E N D
1. How Access Pertains to Disproportionality and English Language Learners Wendy Bauman
The Access Center:
Improving Outcomes for All Students K-8
Hi, I知 Wendy Bauman and I知 part of the Access Center
Today I値l be talking to you about how access to the general education curriculum is relevant to minorities and ELLS in special education, specifically disproprotionalityHi, I知 Wendy Bauman and I知 part of the Access Center
Today I値l be talking to you about how access to the general education curriculum is relevant to minorities and ELLS in special education, specifically disproprotionality
2. The Access Center: Improving Outcomes for All Students K-8Located at the American Institutes for Research1000 Thomas Jefferson St. NW, Washington, DC 20007Ph: 202-944-5300 TTY: 877-334-3499 Fax: 202-944-5454e-mail: accesscenter@air.org website: www.k8accesscenter.org Before I do that
Brief overview of the Access Center (will talk about it in more details later in the presentation):
national technical assistance center funded by OSEP. We池e currently in our first year of five years.
We focus on access to the gen ed curriculum for students with disabilities K-8
We have a number of strategies and resources as well has have a comprehensive website
Before starting this presentation:
prefer to take questions at the end (unless its one of clarification)
Point out the display board and mention the materials I致e brought
Acknowledge that minorities and ELLS have distinct concerns and characteristics but for the purpose of this presentation, due to time constraints, they are grouped together. Differentiated where possible but they do have many overlapping concerns/considerations to be made
We池e only 7 months old so we池e still developing our resources and strategies. So some areas of our work are more developed in our work
Before I do that
Brief overview of the Access Center (will talk about it in more details later in the presentation):
national technical assistance center funded by OSEP. We池e currently in our first year of five years.
We focus on access to the gen ed curriculum for students with disabilities K-8
We have a number of strategies and resources as well has have a comprehensive website
Before starting this presentation:
prefer to take questions at the end (unless its one of clarification)
Point out the display board and mention the materials I致e brought
Acknowledge that minorities and ELLS have distinct concerns and characteristics but for the purpose of this presentation, due to time constraints, they are grouped together. Differentiated where possible but they do have many overlapping concerns/considerations to be made
We池e only 7 months old so we池e still developing our resources and strategies. So some areas of our work are more developed in our work
3. Presentation Outline Define access to the general education curriculum
Discuss the relationship between Access, Disproportionality and English Language Learners (ELLS)
Explain how the Access Center can help to improve access to the general education curriculum for students with disabilities
Question and Answer/ Strategy sharing period
This presentation will be divided into 3 sections
Defining access both through how it is defined in IDEA 97 and also how the Access Center has conceptualized access
In this, I値l be talking about how issues of access to the general education arise in different areas of education, how the specific concerns of minorities and ELLS in special education are related to these access issues and some strategic interventions that can facilitate better access for these students
Talk about the structure and services of the Access Center and explain how we can assist teachers, schools, districts, and states improve access to the general education curriculum for their students with disabilities, including minorities and ELLS
While our work doesn稚 focus exclusively on disproportionality concerns, minorities, or ELLS, ensuring access is very much tied to these populations as often students who have limited access are from diverse backgrounds.
Also, room for questions and answers at endThis presentation will be divided into 3 sections
Defining access both through how it is defined in IDEA 97 and also how the Access Center has conceptualized access
In this, I値l be talking about how issues of access to the general education arise in different areas of education, how the specific concerns of minorities and ELLS in special education are related to these access issues and some strategic interventions that can facilitate better access for these students
Talk about the structure and services of the Access Center and explain how we can assist teachers, schools, districts, and states improve access to the general education curriculum for their students with disabilities, including minorities and ELLS
While our work doesn稚 focus exclusively on disproportionality concerns, minorities, or ELLS, ensuring access is very much tied to these populations as often students who have limited access are from diverse backgrounds.
Also, room for questions and answers at end
4. What is Access? In Individual with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 1997,
300.26 (b)(3)(iii)ァ Specially-designed instruction means adapting, as appropriate to the needs of an eligible child under this part, the content, methodology, or delivery of instruction-
(i) To address the unique needs of the child that result from the child's disability; and
(ii) To ensure access of the child to the general curriculum, so that he or she can meet the educational standards within the jurisdiction of the public agency that apply to all children.
