Combinatorial Chemistry. O. P. O. C. H. 3. polarity. backbone. selectivity. TOF. ligating group. size. residue. TON. flexibility. A. C. B. Backbone Diversity Analysis in Catalyst Design. Ana Maldonado, Gadi Rothenberg
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Backbone Diversity Analysis in Catalyst Design
A world of possibilities
In homogeneous catalysis, the combination of laboratory automation and advanced modelling algorithms puts us on the brink of in silico catalyst design. To realise this goal, we must assemble and screen virtual libraries of ligand-metal complexes (Figure 1). Catalyst selection is the major problem.
Generating millions of structures via computer is easy, but how should we choose the candidates for synthesis and testing?
Scheme 1. Nickel Catalysed Hydrocyanation of butadiene in the Nylon process.
The backbone dataset is described using three main attributes: size, flexibility, and polarity, extracted from a list of 168 computed descriptors. PCA score plots (Figure 3) as well as descriptor maps (Figure 4) were built for the backbone dataset. Diversity analysis was done by computing the average distance of each catalyst to all other catalysts in Figure 4.
Figure 1. Left: catalyst decomposition framework in building blocks. Right: a catalyst space generated by thousands of combinations.
Backbone Diversity holds the key
The ligand backbone often dictates the ligand size and flexibility, which are related to the reaction pocket environment and the catalytic performance. Choosing the right backbone is a crucial step in ligand design.
By analysing the backbone diversity in the descriptor space (space B, Figure 2) we can generate a diverse spread of ligand-metal complexes over a given catalyst space A.
Figure 3. PCA score plot of the backbone dataset. Zero centred graph is shown in blue. Green circles shows clusters and red circles outliers.
Figure 2. Space A (the catalyst space), is a grid containing the metal-ligand complexes. Space B (the descriptor space) contains the values of the catalyst descriptors, and space C contains the figures of merit.
Figure 3. Backbone 3D descriptor space
The combination of the original 42 backbones with 10 ligating groups and 20 residues, represents a catalyst space of 1.1×109 possible combinations. Sampling even 1% of this is practically impossible.
Our selected subset of 24 representative backbones correspond to 10.000 bidentate catalysts, which represents a reasonable 3.79% of the 2.6×105 total combinations.
What’s next? This database serves as a basis for further QSAR and in silico catalyst design for the Ni-catalyzed hydrocyanation of butadiene.
Application to hydrocyanation catalysis
We examined a group of 42 backbones of a set of biphosphite and biphosphine ligand-nickel complexes used for catalysing the hydrocyanation of butadiene to adiponitrile (Scheme 1). Each catalyst was divided into two L ligating groups, a backbone B, and the residue groups R (Figure 1). This division gives a standard framework for backbone comparison.
1. Understanding ligand diversity. J. A. Westerhuis, J. A. Hageman, H. -W. Frühauf and G. Rothenberg, Chim. Oggi - Chemistry Today, 25, 28-32 (2007).
2. Molecular Similarity and Diversity: Concepts and Applications. A. G. Maldonado, M. Petitjean, J.-P. Doucet and B.T. Fan., Molecular Diversity, 10, 39-79 (2006).