1 / 13

Utility theory

Utility theory. Fred Wenstøp. Decisions under risk T erminology. The likelihoods of the different states of nature are known in terms of probabilities subjective or objective Choices are between prices x 1, x 2, x 3... lotteries prices with certain probabilities

markers
Download Presentation

Utility theory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Utility theory Fred Wenstøp Fred Wenstøp: Utility

  2. Decisions under riskTerminology • The likelihoods of the different states of nature are known in terms of • probabilities • subjective or objective • Choices are between prices • x1, x2, x3... • lotteries • prices with certain probabilities • The choice will depend on the decisions maker's kind of rationality • and attitude towards risk Fred Wenstøp: Utility

  3. The St. Petersburg Paradox • Daniel Bernoulli 1738 • Suppose you are offered the following lottery • A coin is tossed until tails turn up the first time • If it happens at toss #1, you get kr 2 • If it happens at toss #2, you get kr 4 • If it happens at toss #3, you get kr 8 • etc..... • How much are you willing to pay to participate? Fred Wenstøp: Utility

  4. von Neumann-Morgenstern's axioms for preferential consistency I • Axiom 1. Complete ordering • All prices and lotteries can be ordered by the decision maker according to his preferences • No prices or lotteries can be incomparable • This is an uncontroversial axiom • To be able to speak about decision making, one must be able to decide Fred Wenstøp: Utility

  5. von Neumann-Morgenstern's axioms for preferential consistency II • Axiom 2: Transitivity • If the decision maker prefers • x to y • and • y to z • He must prefer x to z • Uncontroversial • Does not hold for football teams etc. Fred Wenstøp: Utility

  6. von Neumann-Morgenstern's axioms for preferential consistency III • Axiom 3: Continuity • Suppose that • x is preferred to y • y is preferred to z • You get a choice between • y for certain • or • x with probability p • z with probability 1-p • Then there must exist a value of p which makes you indifferent between the choices • Controversial in many situations where z is very bad • for instance irreversible environmental damages Fred Wenstøp: Utility

  7. von Neumann-Morgenstern's axioms for preferential consistency IV • Axiom 4: Reduction of compound lotteries • The only things that matter for the decision maker are the final prices and their probabilities • Therefore compound lotteries are identical to reduced lotteries • This means that fun of gambling is ruled out • The process whereby we arrive at the final prices is irrelevant Fred Wenstøp: Utility

  8. .8 A 400000 .2 0 300000 400000 .2 0 .8 B 300000 .25 0 .75 .25 .8 400000 .2 C 0 300000 0.75 0 vN-M axioms for preferential consistency V • Axiom 5: Substitutability • Suppose that you are indifferent between a price b and a lottery c • Then c and b can substitute each other in any compound lottery without affecting its attractiveness Fred Wenstøp: Utility

  9. The expected utility theorem • If a decision maker's preferences conforms to von Neumann-Morgenstern's axioms • Then it is possible to represent his preferences with a utility function • When the decision maker makes decisions according to his preferences, he is maximising expected utility • Utility function • Suppose x is a numerical price, u(x) is a function of x • xo is the worst possible price, u(xo) = 0 • x* is the best possible price, u(x*) = 1 • u(x) is monotone • Then u(x) is a utility function Fred Wenstøp: Utility

  10. The Allais paradox Fred Wenstøp: Utility

  11. Measuring a utility function • Select the working domain • As narrow as possible, still wide enough to contain all values you might want to analyse • Let the utility of the worst point be 0, and of the best point 1.0 • Offer a choice: • Either a 50/50 lottery between the end points • Or a certain outcome xc • Change xc until it is equivalent to the lottery • Then U(xc)=0.5 • Repeat the process as many times as needed • Use the new xc'sas new end points Fred Wenstøp: Utility

  12. Terminology • Certainty equivalent • Certain price which is equally attractive as a lottery • Risk premium • The difference between the certainty equivalent and the expected price • Risk averse utility functions are concave • Risk prone utility functions are convex • Risk neutral utility functions are linear Fred Wenstøp: Utility

  13. Insurance vs. betting • Insurance companies make their living from people who pay a risk premium to avoid uncertainty • Gambling organisations make their living from people who pay to achieve uncertainty • These are the same people! • How can it be explained? Fred Wenstøp: Utility

More Related