IDEA 97 emphasizes that students with disabilities are to participate and progress in the general education curriculum
The 堵eneral education curriculum as used in the IDEA 97 amendments refers to the curriculum that is offered to non-disabled students. this is how the AC has operationalized it as well
These mandates are furthered in NCLB as it provisions on accountability and student outcome data. In addition, this act includes helps to identify the types of curriculum that an be used
IDEA 97 emphasizes that students with disabilities are to participate and progress in the general education curriculum
The 堵eneral education curriculum as used in the IDEA 97 amendments refers to the curriculum that is offered to non-disabled students. this is how the AC has operationalized it as well
These mandates are furthered in NCLB as it provisions on accountability and student outcome data. In addition, this act includes helps to identify the types of curriculum that an be used
5. What is Access? The Access Center痴 Concept of Access
A Bridge to Affective Access
Connecting research to practice to progress
The Access Center痴 Framework
Active engagement in learning the content and skills that define the general education curriculum. We as a center have operationalized the concept of access in two ways:
We see access as a bridge- connecting research to practice to progress:
Using knowledge about research based instruction and implementing it in the classroom and then scaling up and being able to measure student progress
2) created a framework that we use. The core component of our frame work is that access to the gen ed curriculum occurs when students are actively engaging in learning the content and skills that define the gen ed curriculum. We have found that access is most likely occurring when the following indicators are present
1) the general education curriculum is operationalized in terms of appropriate instructional and learning goals for individual students with disabilities, including appropriate scope and sequence;
2) appropriate research-based instructional methods and practices are being used that have a track record of helping students with disabilities learn general education content and skills;
3) appropriate research-based materials and media are being used that have evidence documenting their effectiveness in helping students with disabilities learn general education content and skills;
4) research-based supports and accommodations are being used that have a track record of helping students with disabilities learn general education content and skills; and
appropriate tools and procedures are used for assessing and documenting whether students with disabilities are meeting high standards and achieving their instructional goals.
We as a center have operationalized the concept of access in two ways:
We see access as a bridge- connecting research to practice to progress:
Using knowledge about research based instruction and implementing it in the classroom and then scaling up and being able to measure student progress
2) created a framework that we use. The core component of our frame work is that access to the gen ed curriculum occurs when students are actively engaging in learning the content and skills that define the gen ed curriculum. We have found that access is most likely occurring when the following indicators are present
1) the general education curriculum is operationalized in terms of appropriate instructional and learning goals for individual students with disabilities, including appropriate scope and sequence;
2) appropriate research-based instructional methods and practices are being used that have a track record of helping students with disabilities learn general education content and skills;
3) appropriate research-based materials and media are being used that have evidence documenting their effectiveness in helping students with disabilities learn general education content and skills;
4) research-based supports and accommodations are being used that have a track record of helping students with disabilities learn general education content and skills; and
appropriate tools and procedures are used for assessing and documenting whether students with disabilities are meeting high standards and achieving their instructional goals.
6. What is Access? Importance:
Mandated by IDEA 97
Carried forth in No Child Left Behind, 2002
Inclusion is about placement; access is about services
Why is Access Important?
Mandated by IDEA: students with disabilities, have the same rights to a high quality education
NCLB痴 provisions about student accountability and student outcome data help to hold schools and districts accountable for including inclusive environments as students with disabilities
Focuses on services and and supports for children. Inclusion is placement, access is about services:
Not just about the setting: Nolet and McLaughlin (2000): access to the general education curriculum in more than just being present. It requires the providing necessary supports to they will benefit from the instruction.
Access does not only pertain to students within the general education classroom. Access is an issue across all settings, including more restrictive environments. Tomlinson (1999): emphasized consideration of access in self-contained classrooms too often expectations for struggling learners decrease, materials are simplified, pace slows
Why is Access Important?
Mandated by IDEA: students with disabilities, have the same rights to a high quality education
NCLB痴 provisions about student accountability and student outcome data help to hold schools and districts accountable for including inclusive environments as students with disabilities
Focuses on services and and supports for children. Inclusion is placement, access is about services:
Not just about the setting: Nolet and McLaughlin (2000): access to the general education curriculum in more than just being present. It requires the providing necessary supports to they will benefit from the instruction.
