1 / 20

SHAPE Project ~ Overview and 1 st Year Results ~

http://www.shape-project.eu/. SHAPE Project ~ Overview and 1 st Year Results ~. @ Collaboration Meeting for FP6 & FP7 Projects Brussels, 10 & 11 June 2009. Dumitru Roman STI / University of Innsbruck, Austria dumitru.roman@sti2.at. Outline. Project overview Objectives Approach

marlo
Download Presentation

SHAPE Project ~ Overview and 1 st Year Results ~

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. http://www.shape-project.eu/ SHAPE Project ~ Overview and 1st Year Results ~ @ Collaboration Meeting for FP6 & FP7 Projects Brussels, 10 & 11 June 2009 Dumitru Roman STI / University of Innsbruck, Austria dumitru.roman@sti2.at

  2. Outline • Project overview • Objectives • Approach • Consortium • Technical solution overview • Metamodels: SoaML and ShaML extensions • Reference matrix • Tool suite • Methodology • Scenarios • Next steps

  3. Outline • Project overview • Objectives • Approach • Consortium • Technical solution overview • Metamodels: SoaML and ShaML extensions • Reference matrix • Tool suite • Methodology • Scenarios • Next steps

  4. SHAPE motivation & objectives Motivation: Lack of comprehensive methodological approaches supporting all phases of a service-oriented system engineering process In an integrated and efficient manner Involving all stakeholders throughout the process Core objectives: Integrated, tool-supported MDE framework for SOA engineering Extensionsto conventional SOA (SHA) Various technology platforms (conventional WS, Agents, SWS, P2P, Grid) Service Variability (configuration and extensions) Standardization via OMG Evaluationin industrial applications (StatoilHydro, Saarstahl)

  5. An MDE approach Metamodels for all aspects relevant for SOA / SHA development Tools for model-driven development by end-users Model Transformations for automated model generation Methodology for guided engineering support

  6. SHAPE consortium

  7. Outline • Project overview • Objectives • Approach • Consortium • Technical solution overview • Metamodels: SoaML and ShaML extensions • Reference matrix • Tool suite • Methodology • Scenarios • Next steps

  8. SoaML Find the latest document at: http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ad/08-11-01.pdf Revised submission per November 10th, 2008 See also: www.soaml.org

  9. SoaML goals Intuitive and complete support for modeling services in UML Support for bi-directional asynchronous services between multiple parties Support for Services Architectures where parties provide and use multiple services. Support for services defined to contain other services Easily mapped to and made part of a business process specification Compatibility with UML, BPDM and BPMN for business processes Direct mapping to web services Top-down, bottom up or meet-in-the-middle modeling Design by contract or dynamic adaptation of services To specify and relate the service capability and its contract No changes to UML

  10. SoaML UML Profile for ServiceInterface and Participants

  11. ShaML extensions • ShaML – extension of SoaML modelling that aims to capture additional concepts for semantically enabled heterogeneous service oriented architectures • Currently defined for flexible business models and service variability

  12. Reference matrix • The underlying organization scheme for the technologies developed in the project, providing the overall integration view

  13. Tool suite • Business modelling tools • SoaML/ShaML Editor • Variability • Semantics • Adaptativeness • Methodology tool • Adaptation to project needs • Transformations Current integration architecture:

  14. SHAPE Model Transformation Architecture

  15. SHAPE methodology

  16. Scenarios

  17. Outline • Project overview • Objectives • Approach • Consortium • Technical solution overview • Metamodels: SoaML and ShaML extensions • Reference matrix • Tool suite • Methodology • Scenarios • Next steps

  18. Next steps • Focus on the extensions for ShaML • Focus on incremental use and evolution of the SHAPE methodology and tools for the two SHAPE pilots • Finalisation of SoaML through FTF work – and related dissemination

  19. Thank you!

More Related