1 / 5

Why Competitive Standards

This document discusses the advantages of competitive standards in reporting, as presented by Shyam Sunder at the AAA Doctoral Consortium in June 2007. It argues for allowing jurisdictions to adopt multiple sets of standards, fostering experimentation and innovation in reporting practices. Sunder presents fifteen reasons why competition in standards can help alleviate undue pressure from interest groups, provide better alignment with diverse clientele, and enhance the profession's judgment. This approach aims to promote a more adaptive and effective regulatory environment, addressing complexities in financial reporting.

matty
Download Presentation

Why Competitive Standards

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Why Competitive Standards Shyam Sunder Yale University AAA Doctoral Consortium Lake Tahoe June 13-17, 2007

  2. Standards Competition • Let the authorities in each jurisdiction choose two or more SETS of standards that companies are allowed to use in preparing their reports. Reporting companies pay a royalty to standard setting organization they choose, and these royalties are the sole source of revenue of the standard setting organizations (i.e., no SOX fees for FASB)

  3. Fifteen Reasons for Competitive Standards • Problem too complicated for a Cartesian solution; criterion for choosing standards unclear • GAAP started as common law, bottom up evolution of practice, not GIAS • Experimentation with alternatives will allow research data, comparison, discovery of better methods and learning • Competition places bounds on complexity • Introducing economic tension to help standard setter decisions • Language works through variation of meaning (Esperanto failed) • Examples: bond rating, auditing standards, university accreditation, appliances, state charter of corporations, stock exchanges, US and PA Deptts of Agriculture with no evidence of race-to-the-bottom

  4. Fifteen Reasons for Competitive Standards • One size does not fit all in a country or the world: clientele • Relief from undue pressure from interest groups on standard setters • Choice of standards set as an additional information signal • Protection from special interest capture of regulatory body • Uniform standards insufficient for uniform reports without uniform economies • Competition blocks endless progression towards detail in a fractal world (infinite detail) • Judgment as essence of a profession • Cancerous impact of standards on accounting education and quality of people

  5. www.som.yale.edu/faculty/sunder Shyam.sunder@yale.edu

More Related