Access does not only pertain to students within the general education classroom. Access is an issue across all settings, including more restrictive environments. Tomlinson (1999): emphasized consideration of access in self-contained classrooms too often expectations for struggling learners decrease, materials are simplified, pace slows
7. Access, Disproportionality, and ELLS How does access to the general education curriculum relate to disproportionality and to the needs of English Language Learners? 2nd part of presentation:
Here痴 the key question to this presentation [read]
Concerns about access cut across all aspects of education. In order to focus this presentation a bit, the following areas will touched upon for this presentation 2nd part of presentation:
Here痴 the key question to this presentation [read]
Concerns about access cut across all aspects of education. In order to focus this presentation a bit, the following areas will touched upon for this presentation
8. Access, Disproportionality, and ELLS Areas to be addressed:
Identification for special education services
Placement in education settings and services
Classroom Instruction
Highly Qualified Personnel
Assessment Content and Methods These are areas in education in which decisions can be made that adversely affect a student痴 access to the general education curriculum
Look at each of them separately toThese are areas in education in which decisions can be made that adversely affect a student痴 access to the general education curriculum
Look at each of them separately to
9. Access, Disproportionality, and ELLS What kind of decisions are inhibiting access?
Specific concerns related to minorities and ELLS
Strategic Interventions
For each of the five education areas, the following points will be addressed
what kinds of decisions are being made that can inhibit access
How are these decisions related to the specific needs of minority and ELLS students
Examples of strategies and programs that can be implemented to improve students access
Ex. The What Works Clearinghouse, a federally funded center, has come out with their list of evidence reports for the first year and one of them include ELLS
You all probably have lots of suggestions as well, that I壇 love to hear. We can share them at the end of this presentationFor each of the five education areas, the following points will be addressed
what kinds of decisions are being made that can inhibit access
How are these decisions related to the specific needs of minority and ELLS students
Examples of strategies and programs that can be implemented to improve students access
Ex. The What Works Clearinghouse, a federally funded center, has come out with their list of evidence reports for the first year and one of them include ELLS
You all probably have lots of suggestions as well, that I壇 love to hear. We can share them at the end of this presentation
10. Identification Issue of Access
Removal from the general education classroom
Lowered expectations and goals Description: Identification is the process in which children are identified as in need of special education services, and more specifically the types of services they need depending on their disability. Misidentification (is this the accepted term to use?) can occur when students from racial and ethnic minority groups are inappropriately recognized as students with a disability and are placed in special education settings that remove them from the general education curriculum. Learning goals established for these students may be based erroneously on the inappropriate diagnosis of a disability, as would be instructional methods and assessment techniques, thus, further pulling them from engagement in general education content and instructional and assessment methods
Description: Identification is the process in which children are identified as in need of special education services, and more specifically the types of services they need depending on their disability. Misidentification (is this the accepted term to use?) can occur when students from racial and ethnic minority groups are inappropriately recognized as students with a disability and are placed in special education settings that remove them from the general education curriculum. Learning goals established for these students may be based erroneously on the inappropriate diagnosis of a disability, as would be instructional methods and assessment techniques, thus, further pulling them from engagement in general education content and instructional and assessment methods
11. Identification Disproportionality and ELLS
Cultural and linguistic difficulties or differences mistaken for a disability
Cultural disconnect between students and teacher
Lower Expectations
Lack of Advocate
Materials
Assessment How decision that influence access can be specifically related to minorities and ELLS:
Ex for immigrants, language difficulty often interpreted as a language disability
Behavioral expressions seen as indication of a disability rather than as culture specific
- example from Heidi痴 chapter
prejudice/stereotypes and/or lack of knowledge
Families not knowledgeable, encouraged, or able (language or time barriers) to advocate for their child to participate in educational experiences that improve access.
The materials and tools used to assess a child for special education services are not culturally sensitive
- example from Mom
How decision that influence access can be specifically related to minorities and ELLS:
Ex for immigrants, language difficulty often interpreted as a language disability
Behavioral expressions seen as indication of a disability rather than as culture specific
- example from Heidi痴 chapter
prejudice/stereotypes and/or lack of knowledge
Families not knowledgeable, encouraged, or able (language or time barriers) to advocate for their child to participate in educational experiences that improve access.
