The failure of 21st century intelligence
1 / 27

The Failure of 21st Century Intelligence - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

The Failure of 21st Century Intelligence. Robert David Steele Intelligence Coach [email protected] Prepared 24 October 2002. Elements of Intelligence. Covert Action Black Ops Mind Ops. Collection Human Technical. Leadership Mindset Courage. Analysis Current Estimative.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'The Failure of 21st Century Intelligence' - marcie

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
The failure of 21st century intelligence

The Failure of 21st Century Intelligence

Robert David Steele

Intelligence Coach

[email protected]

Prepared 24 October 2002

Elements of intelligence
Elements of Intelligence

  • Covert Action

  • Black Ops

  • Mind Ops

  • Collection

  • Human

  • Technical

  • Leadership

  • Mindset

  • Courage

  • Analysis

  • Current

  • Estimative

  • Counter-intelligence

  • Defensive

  • Offensive

Brief history of intelligence
Brief History of Intelligence

  • Secret War

    • For centuries, this has been the primary focus on national-level intelligence. It remains valid.

  • Strategic Analysis

    • Sherman Kent introduced this as the focal point, but he was not successful. It remains valid.

  • Smart Nation

    • This is where I think we need to go. More later.

Global collection failure i ignored open source information
Global Collection Failure IIgnored Open Source Information

  • 80% of what we need to do intelligence is not secret, not digital, not in your language, and not owned by the government.

  • We failed to treat open sources with respect. We need OSINT!

Global collection failure ii very limited non official cover
Global Collection Failure IIVery LimitedNon-Official Cover

  • 80% of the bad boys and girls that we need to recruit/monitor for clandestine operations do not attend Embassy cocktail parties.

  • We have been lazy and cheap about non-official cover (in USA).

Global collection failure iii almost no technical processing
Global Collection Failure IIIAlmost noTechnical Processing

  • If we do not process what we have collected (generally at great expense), we might as well not collect it at all--we can save the money.

  • CN + PN = IntelNN

  • Processing Matters!

Global processing failure i no data standards
Global Processing Failure INo Data Standards

  • Data standards (for instance, XML) are vital if we are to be able to exploit modern information technology.

  • Microsoft is the enemy of the state! Open source software, and data standards, add value to your work.

Global processing failure ii no geospatial attributes
Global Processing Failure IINo Geospatial Attributes

  • Automated “all-source fusion” is not possible unless every datum, in every medium, has both a time and a geospatial attribute.

  • XML Geo needs to be an international standard--you can lead.

Global processing failure iii no interoperability or all source mixing
Global Processing Failure IIINo Interoperability or All-Source Mixing

  • Security is the opposite of intelligence.

  • Compartmentation is the enemy of knowledge.

  • There must be one single processing agency where everything can be mixed and evaluated.

Global analysis failure i emphasis on security instead of answers
Global Analysis Failure IEmphasis on Security Instead of Answers

  • Intelligence is about decision-support--about answering the question!

  • Must not confuse expertise, foreign languages, and security clearances nor should we require that the same person have them all! Mix and match...

Global analysis failure ii focused on threats instead of opportunities
Global Analysis Failure IIFocused on Threats Instead of Opportunities

  • Threats that are here and now represent a strategic warning failure.

  • Intelligence is at its best when it makes the case for preventive investments--anticipatory policy--opportunities for advantage.

Global analysis failure iii emphasis on local now vice global future
Global Analysis Failure IIIEmphasis on Local Now Vice Global Future

  • Greatest intelligence value comes from strategic estimative analysis about big issues--global issues

  • Politicians already know the local nuances--must teach them--and the public--the global tradeoffs

Global policy failure i failure to impact on budget
Global Policy Failure IFailure to Impact on Budget

  • National intelligence has virtually no impact on how the citizen’s taxes are allocated across various national priorities.

  • We spend too much on hard power and almost nothing on soft power.

Global policy failure ii failure to impact on policymaker wisdom
Global Policy Failure IIFailure to Impact on Policymaker Wisdom

  • Policymakers are loosely-educated and often dismiss the value of global knowledge.

  • Intelligence is most valuable to the public interest when it constantly educates policymakers in a compelling manner.

