150 likes | 367 Views
. . Agenda Objectives of unfair contract terms Scope of application Comparative analysis: UK, France, Belgium Transparency requirements General principles and burden of proof Black and grey lists Interpretation, effect and enforcement Conclusion. . . Objectives of unfair contract termsCouncil Directive 93/13/EEC on unfair terms in consumer contractsProposal of the EP and the Council on consumer rights COM (2008) 614 final, 8 October 2008Consumer protectionFair business-to-consumer commercial practicesRestoration of the balance of power.
E N D
1.
1st Corporate Counsel Symposium
Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts
Dirk Tirez
dirk.tirez@post.be
2. Agenda
Objectives of unfair contract terms
Scope of application
Comparative analysis: UK, France, Belgium
Transparency requirements
General principles and burden of proof
Black and grey lists
Interpretation, effect and enforcement
Conclusion
3. Objectives of unfair contract terms
Council Directive 93/13/EEC on unfair terms in consumer contracts
Proposal of the EP and the Council on consumer rights COM (2008) 614 final, 8 October 2008
Consumer protection
Fair business-to-consumer commercial practices
Restoration of the balance of power
4. Scope of application
“Consumer”: any natural person (Joined cases C-54199 and C-542/99 Idealservice Srl)
“Trader”: any natural or legal person
“Goods, services”: products
Contract terms drafted in advance by the trader or a third party, to which the consumer has agreed, with no power to influence the content, in particular where such contract is part of a pre-formulated standard contract
5. Comparative analysis: UK, France, Belgium
UK – OFT (www.oft.gov.uk)
Unfair contract terms guidance
Consumer Contract Regulations 1999, as amended
Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPRs)
Guidance for market sectors
6. Comparative analysis: UK, France, Belgium
France
CCA – Commission des Clauses Abusives
Recommendations
Advisory role to courts
Code de la Consommation, article LB2-1
www.clauses-abusives.fr
Legislation and case law of the French courts consulted by 2 million people in 2008
7. Comparative analysis: UK, France, Belgium
Belgium
Art. 31-32 of WHPC
“Onrechtmatige bedingen in consumenten overeenkomsten”
FOD Economie – Dienst bescherming van de Consumentenverkeer
Raad voor het Verbruik – Commissie voor onrechtmatige bedingen
www.mineco.fgov.be
8. Transparency requirements
Plain, intelligible language and legibility
Real opportunity to become acquainted
Express consent to any payment in addition to the remuneration
No representational requirements
9. General principles
A contract is regarded as unfair if, contrary to the requirement of good faith, it causes a significant imbalance in the parties’ rights and obligations arising under the contract to the detriment of the consumer
Assessment at the time of the conclusion of the contract, taking into account all circumstances
10. Burden of proof
Where the trader claims that a contract term has been individually negotiated, the burden of proof shall be incumbent upon him (Case C-237/02 Freiburger Kommunalbauten)
11. Black list: unfair terms in all circumstances
12. Grey list: unfair unless the trader proves they are fair
13. Examples of terms that may be unfair
Consumers being misled about the contract, or their legal rights
Consumers being denied full redress if things go wrong
Consumers being tied into the contract unfairly
The business not having to perform its obligations
Consumers unfairly losing pre-payments if the contract is cancelled
The business varying the terms after they have been agreed
Consumer being subject to unfair penalties
14. Interpretation and effect
In case of doubt, the interpretation most favorable to the consumer shall prevail
Unfair terms are not binding upon the consumer
Contract continues to bind the parties if it can remain in force without the unfair terms
15. Enforcement
“Adequate and effective”Case C-168/05 Centro Movil Milenium SLCase C-473/00, Cofidis SAJoined cases C-240/98 to C-244/98 Oceano Grupo Editorial SA
Consumer organizations, professional organizations (Case C-167/00, Karl Heinz Henkel)
Class actions
16. Conclusions
Develop standard terms and conditions
Have a commercial policy on B to C contract terms
Examine fairness of the terms across Europe
Adopt an adequate complaints handling procedure