The materials and tools used to assess a child for special education services are not culturally sensitive
- example from Mom
12. Identification Strategic Interventions
Prereferral Interventions
Teacher Assistance Teams (TAT)
Skills Promoted through Arts, Reading and Knowledge (SPARK)
Prereferral Assessment Model (PAM) TAT- supports general education teachers through creating teams.
SPARK for early childhood; literary based; good results for those learning English
PAM- systematic screening model for academic and behavior problems
TAT- supports general education teachers through creating teams.
SPARK for early childhood; literary based; good results for those learning English
PAM- systematic screening model for academic and behavior problems
13. Placement Issue of Access
Learning goals, instructional methods and assessment techniques may not be as strenuous
Specific disability categories more like to be placed in more restrictive environment
PLACEMENT = nature of the special education services or program in which a child with a disability is placed. Examples include a general education classroom with additional supports, pullout services, or a self-contained classroom.
Access is limited when misclassifications are made
Misclassification = inaccurately labeling students who have been identified for special education services and therefore providing inappropriate services; often placed in more restrictive environments that needed
(from the Civil Rights Project) 80-90% of MR and 70+% of ED educated in resource rooms or substantially separate settings; about 56% of LD in full inclusion (pulled out less than 21% of school day); PLACEMENT = nature of the special education services or program in which a child with a disability is placed. Examples include a general education classroom with additional supports, pullout services, or a self-contained classroom.
Access is limited when misclassifications are made
Misclassification = inaccurately labeling students who have been identified for special education services and therefore providing inappropriate services; often placed in more restrictive environments that needed
(from the Civil Rights Project) 80-90% of MR and 70+% of ED educated in resource rooms or substantially separate settings; about 56% of LD in full inclusion (pulled out less than 21% of school day);
14. Placement Disproportionality and ELLS
Type of placements
Incongruous services Statistics show students from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds are disproportionately placed in more restrictive environments further inhibiting their participation and engagement in general education curriculum, goals, and instructional opportunities
- overrepresentation of ED and MR increases risk of blacks in separate settings; most racial disparity within MR is mild MR (vs moderately or severe)
Full inclusion: 55% of white students with disabilities, 42.6% of Hispanics; 37.2% blacks
Substantially separate: 15.9% of whites, 27.8% of Hispanics; 32.7% Blacks
Services not matched to actual needs; probably due to placement errors
Crockett and Kaufman: restrictive placements -> likely to receive unequal services
Statistics show students from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds are disproportionately placed in more restrictive environments further inhibiting their participation and engagement in general education curriculum, goals, and instructional opportunities
- overrepresentation of ED and MR increases risk of blacks in separate settings; most racial disparity within MR is mild MR (vs moderately or severe)
Full inclusion: 55% of white students with disabilities, 42.6% of Hispanics; 37.2% blacks
Substantially separate: 15.9% of whites, 27.8% of Hispanics; 32.7% Blacks
Services not matched to actual needs; probably due to placement errors
Crockett and Kaufman: restrictive placements -> likely to receive unequal services
15. Placement Strategic Interventions
More sensitive assessments
Grouping Strategies
Part Time Placements Sensitive assessments: include measures/tools that account for diverse learners; talk more about this in later section
ex. IEP meetings minority parents don稚 understand and/or feel empowered so defer to the school for decisions
Grouping Strategies: (Sharon Vaughn)
organize students into learning clusters that facilitate their engagement and participation; learning groups comprised of students of varying ages, achievement levels, and disabilities (Vaughn). positively impact upon student learning and minimize the necessity to pull the student out of a classroom setting to receive more intensive instructional interventions
ex. Used a lot for reading; research found that stronger readers sensitive to needs of lower readers and didn稚 express concern with having to help them; LD students expressed appreciation for groups where can get easily obtain help from peers
Placement utilize pull out services, paraprofessionals, remedial assistance within current setting for part of day
ex. Work with special educators to design interventions that can be used in the gen ed classroomSensitive assessments: include measures/tools that account for diverse learners; talk more about this in later section
