1 / 9

Report of Working Group on Social Progress

Report of Working Group on Social Progress. Philippine Development Forum Davao City, March 8, 2005. Challenge of yesterday’s plenary. If we are to focus on effective execution of good plans, what should we be talking about?

maxim
Download Presentation

Report of Working Group on Social Progress

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Report of Working Group on Social Progress Philippine Development Forum Davao City, March 8, 2005

  2. Challenge of yesterday’s plenary • If we are to focus on effective execution of good plans, what should we be talking about? • If we are to act as if this is not business as usual, what should we be doing? • If we are to obtain greatest results in the window of opportunity of next 2-3 years, what should be giving priority?

  3. 1. Financing framework • Establish a medium-term financing framework for social services and attainment of MDGs, that: • Provides more resources than those currently planned under the MTPIP • Has support of NG, LGUs, donor community, private sector and civil society • Could start from 20/20 plan proposed before.

  4. Other features of framework • Allows growing budget for MDG-supportive programs as these scale up, with support from NG, LGU and ODA • Provide mechanism for additional funding support to IRA-poor localities • Include use of pork barrel spending for MDGs • Adopt demand-driven, market-led approach to sub-allocation of committed resources

  5. Financing linked to LGU buy-in • Allow government health institutions fiscal autonomy to increase cost recovery • Make LGU spending for education (SEF and others) part of total resources planning and management of education delivery • Adopt strategy for co-financing by NG and LGU of health and other social services necessary to attain MDGs

  6. 2. Action points: focus on rural poor • Expand convergence effort beyond present 3 provinces • Improve use of Philhealth benefit spending to increase availability and access to health care • Develop better models for delivery of MCH and infectious disease control services • Widen access to assets, micro-credit, knowledge and social services among poor • Address the continued depletion of human resources for health

  7. Other action points • Accelerate support to mobilize women for social services reforms • Scale up response to HIV-AIDS as “hidden and growing” not “low and slow” epidemic • Move on regulatory reforms in health and education • Adopt an effective population program and pass an RH law • Consider other possible “quick wins”

  8. 3. Build foundations for success • Insure “quick wins” and “fast-tracking” do not detract from building sound institutional foundations • Conduct poverty mapping in all communities and use household data to link local action with local responsibility • Advocate to create larger informed and impassioned constituencies committed to meeting MDGs

  9. More on foundations • Set annual MDG targets and create review linked to annual budget process and incentives for LGU performance • Ensure convergence of govt, NGO, private and donor efforts based on MDGs as organizing principle • Develop corps of leaders with awareness, attitudes, knowledge and skills to lead in effort to attain MDGs

More Related