“A Rose for Emily”. Reader Response Criticism. What is reader-response criticism?. Moves the focus from the text of a work of literature to the reader’s reaction to that text.
PowerPoint Slideshow about '“A Rose for Emily”' - mara-randolph
An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Moves the focus from the text of a work of literature to the reader’s reaction to that text.
Asserts that the reader participates in the production of the meaningin a work. (As opposed to Formalists, remember, who think that the work produces its own meaning, independent of author or reader.) Different readers coming from different cultural contexts or time periods will produce different (but not mutually exclusive) readings of a text, and reader response critics are interested in tracing how this process of the construction of meaning happens.
Is interested in how a reader who is familiarwith the language and literary conventions used in a work of literature interacts with the text.
Does the text seem to display an awareness of its reader? What assumptions does the text make about that reader? (There is a concept that says that a text assumes an “ideal reader,” and reader response critics are interested in how a work tries to influence that “ideal” reader, as well as how readers who do not fit that ideal respond to the work.)
Does the text make an effort to produce certain responses in the reader? How? Are these efforts successful?
Imagine several different possible readers for a text. How might each of these readers interpret the text differently? Why?
In describing your own reaction to a text, consider how you are similar to, or different from, the original audience in terms of values and cultural assumptions.
How might a reader’s reaction to a particular text change during a second reading?
The narrator in this story is never given a name, but he (or she…) functions as a character in this story, acting as the “voice” of the entire community of Jefferson who watched Emily Grierson’s story unfold. How does the narrator’s (and by extension, the community’s) attitude toward Miss Emily change over the course of the story? Did your attitude toward her change as well? Where?
This story is not told in a “linear” fashion. It skips around in time a great deal. How did this meandering, fragmented approach to time affect your response to this story? (Remember, the story starts and ends with the day Emily Grierson died, and everything else we find out about her is sandwiched in between these two “bookends.)
In what other ways is the theme of time important to this story? What characters and items symbolically represent this theme? How? What do you think Faulkner is trying to say about time and history?
Family and community are both very important to this story. The narrator is continually drawing our attention to how the community reacted to Miss Emily’s actions, and the importance of relatives and kin is stressed time and time again. What do you think this story is saying about how individuals live and interact as part of a larger group with common expectations and values?