ex. IEP meetings minority parents don稚 understand and/or feel empowered so defer to the school for decisions
Grouping Strategies: (Sharon Vaughn)
organize students into learning clusters that facilitate their engagement and participation; learning groups comprised of students of varying ages, achievement levels, and disabilities (Vaughn). positively impact upon student learning and minimize the necessity to pull the student out of a classroom setting to receive more intensive instructional interventions
ex. Used a lot for reading; research found that stronger readers sensitive to needs of lower readers and didn稚 express concern with having to help them; LD students expressed appreciation for groups where can get easily obtain help from peers
Placement utilize pull out services, paraprofessionals, remedial assistance within current setting for part of day
ex. Work with special educators to design interventions that can be used in the gen ed classroom
16. Instruction Issue of Access
Not able to accommodate different learning styles
Teaching styles and materials
Inherent curricular barriers Affecting access within instruction are
First two- can be due to lack of training, knowledge, backgroundAffecting access within instruction are
First two- can be due to lack of training, knowledge, background
17. Instruction Disproportionality and ELLS
Ability to adapt to the needs of diverse learners
Linguistic and cultural disconnect with classroom content, materials, or instruction
Teaching Styles
involves 1st recognizing diverse needs (such as English as second lang) and 2nd adapting teaching appropriately
Ex. Pumpkin pie vs. sweet potato pie at Thanksgiving (Bransford, How People Learn)
Ex. Role of questioning different about racial/ethnic groups (Harry, Allen, McLaughilin, 1995 in Bransford, How People Learn)
whites: 徒nown-answer questions; person asking the question knows the information required to answer correctly
Afr-Am: more likely analogy or story-telling experiences, where not prior correct answer
Additional studies similar differences amoung Hispanics and Asian-Americans (Arreaga-Mayer, 1998) involves 1st recognizing diverse needs (such as English as second lang) and 2nd adapting teaching appropriately
Ex. Pumpkin pie vs. sweet potato pie at Thanksgiving (Bransford, How People Learn)
Ex. Role of questioning different about racial/ethnic groups (Harry, Allen, McLaughilin, 1995 in Bransford, How People Learn)
whites: 徒nown-answer questions; person asking the question knows the information required to answer correctly
Afr-Am: more likely analogy or story-telling experiences, where not prior correct answer
Additional studies similar differences amoung Hispanics and Asian-Americans (Arreaga-Mayer, 1998)
18. Instruction Strategic Interventions
Culturally appropriate pedagogy
Pre-existing knowledge
Learning Strategies
Peer Assisted Learning Strategies (PALS)
Universal Design (UD) Integrate diverse cultures into overall academic program;
Ex. Banks Content Integration
Knowledge is shaped by social and cultural experiences; based on SOL principles
Ex. Fish is a Fish
Prime background knowledge (McLaughlin)
3) Help learn information and solve problems; Don Deshler痴 work. Engage students through active learning
Ex. Graphic organizers, mnemonic devises: to improve memory; tools to better encode information so can retrieve it easier; 3 strategies: keyword, pegword, letter
4) Pairing students through structured learning activities
5) Approach to designing env and products so they can be used by the widest range of students w/o adaptation
Integrate diverse cultures into overall academic program;
Ex. Banks Content Integration
Knowledge is shaped by social and cultural experiences; based on SOL principles
Ex. Fish is a Fish
Prime background knowledge (McLaughlin)
3) Help learn information and solve problems; Don Deshler痴 work. Engage students through active learning
Ex. Graphic organizers, mnemonic devises: to improve memory; tools to better encode information so can retrieve it easier; 3 strategies: keyword, pegword, letter
4) Pairing students through structured learning activities
5) Approach to designing env and products so they can be used by the widest range of students w/o adaptation
19. Highly Qualified Personnel Issue of Access
Insufficient training for teaching diverse students
Lack of Support
Lack of Certified Special Educators
滴ighly Qualified Personnel in NCLB = certified; demonstrate proficiency in subj matter
So if don稚 fit the 杜ode then they are special ed or just don稚 teach them as much- not getting the whole curriculum; also about not having training on how to use appropriate tools
Support from school, district, state
Stats??滴ighly Qualified Personnel in NCLB = certified; demonstrate proficiency in subj matter
So if don稚 fit the 杜ode then they are special ed or just don稚 teach them as much- not getting the whole curriculum; also about not having training on how to use appropriate tools
Support from school, district, state
Stats??
