry of Finance • Overall supervision over public finance system • Paying authority for 2004-2006 but not certification body for 2007-2013 • National Audit body

  6. Structures of regional policy – key players (cont.) • Regions– • Marshal Offices – • Development of strategy for regional policy, • Implementation of their own programs and program coofunded by the state (contracts) and UE (currently one big program from 2007 on 16 Regional Operational Programs) • Coordination between different programs and strategies at regional programs • Evaluation • Voivodeship (governmental) offices • Supervision overregional and local authorities, • Paying and control function (from 2007 only control function)

  7. Structures of regional policy – key players (cont.) • Other players - beneficiaries • Big cities • Importance is growing thanks to money • Social and economic partners – • Weak so far but their importance is growing • Different territorial lobbies • Agriculture and rural areas lobby • Old traditional industry lobby (Coal) • Eastern Areas • Transport • Sustainable development and ecology

  8. Polish projects

  9. Focus on investments

  10. Main beneficiary – public sector

  11. Concentration of projects on big cities

  12. EU contribution per capita in złAverage per capita for Poland - 1277 zł

  13. Capacity of the municipalities

  14. How to stimulate project pipeline?

  15. Partnership possibilities • Municipalities Associations • Local infrastructure • Municipality – NGO • ESF projects • accessibility to external financing to enterprise • Municipality – Enterprise • PPP • R&D Unit – Enterprise • R&D Projects • Municipality – R&D Sector • Technological park,

  16. Polish best practices • Project pipeline – under Phare project • Training • Manuals • Advisors • Technical assistance • Advisors • Training • Model projects • Manual • Training • Pre-assessment • Partnership conferences

More Related