1 / 29

Tropical Peatlands and Global Carbon Budget

Tropical Peatlands and Global Carbon Budget. Daniel Murdiyarso Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) I Nyoman Suryadiputra Wetland International – Indonesia Program (WI-IP) Regional Carbon Budgets Workshop: From Methodologies to Quantification Beijing, 15-18 November 2004.

marin
Download Presentation

Tropical Peatlands and Global Carbon Budget

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Tropical Peatlands and Global Carbon Budget Daniel Murdiyarso Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) I Nyoman Suryadiputra Wetland International – Indonesia Program (WI-IP) Regional Carbon Budgets Workshop: From Methodologies to Quantification Beijing, 15-18 November 2004

  2. Outline • Basic terminology and approaches • Global significance of petlands • Degrading peatlands • Role of fires • Methodologies and quantification • Static vs dynamic • Towards modeling/predictive capabilities • Identified gaps • Trends • Conclusions

  3. Basic terminology Carbon stock (mass/area) Carbon pool (mass) Carbon flux Carbon emissions (mass/area/time) C-budget: distribution of C in the compartments and flux rate between them (units??) Residual: how large?

  4. Tropical peatlands • Globally the area of tropical peat is ca. 40 Mha • 50% in Indonesia • Formed over a period of 10,000 years • Depth ranges 1-12 m • Store 5,800 t C/ha (> 10 x tropical forests)

  5. Decreasing area (Mha)

  6. Peatlands and C-budgets • Annual GHGs released due to peatland drainage or degradation 2-20 tC/ha (Maltby and Immirzy, 1993) • Carbon stored in tropical peatlands 1700-2880 t C/ha (GACGC, 2000) • Forest fires in Indonesia during 1997 and 1998 involved 2.12 Mha of peatlands (Tacconi, 2002) • The estimated C-loss from peatland fires in 1997 ranged 0.81-2.57 Gt (Page et al., 2002).

  7. Disturbance regimes and terrestrial C-budget CO2 Plant respiration Soil and litter respiration Disturbance GPP Short-term carbon uptake NPP 60 Gt/yr Medium-term carbon storage NEP 10 Gt/yr Long-term carbon storage NBP 1-2 Gt/yr Source: IGBP Terrestrial Carbon Working Group (1998)

  8. Fire & Haze from Sumatra and Kalimantan Sep 11, 1997

  9. Can hotspots tell anything? Source: Murdiyarso et al. (2002)

  10. Estimated C-loss 7 Mt

  11. But fire scars may not tell everything 1989 1997

  12. Mega rice project – Central Kalimantan

  13.    El-Nino events 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 Fire event Area burnt (Mha) C-loss (Gt) SOI 3.6 0.1 0.5 11.6 (2.1) 0.45 0.01 0.06 1.45 (0.47) 1982 1987 1991 1997 Note: Global CO2 growth = 1.5 ppmv/yr (IPCC, 1995) LUC is both affecting and affected by climate change

  14. From methodologies to quantification? • C- loss from peatland degradation (field data) • Area of change – remote sensing • Bulk density – lab analysis • C-content – lab analysis • Depth of peat layer – auger bor • Emissions from volatile biomass burning • Future development • Leaching of dissolved elements (organic carbon) • Towards modeling exercises

  15. n C-loss =  (A x B x C x D) i = 1 i Estimating C-loss from peatlands *) Occupy relatively thin layer of less than 50 cm

  16. Estimated C-loss 3.5 Gt 0o 0o

  17. Land-use trajectory and fallow periods Primary forests High secondary forests Low secondary forests Change of stocks Shrubs Logged-over forests Tree-based systems Bare Crop-based systems Imperata | | | | | Years 5 10 20 30 40 Long cycle (Protected areas) Medium cycle Short cycle

  18. 250 3 200 150 Carbon stocks, Mg ha-1 2 100 1 50 0 Mature forest Annual crops Shrubs Logged-over forest Young agroforest Older agroforest C-stocks in changing land-use

  19. CENTURY: Forest - Cassava - Imperata

  20. CENTURY: Forest - Rice/Bush fallow

  21. Emissions from biomass burning - 1997 Source: Levine (1998)

  22. Burning and nutrient losses • Nutrient losses due to volatilisation during the burning of residual biomass are generally higher than the losses by leaching (Bruijnzeel, 1998) • This is not only for N, which comprise of more than 90 percent of the biomass but often also for mineral nutrients • Reduction of burning in land clearing practices will reduce atmospheric losses • Burning also increases leaching losses compared to non-burning practices (Malmer et al., 1994)

  23. Trends – peatland development • Needs of agricultural land expansions • Growing oil-palm and pulpwood industries • People in-migration into the area • Unclear tenure systems (conflicts remain)

  24. Trends – fire will be used • Fire is the cheapest method for land clearing • Fire can add ash that temporarily improve soil conditions • Pests and weeds control • The economic value of the biomass ‘waste’ is so low • Smallholders’ wood pricing discourages producers

  25. Economic values of peatlands goods* *) Based on survey conducted in East Kalimantan from 100 respondents. **) Converted using an exchange rate of US$ 1 = Rp 8,500 Source: Wetlands International, 2004

  26. Fresh impetus …… • 23 Jul 2004 – Indonesian Parliament approved the Law on the Kyoto Protocol ratification • 23 Sep 2004 – Germany geared towards the inclusion of avoiding deforestation (in addition to A/R) in the CDM in the 2nd commitment period • 23 Oct 2004 – Duma voted in favor of Russia’s accession to the Kyoto Protocol • ASEAN Agreement on Fires and Haze Transboundary Pollution • ASEAN Peatlands Management Initiative (APMI)

  27. Future research questions • What are our fundamental understanding of peatland ecosystems vulnerability to climate change? • How can the understandings be disseminated to influence public policy-making? • Are there scientifically sound adaptive management options for the ecosystems to mitigate climate change? • How accessible the markets are? • Multilateral: e.g GEF/GCF to pay extra for carbon removed in biodiversity/watershed conservation projects • Bilateral: ODA, DNS • Unilateral: national and local markets

  28. Conclusions • Peatland is an important terrestrial C-stocks under increasing human pressure • Peat forest clearing followed by drainage makes the landscape more susceptible to fires • Decreasing peatlands area is associated with decreasing depth and carbon content • C and nutrients are mainly released into the atmosphere during fire in addition to DOC and nutrient leaching and drainage • Modeling C-budgets on tropical peatlands requires the incorporation of human dimensions

  29. Acknowledgements We gratefully acknowledge the support of the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA)

More Related