20. Highly Quality Personnel Disproportionality and ELLS
Shortage of culturally and linguistically diverse educators
Insufficient understanding of diverse students
Insufficient understanding of diverse teaching materials and strategies 1) As of 1995, about 85% of teacher education students where white, 7% black, 4 Hispanic; undergrad special edu programs, 87.8% white, 6.6% black, 3.1 Hispanic; I.e about teaching professionals 14% diverse vs. about 30% of students are diverse
2) Not trained to teach diverse learners; studies have show that only about 10 18% of programs include sufficient multicultural materials/training
3) Not know about diverse books. Ex. SPARK curriculum; Core Knowledge by E.J Hirsh1) As of 1995, about 85% of teacher education students where white, 7% black, 4 Hispanic; undergrad special edu programs, 87.8% white, 6.6% black, 3.1 Hispanic; I.e about teaching professionals 14% diverse vs. about 30% of students are diverse
2) Not trained to teach diverse learners; studies have show that only about 10 18% of programs include sufficient multicultural materials/training
3) Not know about diverse books. Ex. SPARK curriculum; Core Knowledge by E.J Hirsh
21. Highly Quality Personnel Strategic Interventions
Teacher Training Programs
Professional Development Activities
Community Involvement Activities
Course work on diverse cultures and how to address diverse needs in the classroom
Focus on ethnic/racial groups in the community
Ex. Include parents
For both inservice/preservice, how and where to get support and/or resourcesCourse work on diverse cultures and how to address diverse needs in the classroom
Focus on ethnic/racial groups in the community
Ex. Include parents
For both inservice/preservice, how and where to get support and/or resources
22. Assessment Issue of Access
Testing methods and content can lead to inaccurate results
With NCLB provisions, students with disabilities must be included
Thus leading to restricted access to the general education curriculum
NCLB: now being held accountable need to show AYP so need access to the curriculum Thus leading to restricted access to the general education curriculum
NCLB: now being held accountable need to show AYP so need access to the curriculum
23. Assessment Disproportionality and ELLS
Insensitive tools and methods
Language and cultural barriers Not culturally diverse, appropriate; tools, including some standardized assessments, often aren稚 normed on populations of diverse learners
斗east bias assessment (from speech and language pathology lit) need to understand person痴 culturea and language and how it can impact the process
Ex. If limited English and the test is in English then the child痴 English ability is being tested, not their content or skill knowledge (NAPE Principal book) Not culturally diverse, appropriate; tools, including some standardized assessments, often aren稚 normed on populations of diverse learners
斗east bias assessment (from speech and language pathology lit) need to understand person痴 culturea and language and how it can impact the process
Ex. If limited English and the test is in English then the child痴 English ability is being tested, not their content or skill knowledge (NAPE Principal book)
24. Assessment Strategic Interventions
Curriculum Based Assessment
Multiple Assessment Approach
Include UD Principles Frequently administered brief tests (probes) that measure specific skills. To monitor progress and help with practical data-based decision-making; measures student痴 growth individual (not against peers); probes can be teacher generated or from outside sources; involving child in charting progress can be incentive for them
Using multiple types of assessment (standardized tests, classroom tests, qualitative measures, group projects) to 鍍riangulate data for more accurate and holistic picture of student ability and progress
Measure accurately without compromising validity -Often through computer based; include accommodations (reading aloud, test magnification, use of keyboard to respond)
Mention something about NCLB?
- more important know with NCLB bec now need to include st w/ dis for accountability to show yearly progress; only 5% from a school can be excludedFrequently administered brief tests (probes) that measure specific skills. To monitor progress and help with practical data-based decision-making; measures student痴 growth individual (not against peers); probes can be teacher generated or from outside sources; involving child in charting progress can be incentive for them
Using multiple types of assessment (standardized tests, classroom tests, qualitative measures, group projects) to 鍍riangulate data for more accurate and holistic picture of student ability and progress
Measure accurately without compromising validity -Often through computer based; include accommodations (reading aloud, test magnification, use of keyboard to respond)
Mention something about NCLB?
