friend or foe pakistan s negative perception of the u s n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Friend or Foe? Pakistan’s Negative Perception of the U.S. PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Friend or Foe? Pakistan’s Negative Perception of the U.S.

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 9

Friend or Foe? Pakistan’s Negative Perception of the U.S. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 140 Views
  • Uploaded on

Friend or Foe? Pakistan’s Negative Perception of the U.S. JD McCabe jm7133a@american.edu http://www.eagle1.american.edu/~jm7133a SIS 600-005, Assen Assenov American University School of International Service. Research Question.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Friend or Foe? Pakistan’s Negative Perception of the U.S.' - markku


Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
friend or foe pakistan s negative perception of the u s

Friend or Foe? Pakistan’s Negative Perception of the U.S.

JD McCabe

jm7133a@american.edu

http://www.eagle1.american.edu/~jm7133a

SIS 600-005, AssenAssenov

American University

School of International Service

research question
Research Question
  • What demographic attributes are associated with an unfavorable view of the United States?

Research Hypothesis

  • Ha: Controlling for education, religion, gender, and age, Low income isassociated with a more unfavorable view of the United States.
literature review
Literature Review
  • Both studies were selected because they examine negative attitudes towards the US and use data from the Pew Global Attitudes Project
  • Losing Muslim Hearts and Minds: Religiosity, Elite Competition, and Anti-Americanism in the Islamic World, by Lisa Blaydes and Drew A. Linzer (2009)
    • Interviewed 13,000 individuals from 21 countries with large Muslim populations.
    • Finding: Increased secular-religious tensions within Muslim countries leads to a less favorable view of the US.
    • However, little contribution towards policy recommendation.
  • Correlates of Public Support for Terrorism in the Muslim World, by Ethan Bueno de Mesquita(2007)
    • Finding: Anti-American view is weakly correlated with public support for terrorism weak correlation, reveals problems with the dependent
      • Respondents are addressing a variety of concerns that are lumped into “support for terrorism.”
      • The question on “support for terrorism” conflates a variety of issues: defense of Islam from its enemies, suicide violence and other forms of violence, attacks on civilians, etc.”
slide4
Data
  • Level of Analysis: Country  Pakistan
  • Pew Research Center’s Global Attitudes Project: Common Concerns About Islamic Extremism, Muslim-Western Tensions Persist
    • Sample size = 2000 respondents
  • Reliability: 15% of the population missed due to security reasons in the rural tribal areas. Weighted the data to reflect the actual distributions in the country  Not ideal, but satisfactory.
  • Dependent variable
    • Opinion of the United States
    • Ordinal: (1)very Favorable, (2)somewhat favorable, (3)somewhat unfavorable, (4) very unfavorable
    • Nominal: (0) Favorable or (1)Unfavorable
  • Independent Variables
    • Income: Ordinal, (1,000 of RS) < 4, 4 – 7, 7– 10, 10 – 15, 15 – 20, 20 – 25, 25 – 30, > 30
    • Education: Ordinal
    • Religion: Nominal (1898 Muslim, 97 non-Muslim)
    • Gender: Nominal (999 women, 1001 men)
    • Age: I-R (18 - 99) (Mean = 35.3, Median = 32, Mode = 30)
descriptive statistics
Descriptive Statistics
  • Because the sample is representative of the Pakistani population, we may extrapolate our statistical analysis to the greater population.
  • 80% of Pakistanis have an unfavorable view of the US. As one of our main allies in MENA, this problem warrants investigation.
  • Furthermore, 95% of the population is Muslim, which may be an important demographic indication of an unfavorable view of the US.
descriptive statistics continued
Descriptive Statistics continued
  • Dependent: opinion of US
    • Ordinal: mean = 3.39, median = 4, mode = 4
    • Nominal: mean = .79, median = 1, mode = 1
  • Independents
    • Income, mean = 3.45, median = 3, mode = 2
    • Religion, mean = .95, median = 1, mode = 1
    • Education, mean = 3.49, median = 4 (school yrs 5 – 9), mode = 1 ( no formal education)
  • The dependent is uni-modal and reveals that a significant portion of Pakistanis dislike the US  79.7%
  • Similarly, the majority of the population is Muslim  95.1%
  • These modal measures of central tendency are fairly reliable due to their strength.
  • 10% of the data is missing for the dependent compared to .25 for Muslim
    • This could indicated a response bias in the study, but is the best data currently available.
bivariate analysis categorical lom dependent variable
Bivariate analysis - Categorical LOM dependent variable.
  • Due to the ambiguity of the bivariate analysis, further testing needs to be done in order to better determine the relationship
    • Note, chi2is more sensitive to differences in the large samples
  • DEPENDENT: Q7A. Please tell me if you have a very favorable, somewhat favorable, somewhat unfavorable or very unfavorable opinion of the United States?
probit regression marginal effects
Probit Regression Marginal Effects
  • Interpretations:
  • In the fifth and final model all coefficients are statistically significant.
  • All coefficients in Model 5 are positive
  • Gender – when changing from female to male the probability of an unfavorable attitude towards the US increases by 5.7%
  • Income – as income increases, the likelihood of disliking the US increases by .04 %  contrary to prediction
  • Religion – when changing from a non-Muslim to a Muslim the likelihood of disliking the US increases by 28.36% !!!
  • R2: In model 5, 2.6% of the variation in the dependent can be explained by its relationship to the independent variables.

Bivariate Dependent: attitudes towards the US

(1 = Unfavorable, 0 = favorable) predicted = .80

(*) Indicates significance at the .01 alpha level

(**) Indicates significance at the .05 alpha level

findings policy implications of the research
Findings & Policy Implications of the Research
  • Findings: Ultimately, I was unable to reject my null hypotheses. In fact, it could be argued that the opposite was proven
  • Increased income is associated with an increased likelihood of disliking the United States. Education has no discernible affect
    • However, Muslims have a greater probability of having an unfavorable view of the US than non-Muslims
  • My findings imply that the Pakistani’s unfavorable view of the US is not a socio-economic problem  in fact potentially the opposite
    • Unfavorable views are associated with Muslim males at higher income levels.
      • The income effect is low, but significant never-the-less
    • Implies that more research must be conducted specifically on this demographic in order to better understand the underlying issues
      • policies need to facilitate cohesion between Pakistani Muslims and the US.
        • Interfaith dialogue conferences and/or cultural exchange programs may be a starting point
        • Bombing Pakistani troops is ill-advised . . .