250 likes | 363 Views
This document outlines the Norwegian Law Commission's recommendations for reforming maritime contract law, examining the historical failures of the 1970s reforms and addressing current issues such as electronic documentation, multimodal transport, and the implications of liability limitations. The report delves into carrier obligations, shipper responsibilities, jurisdiction, and arbitration, while also considering the integration of sales contracts and letters of credit. It emphasizes the need for clarity in service agreements and the balance of risk allocation in contemporary maritime law.
E N D
The Norwegian Law Commission’s recommendation– a general approach Professor Erik Røsæg Nordisk institutt for sjørett erik.rosag@jus.uio.no folk.uio.no/erikro
History • The failure of the reforms in the 1970ies • US law reform • Multimodal transports – maritime hegemony • Electronic documents • Integration of sales contracts and letters of credit • New trends in contract law
Outline of the Rules Right of control Transfer of rights Limitation of liability Time limitation Jurisdiction Arbitration Freedom of contract Other conventions Final clauses • Definitions • Scope • Electronic documents • Carrier’s obligations • Carrier’s liability • Special rules • Shipper’s obligations • Transport documents • Delivery of the cargo
Ratification • Yes • Timing • Jurisdiction and arbitration
Implementation technique • Amending the Maritime Code • Individual articles identifiable • Order changed • Drafting style
Final risk allocation • Wrong focus? • Initial risk allocation • Adjustment through price mechanisms
Mandatory • The weaker party • Mandatory rules come at a cost • Cui bono? • Lawyers • Reluctance to use normal contract law • The Norwegian Commission’s approach
Tackle to tackle • First and last terminal • Art. 12(3) • Travaux préparatoires
Merchant haulage • No duty to contract door to door • Documents wider than transport obligation • Clarity
Service agreements • Grater freedom • USA and Europe
Basis of liability • Negligence • Navigational errors • Fire • Unseaworthiness • How it works
Limitation • Insurance costs and total costs • 3 SDR/ 875 SDR • Montreal 19 SDR • Up 50% / 31% • Inflation 731% • No tacit amendment • Privity
Delay • Special limits for delay • Goods damaged by delay
Shipper • Shipper ≠ avskiper • Shipper = contractual shipper • «Contractification»
Shipper’s liability • Liability situation • Basis for liability • Limitation of liability?
Direct action and respondeat superior • General principle of respondeat superior • Direct action on maritime performing parties • No rule on non-maritime performing parties • The distinction
Scope • Mandatory scope • Outside the scope • National transports
National transports • The RR apply • Special limitation regime • National transport as part of an international transport
Relation to Ch. 14 of the MC • Current rules • New approach
Time limitation • Action within two years • Extension • Counterclaims and set-off
Delivery of the goods • Clear delivery mechanisms • Delivering without a negotiable transport document
Right of control • Explicit rules • Similar to delivery • Limited freedom of contract
Position of the receiver • No liability for passive holder • Receiver’s liability • Freight prepaid
Relationship to EU • Competence and supremacy • Jurisdiction • Choice of law • Other? • Ratification
Provisions of the current maritime code • Cancellation • Quantum meruit