- more important know with NCLB bec now need to include st w/ dis for accountability to show yearly progress; only 5% from a school can be excluded
25. To Recap Looked at the areas of identification, placement, instruction, personnel, and assessment
Discussed issues of access and how related to disproportionality and ELLS
Offered strategic interventions to help improve access for students Thus far, we
Now that we致e identified the needs, concerns, and possible strategies for improving access, what kind of support and assistance is out there to help individuals, districts, and states improve access to the general education curriculum for students with disabilities, and specifically minority students and ELLS?
What I致e touched upon thus far are the types of concerns the Access Center addresses through our technical assistance. We act as a resource for states, districts, and practitioners who are working to improve access to the general education curriculum for students with disabilities. Our center痴 resources and strategies enhance access to the general education for all students, including those from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds.Thus far, we
Now that we致e identified the needs, concerns, and possible strategies for improving access, what kind of support and assistance is out there to help individuals, districts, and states improve access to the general education curriculum for students with disabilities, and specifically minority students and ELLS?
What I致e touched upon thus far are the types of concerns the Access Center addresses through our technical assistance. We act as a resource for states, districts, and practitioners who are working to improve access to the general education curriculum for students with disabilities. Our center痴 resources and strategies enhance access to the general education for all students, including those from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds.
26. How the Access Center can Help National technical assistance center
Funded by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP)
Overarching Aim:
To help state educators, TA systems, districts, schools, and individuals build capacity to enhance the ability of students with disabilities to engage in and learn from the general education curriculum So now I値l talk to you a bit about how what we at the Access Center do and how we can be of assistance to those who dealing with the complex issue of how to help their students with disabilities access the general education curriculumSo now I値l talk to you a bit about how what we at the Access Center do and how we can be of assistance to those who dealing with the complex issue of how to help their students with disabilities access the general education curriculum
27. How the Access Center can Help Located in Washington DC at the American Institutes for Research
Principal Investigator:
James Hamilton, Ph.D.
Project Co-Directors:
Judy Shanley, Ph.D.
Don Dailey, Ph.D.
28. Target Audiences State and local administrators
State and local educators
National, state, and local TA providers
Parents and families
29. Our Framework for Access
A Bridge to Affective Access
-Connecting research to practice to progress
The Access Center痴 Framework
- Active engagement in learning the content and skills that define the general education curriculum.
- Factors that influence access
We as a center have operationalized the concept of access in two ways:
We see access as a bridge- connecting research to practice to progress:
Using knowledge about research based instruction and implementing it in the classroom and then scaling up and being able to measure student progress
2) created a framework that we use. The core component of our frame work is that access to the gen ed curriculum occurs when students are actively engaging in learning the content and skills that define the gen ed curriculum. We have found that access is most likely occurring when the following indicators are present
1) the general education curriculum is operationalized in terms of appropriate instructional and learning goals for individual students with disabilities, including appropriate scope and sequence;
2) appropriate research-based instructional methods and practices are being used that have a track record of helping students with disabilities learn general education content and skills;
3) appropriate research-based materials and media are being used that have evidence documenting their effectiveness in helping students with disabilities learn general education content and skills;
4) research-based supports and accommodations are being used that have a track record of helping students with disabilities learn general education content and skills; and
appropriate tools and procedures are used for assessing and documenting whether students with disabilities are meeting high standards and achieving their instructional goals.
We as a center have operationalized the concept of access in two ways:
We see access as a bridge- connecting research to practice to progress:
Using knowledge about research based instruction and implementing it in the classroom and then scaling up and being able to measure student progress
2) created a framework that we use. The core component of our frame work is that access to the gen ed curriculum occurs when students are actively engaging in learning the content and skills that define the gen ed curriculum. We have found that access is most likely occurring when the following indicators are present
1) the general education curriculum is operationalized in terms of appropriate instructional and learning goals for individual students with disabilities, including appropriate scope and sequence;
2) appropriate research-based instructional methods and practices are being used that have a track record of helping students with disabilities learn general education content and skills;
3) appropriate research-based materials and media are being used that have evidence documenting their effectiveness in helping students with disabilities learn general education content and skills;
4) research-based supports and accommodations are being used that have a track record of helping students with disabilities learn general education content and skills; and
appropriate tools and procedures are used for assessing and documenting whether students with disabilities are meeting high standards and achieving their instructional goals.
