slide1 n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Jim Martin, Ph.D. University of Oklahoma Zarrow Center 405-325-8951 Email: jemartin@ou PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Jim Martin, Ph.D. University of Oklahoma Zarrow Center 405-325-8951 Email: jemartin@ou

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 36

Jim Martin, Ph.D. University of Oklahoma Zarrow Center 405-325-8951 Email: jemartin@ou - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 107 Views
  • Uploaded on

Using the Student-Directed Transition Planning Lessons to Build the Student-Directed Summary of Performance. Jim Martin, Ph.D. University of Oklahoma Zarrow Center 405-325-8951 Email: jemartin@ou.edu Web: http://education.ou.edu/zarrow/. Agenda. Purpose of Special Education

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Jim Martin, Ph.D. University of Oklahoma Zarrow Center 405-325-8951 Email: jemartin@ou' - mave


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

Using the Student-Directed Transition Planning Lessons to Build the Student-Directed Summary of Performance

Jim Martin, Ph.D.

University of Oklahoma

Zarrow Center

405-325-8951

Email: jemartin@ou.edu

Web: http://education.ou.edu/zarrow/

agenda
Agenda
  • Purpose of Special Education
  • Student-Directed Summary of Performance to Frame Transition Assessment and IEP Transition Page Construction
  • Building the SD-SOP using the Student-Directed Transition Planning Lessons
seven transition steps
Seven Transition Steps
  • Students become involved in IEP Planning Process
  • Students complete a three-part transition assessment process.
  • Students write present level of academic achievement and functional performance
  • Students develop course of study
  • Students develop postschool linkages
  • Students work on attaining IEP and personal goals
  • Students build their Summary of Performance
student participation in transition discussions
Student Participation In Transition Discussions
  • Spirit behind IDEA encourages students to become actively involved in discussions IEP transition discussions.
  • We need to teach students how to become involved in these discussions.
  • Need to provide opportunities for students to become involved in these discussions.
slide5

Martin, J. E., Van Dycke, J. L., Greene, B. A., Gardner, J. E., Christensen, W. R., Woods, L. L., & Lovett, D. L. (2006). Direct observation of teacher-directed IEP meetings: Establishing the need for student IEP meeting instruction. Exceptional Children, 72, 187-200.

idea 2004 requires the summary of performance
IDEA 2004 Requires the Summary of Performance
  • Schools will provide students a summary of academic achievement and functional performance
    • includes recommendation on how to assist the child in meeting postsecondary goals
  • Must be done when students exit school.
slide7
SOP
  • Teacher-Directed SOP
    • Designed for educators and agency
    • Prepared by educators for use by students
      • Nationally created SOP
      • www.ldaamerica.org/aboutld/adults/docs/SOP_Template.doc
  • Student-Directed SOP
    • Designed for students, family, and agency
    • Prepared by students for use by students and family
    • OSDE Form 15 (Go to www.state.ok.us, then special education services, OSDE Forms, then to Form 15)
the sections of the sd sop

The Sections of the SD-SOP

As Adopted by Oklahoma

my summary of performance
My Summary of Performance
  • My Postschool Goals for One Year After High School
  • My Perceptions of My Disability
  • The School’s Perspective on My Disability
  • School Produced Summary of My Academic and Functional Performance
summary of performance
Summary of Performance
  • Section 1
    • Students describe their postsecondary goals to attain within one year of leaving high school, and the school’s recommendations to achieve each goal, and suggested accommodations and supports to assist in achieving the goals.
summary of performance1
Summary of Performance
  • Section 2
    • Students describe their disabilities, how their disability affects their performance, and useful high school supports and accommodations.
summary of performance2
Summary of Performance
  • Section 3 (Area of Functioning)
    • Completed in the junior year of high school.
    • School staff describe how the young adults’ disabilities affect their performance and useful accommodations and supports.
summary of performance3
Summary of Performance
  • Section 4
    • School staff will complete and review annually with the IEP team to determine goals, and if additional assessments will be needed to facilitate attainment of transition goals.
sd sop examples
SD-SOP Examples
  • Albuquerque Public School
  • Irving I.S.D. (near Dallas, TX)
  • What is YOUR school doing?
teaching students to develop their own sd sop

Teaching Students To Develop Their Own SD-SOP

Student-Directed Transition Planning

Lessons and Materials

student directed transition planning
Student-Directed Transition Planning
  • Purpose:To increase student involvement in transition planning discussions
  • U.S. Department of Education grant to develop lessons and research their effectiveness
  • Infuse best practices for reaching the largest number of students including those who are culturally and linguistically diverse
further education strengths

Pat is creative, and

prepares lessons

well ahead

of time so

that he is

successful

teaching

at Sunday

school.

