1 / 16

Cardiac Electrophysiology, Perioperative Implications, Pacemakers/AICD

Cardiac Electrophysiology, Perioperative Implications, Pacemakers/AICD. Todd Akins, MD April 28 th , 2009. Intraoperative ECG. No Contraindications

martha
Download Presentation

Cardiac Electrophysiology, Perioperative Implications, Pacemakers/AICD

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Cardiac Electrophysiology, Perioperative Implications, Pacemakers/AICD Todd Akins, MD April 28th, 2009

  2. Intraoperative ECG • No Contraindications • ASA Standards “Every patient receiving anesthesia shall have the electrocardiogram continuously displayed from the beginning of anesthesia until preparing to leave the anesthetizing location.”

  3. Detects • Dysrhythmias, myocardial ischemia, conduction abnormalities, pacemaker malfunction, and electrolyte disturbances

  4. 3-Lead vs 5-Lead • 3-Lead: lead II axis parallels atria thus greatest p-wave voltage (rate determination) • Provides enhanced diagnosis of arrhythmias and inferior wall ischemia

  5. 3-Lead vs 5-Lead • 5-Lead: only way to get a “true” V5 • Lead V5 placed at 5th ICS, anterior axillary line • Detects anterior and lateral wall ischemia • “Modified V5” with a 3-Lead by placing LA at the V5 position (5th ICS, AAL) and selecting lead I for display

  6. Ideally • Lead II and Lead V5 monitored simultaneously with a 5-Lead • Use a 5-Lead in obese patients • If monitoring only a single lead, then choose lead to monitor based on patient’s history of prior ischemia or infarct (i.e. II if inferior MI, V5 if anterior or lateral)

  7. Artifact • Caused by patient or lead wire movement, electrocautery, 60 cycle interference, faulty electrodes • Monitoring filters help but can distort ST segments • Monitor confuses large t-waves or artifact as QRS complexes • Better conductance by cleaning skin with alcohol or degreaser, or exfoliating area

  8. Intraoperative MI • Commonly accepted criteria: • 1. flat or down sloping ST > 2mV, particularly with t-wave inversion • 2. ST segment elevation and peaked t-waves • *** Make sure volume is loud enough to hear while attention is elsewhere***

  9. Pacemakers • Classification: • 5-letter code (usually omit last 2 letters) • Chamber Paced ( O, A, V, D) • Chamber Sensed (O, A, V, D) senses p or r • Response to Sensing (O, T, I, D) • Programmability (O, P, M, C, R) • Antitachyarrhythmia Function (O, P, S, D) • Most common: VVI, DDD, or on tests DVI

  10. Functioning • If intrinsic HR < program (typically 72) then see spike then QRS and palpable pulse (100% capture) • If intrinsic HR > program, NO spike • When low battery, sensing lost before pacing output • Magnet defaults to VOO mode

  11. Interference • Electrocautery Interferes • Interpreted as intrinsic function and can suppress pacemaker • Solution is to place grounding pad as far from pacemaker as possible • ***mandatory continuous monitoring of arterial pulse during cautery by palpation or pulse oximetry

  12. PEARL • ***accentuated myospasticity from succinylcholine induced fasciculation or post-operative shivering can also suppress pacemaker

  13. Operative Implications • NO MRI------EVER • ECT is fine, but have magnet available • ESWL: • 1. risk of developing arrhythmias • 2. shock waves can damage components • Contact manufacturer for best method of managing device, i.e. Reprogram vs. magnet • Time ESWL shock wave to 20msec after r-wave to decrease incidence of arrhythmias

  14. AICD • Turn Off

  15. References • 1. Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ, Clinical Anesthesiology, 3rd ed., New York, McGraw-Hill, 2002, pp. 97-100, 124-125, 431-432 • 2. Chu, LF, clinical Anesthesiology Board Review, A Test Simulation and Self-Assessment Tool, McGraw-Hill, 2005, pp. 231-232

  16. Test Questions???

More Related