html5-img
1 / 6

Mapping and Size Estimation of

Mapping and Size Estimation of male-to-female transgender community in 17 states of India: First level findings at the country level National Institute of Epidemiology, ICMR, Chennai, India. Technical Guidance: Dept. of AIDS Control Financial Sponsor: UNDP, India

mave
Download Presentation

Mapping and Size Estimation of

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mapping and Size Estimation of male-to-female transgender community in 17 states of India: First level findings at the country level National Institute of Epidemiology, ICMR, Chennai, India • Technical Guidance: Dept. of AIDS Control • Financial Sponsor: UNDP, India • Collaboration with CSHaRP • Field work -RA: SRI-IMRB

  2. Background: TG people recognized as a core population for whom the HIV intervention need to be scaled up Need: For effective planning, implementation and evaluation of HIV interventions among TG people, it is crucial to have information on mapping and size estimation Objective: To map the areas where TGs are available & estimate their sizes in 17 states where some baseline data were available Methods Study Period: December 2012 - September 2013 Study sites : 17 states Data collection methods: Detailed listing of the sites up to the district level was done with the help of stakeholders, especially NGOs/CBOs working with sexual minorities. Participatory approaches using key community informants (with Delphi consensus) for site identification and nomination methods for size estimates were followed by site-visits for verification. Validation: 10% of the districts from each state and a sub-sample of the sites were randomly selected and, an independent team visited those sites.

  3. Results 17 states Top 5 states with highest SE of TGS were: Maharashtra (10,057), Uttar Pradesh (8,001), Odisha (7,854), West Bengal (6,788) and Andhra Pradesh (5,401), comprising of 38,101 (61%) TGs/Hijras. Percentage distribution of number of sites in all study states Among 62,137 TGs, 29,097 TGs (47%) were associated with any Gharana and within the states, the highest proportion of TGs associated with any Gharana was in Maharashtra (77%, N=7762 of 10,057) and the lowest in Bihar (13%, N=138 of 1,053). • 62% (n=38,465) of the TGs were involved in sex trade. The top five stateswere UP (84%), Rajasthan (73%), Karnataka (72%), Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh (66% each).

  4. Urban/rural distribution: 4,157 (71.4%) urban/1664 (28.6%) rural = 5,821 total sites Percentage distribution of urban and rural sites in study states Percentage distribution of rural and urban sites in study states • Other Findings: • Nearly 45% of all sites, were public sites and only around 1.4% sites • were Brothels/hamams which was high in Karnataka (14.8%). • 29 districts in 17 states had a point estimate of 400 TG • Inter-state migration:>10% in 7 (out of 17) states; Inter-town/city • migration: >25% in 10 (out of 17) states. • ----------------------------------------------------

  5. Percentage distribution of rural and urban sites in study states • Implications • State level variations in the population size of Hijra/TG • communities are evident • Close to 3/5th of the Hijra/TG population is involved in sex-work • 15 exclusive TG sites in 10 states have been identified for the • Integrated Bio-Behavioural Surveillance (IBBA). • Limitations • Mixing of MSM and TG communities • Migratory nature • Some TGs from rural do not want to accept with their natural families; instead they prefer to –with their group, gharanasor Jamats. • ----------------------------------------------------

  6. Percentage distribution of rural and urban sites in study states • Thank you! • ----------------------------------------------------

More Related