1 / 7

Micrometeorological Techniques

Micrometeorological Techniques. Surface Energy Balance R n - G = H + LE. Historical Perspective. Major advances in 1950s using Osborne Reynolds, (1895) Reynolds averaging eddy covariance Fast response hot –wire anemometer & thermometry

may-buckner
Download Presentation

Micrometeorological Techniques

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Micrometeorological Techniques Surface Energy Balance Rn- G = H + LE

  2. Historical Perspective • Major advances in 1950s using Osborne Reynolds, (1895) Reynolds averaging eddy covariance • Fast response hot –wire anemometer & thermometry • Efforts focused on developing theory, instrumentation & methods • Test scaling concepts of M-O • Spectral/statistical properties of turb. SBL • Osborne Reynolds, 1895, Reynolds averaging – EC • Fickian diffusion led early fluid mech. (Prandtl, Taylor, Bowen) to propose flux-gradient app. (1920’s) • Monin-Obukov 1940s, theoretical principles for computing fluxes in sfc layer • Kolmogorov, statistician, theory for interpreting turb. decay

  3. Lysimeters • Simple in concept • Direct meas. of E • Change of mass • Can be accurate • No assumptions • No gradients • No diffusivities • Relatively small area (0.05-40 m2) • Does it represent surface of interest? • Not versatile • Baseline data

  4. Bowen Ratio LE = Rn– G/1+β • Inexpensive • Simple/practical • Reasonably versatile • Soil water is avail. • No aerodynamic data minimal post processing • Can be reliable • Neutral conditions • Small gradients • kh, ke not equal • Accuracy – Rn and G and true gradients of T and e

  5. Eddy Covariance • Physically based • Direct meas. of E • Versatile, easy, robust • Does not rely on assumptions @ eddy diffusivity • Highly accurate/inaccurate • High frequency data • Expensive • Corrections required • Post processing intensive

  6. Scintillometers • Optical device • Meas. small fluctuations in refractive index of air (T, P e) • Versatile • Robust • Ease of operation • Well suited for heterogeneous • H integrated transect • Expensive • Needs u* • Valid M-O assumptions • E is a residual from SEB

  7. Summary • Theoretical development • Instrumentation to test the theory • Multiple systems/methods - all try for LE • Spatial and temporal issues • Surface variability • Sufficient number of spatially representative sites • Continuity of data flow • Uniformity of meas. and processing QA/QC

More Related