I work on and plan

my Sunday school

lessons each

night after

doing my

home-

work. The

kids like

my lessons.

Pat works very hard to do well in

math. Pat is taking a more active role

In his IEP, and is learning what

accommodations work best for him.

We’ll arrange a visit to the

community college.

Further Education Strengths
  • Pat and his teacher combined information from the three sections into a summary statement.
  • Pat again looked for similarities, and shortened some phrases.
  • He wrote his strengths into a summary statement.

My family, teachers

And I agree that I

Will start out at our

Community college.

I’m learning what

accommodations work

best for me.

how will this work at your school
How Will This Work at Your School?
  • Who needs to be involved to develop and implement a transition education process?
  • What needs to occur for students to have opportunities to engage in the process?
  • What needs to happen to allow time for educators to facilitate the process?
  • What needs to happen for families to be involved in the process?
  • When will these happen in your school?
slide23

The Purpose of SPED

. . . a free appropriate public education that emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet students’ unique needs and to prepare them for further education, employment, and independent living.

slide24

SDTP Research

  • Phase 1
    • Does SD-TP increase student knowledge?
    • Does SD-TP increase student and family self-efficacy in the transition planning process?
  • Phase 2
    • Does combining the SD-TP and the Self-Directed IEP increase student and family participation in transition planning discussions at IEP meetings compared to either intervention alone?
slide25

Phase 1 Study - Method

  • Setting & Participants
    • 3 secondary schools
    • 35 students
    • 5 teachers
  • Random assignment into control & intervention groups
  • True/False & Multiple Choice Pre and Post-Tests
  • Student and Family Pre and Post Self-Efficacy Measures
slide28

Phase 1 Study - Results

ANCOVA was conducted to evaluate if there was a knowledge gain as a result of the lessons.

The scores on the Pre-Test were significantly related to the scores on the Post-Test, F(1, 32) = 18.36, p < .01.

There was a significant difference between intervention and control groups on the Post-Test after controlling for the effect of the Pre-Test, F(1, 32) = 4.58, p =.04.

Effect Size Partial Eta Squared = .125 (approaching large effect using .01= small, .06 = medium, .10 to .14 = large)

slide29

Pre/Post Test Mean Scores

While the difference in the scores on the pre-test was not statistically significant, this gap may indicate a difference in the groups despite the random assignment.

There was a noticeable statistically significant effect on the Post-Test, with a corresponding moderate to large effect size.

slide30

Student Self-Efficacy

  • Post-test comparison shows significant increase for students in the intervention group with moderate effect size
  • Significant increases for students in the intervention group on 7 of 10 self-efficacy statements
  • Student Intervention group mean scores increased on all statements
  • Mean scores for students in the Control group stayed about the same pre to post
slide32

Phase 2-Research Question

  • Will participation in both the Student-Directed Transition Planning (SDTP) lessons and the Self-Directed IEP lessons help students, families, and the IEP team learn how to actively participate in the transition planning process, compared to those who participate in either the Self-Directed IEP or the SDTP lessons alone?
references
References

Field, S., Martin, J., Miller, R., Ward, M., & Wehmeyer, M. (1998). Self-determination for persons with disabilities: A position statement of the division on career development and transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 21(2), 113-128.

Martin, J. E., van Dycke, J. L., Christensen, W. R., Greene, B. A., Gardner, J. E., & Lovett, D. L. (2006). Increasing student participation in IEP meetings: Establishing the Self-Directed IEP as an evidenced-based practice. Exceptional Children, 72, 299-316.

Martin, J. E., & Marshall, L. H. (1995). ChoiceMaker: A comprehensive self-determination transition program. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30(3), 147-156.

Martin, J. E., Marshall, L. H., Maxson, L., & Jerman, P. (1997). Self-Directed IEP. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.

Martin, J. E., Van Dycke, J., D’Ottavio, M., & Nickerson, K. (2007). The student-directed summary of performance: Increasing student and family involvement in the transition planning process. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals,30(1), 13-26.

Van Dycke, J. L. (2005). Determining the impact of Self-Directed IEP instruction on secondary IEP documents. Unpublished Dissertation.

slide36

For More Information Contact:

Jim Martin

University of Oklahoma

Zarrow Center for Learning Enrichment

Carpenter Hall Room 111

Norman, OK 73019

Phone: 405-325-8951

E-mail: jemartin@ou.edu

Web: http://education.ou.edu/zarrow/