Global policy failure iii failure to win public support for intelligence
Global Policy Failure IIIFailure to Win Public Support for Intelligence

  • Intelligence is not taught in schools and there is no public appreciation for its vital contributions.

  • We must establish a public discipline of intelligence across the seven tribes and in the public eye.

Global acquisitions failure i failure to impact on what we buy

US military buys what contractors want to sell, not what we need.

Strategic generalizations about the real world have no impact on procurement.

US ignores allied interoperability and affordability needs.


Aviation temperatures

Cross-country mobility

Line of sight distances

Bridge loading limits

Ports (-), Airheads (+)

C4I anti-Internet/open

OOTW assets (MP etc.)

Global Acquisitions Failure IFailure to Impact on What We Buy

Global acquisitions failure ii failure to impact on private sector it

Failed to legislate stable transparent Application Program Interfaces (API).

Failed to define generic functionalities for joint development.

Failed to define an agile security architecture.

Global Acquisitions Failure IIFailure to Impact on Private Sector IT



Global acquisitions failure iii failure to provide for intelligence

US mobility, weapons, and C4I systems do not program funds for the acquisition and delivery of necessary data.

Intelligence is treated as a “free” good.

Commanders “assume” intelligence will be provided when needed.

Global Acquisitions Failure IIIFailure to Provide for Intelligence

Global operations failure i cannot do wide area surveillance
Global Operations Failure I for the acquisition and delivery of necessary data.Cannot Do Wide Area Surveillance

  • US satellites optimized for finding Soviet missile silos

  • Air-breather options never had the processing system created to do near real time change detection.

  • Still a labor intensive “hit or miss” activity.

Global operations failure ii cannot do last mile
Global Operations Failure II for the acquisition and delivery of necessary data.Cannot Do Last Mile

  • Can’t see under jungle canopy or into city streets

  • Can’t find single individuals with technology--still a clandestine human endeavor and generally can’t do it

Global operations failure iii cannot do real time change detection
Global Operations Failure III for the acquisition and delivery of necessary data.Cannot Do Real-Time Change Detection

  • Air Operations Plans now require 24+ hours to prepare (US/NATO)

  • Sensor to shooter processing is terrible--and mostly manual

  • Have lost ability to do quick reaction strikes--when the lawyers let us.

Philosophical failure i national tribe instead of global tribes
Philosophical Failure I for the acquisition and delivery of necessary data.National Tribe instead of Global Tribes

  • National intelligence tribe has monopolized the money/attention.

  • Failed to create generic intelligence discipline with seven tribes.

  • Failed to develop regional or global intelligence networks.

Philosophical failure ii government secrecy over public sharing
Philosophical Failure II for the acquisition and delivery of necessary data.Government Secrecy Over Public Sharing

  • The new paradigm rewards sharing more than secrecy.

  • Secrets are primarily valuable in the context of a rich open source knowledge foundation.

  • Cannot have smart spies within dumb nation.

Philosophical failure iii letting americans lead is wasteful
Philosophical Failure III for the acquisition and delivery of necessary data.Letting Americans Lead is Wasteful

  • American dominance of NATO intelligence is wasteful & dangerous.

  • We need a European alternative emphasizing commercial security, web-based sharing, multi-cultural approaches, global burden-sharing.

Conclusion i spies only know secrets
Conclusion I for the acquisition and delivery of necessary data....spies only know secrets

  • Intelligence is about discovering, discriminating, distilling, and delivering ANSWERS.

  • The problem with spies is they only know secrets.

  • So, we still need secrets, but we need to be smarter about the context for our secrets.

Conclusion ii spies schoolboys
Conclusion II for the acquisition and delivery of necessary data.Spies & schoolboys

  • We do not get extra points for collecting information in the hardest or most expensive way.

  • Do not send a spy where a schoolboy can go.

  • Find, Get, Buy, Steal--in that order.

Conclusion iii make sense or add value
Conclusion III for the acquisition and delivery of necessary data.Make sense or add value

  • If you cannot make sense of the raw data, or add value, you are not creating intelligence.

  • It’s about actionable answers, not about secrets, or spies, or toys.

  • Intelligence saves time, lives, money, and honor.