30. Our Customized Assistance Three types of services:
Web-based
Technical Assistance Liaison Activities
Access Exchange Community 1) Website:
Training, Materials, and Resources
- six areas: (background information on access,goals and alignment with standards, classroom curriculum and materials, instructional methods and strategies, connecting research to practice, supports and accommodations and assessment and accountability)
- Different types: currently Information Briefs, FAQs, and glossary of key special education and access terminology.
2. Working on more extensive reports, training modules among others
3. Free, interactive features: online expert chats, threaded discussions, and a listserv
We池e continuously developing new tools, publications, and products that are reliable and practical
2) With the 6 RRCS work w/ states and districts in each region through:
Direct Consultation: Working with a few states individually that are being identified through the RRC network on their specific needs concerning access
Customized Resources: The center can provide materials and media that correspond to specific needs: synthesize and present information about effective research, practices, products, and people.
3) Access Exchange Communities
- Communities of practice; we provide live and virtual networking opportunities to for them to collaborate
1) Website:
Training, Materials, and Resources
- six areas: (background information on access,goals and alignment with standards, classroom curriculum and materials, instructional methods and strategies, connecting research to practice, supports and accommodations and assessment and accountability)
- Different types: currently Information Briefs, FAQs, and glossary of key special education and access terminology.
2. Working on more extensive reports, training modules among others
3. Free, interactive features: online expert chats, threaded discussions, and a listserv
We池e continuously developing new tools, publications, and products that are reliable and practical
2) With the 6 RRCS work w/ states and districts in each region through:
Direct Consultation: Working with a few states individually that are being identified through the RRC network on their specific needs concerning access
Customized Resources: The center can provide materials and media that correspond to specific needs: synthesize and present information about effective research, practices, products, and people.
3) Access Exchange Communities
- Communities of practice; we provide live and virtual networking opportunities to for them to collaborate
31. Our Partners Regional Resource Center Network
Mountain Plains Regional Resource Center
Center for Applied Special Technology (CAST)
Council for Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) From website info;
Distinction between RRC network and MPRRC
Note: acknowledge SERRCFrom website info;
Distinction between RRC network and MPRRC
Note: acknowledge SERRC
32. Structure of the Access Center Regional Technical Assistance Liaison Teams aligned with the 6 Regional Resource Centers
Content teams that focus on specific content areas as well as overarching educational areas Define Technical Assistance Liaison: A.C. and RRC staff who has taken on the role as provider of technical assistance. TA= support provided thru info dissemination, online resources, consultants, regional/com resources, etc. in response to an identified need, request for info, help to solve problem
The six regions: Mid-South, Western, Great Lakes, Mountain Plains, Southeast, Northeast
content: reading, math, science
overarching: Assessment and Accountability, Research to practice, Assistive technology (including universal design), Support and accommodations, Classroom management, Goals and alignment to standards, Legislative/regulatory information Define Technical Assistance Liaison: A.C. and RRC staff who has taken on the role as provider of technical assistance. TA= support provided thru info dissemination, online resources, consultants, regional/com resources, etc. in response to an identified need, request for info, help to solve problem
The six regions: Mid-South, Western, Great Lakes, Mountain Plains, Southeast, Northeast
content: reading, math, science
overarching: Assessment and Accountability, Research to practice, Assistive technology (including universal design), Support and accommodations, Classroom management, Goals and alignment to standards, Legislative/regulatory information
33. Website www.k8accesscenter.org
our T,M,R can be found here as well as the online features (chat, threaded discussion, listserv). In addition, have testimonials from practitioners in the field about access and how its working in their schools
lots of info, easy to use. Continuously adding to it our T,M,R can be found here as well as the online features (chat, threaded discussion, listserv). In addition, have testimonials from practitioners in the field about access and how its working in their schools
lots of info, easy to use. Continuously adding to it
36. The Access Center: Improving Outcomes for All Students K-8Located at the American Institutes for Research1000 Thomas Jefferson St. NW, Washington, DC 20007Ph: 202-403-5000 TTY: 877-334-3499 Fax: 202-403-5001e-mail: accesscenter@air.org website: www.k8accesscenter.org
37. This content was developed by staff at The Access Center: Improving Outcomes for All Students K-8, funded by U. S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs and housed at the American Institutes for Research. Retrieved [today's date], from the World Wide Web: http://www.k8accesscenter.org