1 / 31

Sound Radiation from an Open Pipe with a Mean Flow - Doctoral Forum

This Doctoral Forum presentation discusses the sound radiation from an open pipe with a mean flow and its main acoustic phenomena, measurement results, estimation of sound radiation, analytical and numerical approaches.

Download Presentation

Sound Radiation from an Open Pipe with a Mean Flow - Doctoral Forum

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Doctoral Forum University of Music and Performing Arts Graz June 16, 2017 Drasko Masovic Sound Radiation from an Open Pipe with a Mean Flow Supervisors: Prof. Dr. R. Höldrich, Prof. Dr. G. Eckel, Dr. A. Fuchs

  2. Contents • Case study • Main acoustic phenomena • Measurement results • Estimation of sound radiation • analytical approach • numerical approach

  3. Case study • Geometry • Mean flow • Sound wave

  4. Geometry • Axisymmetric geometry (2D) • Pipe • straight circular semi-infinite • thin rigid wall • Opening • straight cut • sharp edge

  5. Mean flow • Jet • gas – dry air • low Mach number: M = V/c < 0.3 • temperature: 20ºC < T < 300ºC • Surrounding gas • cold and still air

  6. Sound wave • Sound source • deep inside the pipe • Sound wave • low frequency (Helmholtz number: ) • example: • a = 2cm, c = 343m/s → f < 2.5kHz • small amplitude (SPL < 150dB)

  7. Applications • Automotive applications • exhaust system, tail-pipe • pass-by noise • excitation of vehicle’s body • air-conditioning outlets • Musical applications • wind instruments • sound field in rooms • spatial sound synthesis

  8. Main flow/acoustic phenomena • incident sound wave • diffraction at the edge • refraction in the mixing region directivity diffraction refraction

  9. Analytical approaches • Levine and Schwinger (1948) • no mean flow • low frequencies

  10. Analytical approaches • Munt (1977) • (hot) mean flow • full frequency range • + accurate for low frequencies and cold flows • – mathematically involved, few physical interpretations • – oversimplified mean flow (→ inaccurate refraction)

  11. Laboratory measurements M = 0.3, T = 20°C, ka = 0.18, 0.36... Atvars et al. (1965) M = 0.2, ka = 0.53, T = 38°C, 149°C, 260°C T = 20°C, ka = 0.53, M = 0, 0.1, 0.3…

  12. Experimental setup flow equipment acoustic equipment

  13. Experimental setup Blower Elektroror SD 900 max. volume flow 14.5m3/min power 11kW

  14. Experimental setup Heaters total power 110kW

  15. Experimental setup Loudspeaker DAP audio AB-12 freq. range 55-2500Hz RMS power 300W

  16. Experimental setup Microphones NTi Audio M2230 equivalent noise level 16 dB(A) accuracy ±1dB @ 20-4000Hz

  17. Experimental setup Excitation signal – swept-sine Sound acquisition – 18 microphones Mean flow: M = 0, 0.05, ... 0.25 T = 40°C, 100°C, 200°C, 300°C Measured: the directivity patterns

  18. No-flow (reference) case Comparison with Levine & Schwinger (1948)

  19. Very low frequencies (negligible refraction) M = 0.1 T = 40...300°C • ka = 0.1 M = 0...0.25 T = 40°C • ka = 0.1 ·· measured – Munt (1977) ·· measured – Munt (1977)

  20. Increasing frequency M = 0.25 T = 300°C ka = 0.1...0.9 ·· measured – Munt (1977)

  21. Simple model • incident sound – plane wave inside the pipe • diffraction – vortex-sound interaction at the edge • (low M and low ka values) • refraction in the mixing region diffraction refraction

  22. Estimation of the directivity diffraction refraction

  23. Estimation of the directivity diffraction refraction

  24. Numerical calculations • Fluid Dynamics • Acoustics M = 0.25

  25. Numerical calculations • Computational Fluid Dynamics • Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations (RANS) • Computational Acoustics • Method 1: Linearized Euler Equations (LEE) • Method 2: Convected Wave Equation (CWE) M = 0.25

  26. Computational acoustics M= 0.25, T = 300ºC, ka= 0.3 Method 1 (LEE) + accurate (includes vortices) – unstable – high computational costs Method 2 (CWE) + efficient and robust – inaccurate (no vortices)

  27. Computational acoustics Method 2 + “vortex effect” + implicit vortex at the edge + efficient and robust – limited to low M and low ka values M= 0.15, T = 41ºC, ka= 0.5

  28. Summary • Systematic measurements of the directivity • effects of the mean flow (velocity and temperature) and frequency • low Mach number, low frequency • Simple physical model • insight into the key physical phenomena • reasonable accuracy • simple geometries and flows

  29. Summary • Numerical calculations • comparison of different acoustic equations and numerical techniques • Method 2 + “vortex effect” • improved accuracy compared to Method 2 • lower computational costs and more robustness compared to Method 1 • range of validity?

  30. Publications • D. Masovic, F. Zotter, E. Nijman, J. Rejlek, and R. Höldrich, “Directivity measurements of low frequency sound field radiated from an open cylindrical pipe with a hot mean flow,” 9th ISNVH Congress, Graz, SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-1822, 2016 • D. Masovic, “Comments on convective amplification of sound sources in flows,”, ASRO Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 20-23, 2016. • D. Masovic, E. Nijman, J. Rejlek, and R. Höldrich, “A simple model of the far-field directivity of an open circular pipe with a hot flow,” in Proceedings of DAGA 2017, Kiel, pp. 1222-1225, 2017. • D. Masovic, E. Nijman, J. Rejlek, and R. Höldrich, “Towards a boundary condition for convective wave equation and sound diffraction at a trailing edge inside a flow,” in Proceedings of DAGA 2017, Kiel, pp. 1301-1304, 2017. • Planned: • D. Masovic, E. Nijman, J. Rejlek, and R. Höldrich, “'Comparison of different approaches for calculation of sound radiation from an open pipe with a flow”, ICTCA 2017, Vienna, July/August 2017

  31. Doctoral Forum University of Music and Performing Arts Graz June 16, 2017 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!Drasko Masovic

More Related