Deterrence and the Death Penalty - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

deterrence and the death penalty n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Deterrence and the Death Penalty PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Deterrence and the Death Penalty

play fullscreen
1 / 101
Deterrence and the Death Penalty
172 Views
Download Presentation
mandy
Download Presentation

Deterrence and the Death Penalty

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Deterrence and the Death Penalty Llad Phillips

  2. Current News: Death Penalty

  3. Outline • The Death Penalty • Arguments • Philosophical and moral (lexicographic ordering) • Practical: Is it a deterrent? • Impact on the criminal justice system: Detention (prison building era) dominates • Operation of the Death Penalty • Homicide and Executions

  4. IV. Lecture Four: “Deterrence and the Death Penalty”, Professor Phillips Ch. 10 (P&V) "Isolating Deterrence Using the Simultaneous Equation System" References: Gary Becker, "Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach" Journal of Political Economy, March/April 1968 (RBR)

  5. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7532034279766935521

  6. What purpose did the execution serve? • Deterrence? Other Saddams? (The Hague) • Detention? No • Rehabilitation? No • Retribution?

  7. 1976 Supreme Court Reinstates Death Penalty

  8. Economic Conditions and Crime • California Crime Index Levels Off in the New Millenium

  9. 1980

  10. California

  11. California

  12. Damages: US Violence, 1993 Source: National Institute of Justice, Victim Costs and Consequences (1996)

  13. Increase in CA Homicides • 2002 to 2003: at least 10 more homicides • @$1,191,000, increased damages of $11.9 million, minimum • 2003: 2402 homicides, 6.7/100,000 • @$1,191,000, total damages of $ 2.86 billion • 2004: 2392 homicides, 6.5/100,000 • 2005: 2503 homicides, 6.8/100,000 http://caag.state.ca.us/

  14. Schematic of the Criminal Justice System Causes ? Weak Link Offense Rate Per Capita Crime Generation Expected Cost of Punishment (detention, deterrence) Expenditures Crime Control

  15. Questions About Crime • Does the Expected Severity of Punishment Deter Crime? • expected severity = probability of punishment * severity of punishment • e.g. in LA County: 0.005*death penalty • Why Do We Keep Building Prisons at Great Expense to Warehouse Convicts? • Doesn’t deterrence work? • Do we have to rely on detention?

  16. Controversy About the Death Penalty • Death penalty is the most severe sentence. • Does it deter crime? • Opponents of the death penalty say no. • Their evidence? Critiques of studies that indicate the death penalty is a deterrent. • Why are so few murderers who receive the death sentence executed in California? • Death sentence appeases the proponents. • Few executions appeases the opponents.

  17. France was the last Western European Country to abandon the death Penalty in 1977

  18. http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook

  19. http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/

  20. Executions in the US 1930-2007 http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs Peak to Peak: About 65 years

  21. Bureau of Justice Statistics Peak to Peak: 50 years

  22. Nikolai Kondratieff (1892-1938) Brought to attention in Joseph Schumpeter’s Business Cycles (1939)

  23. 2008-2014: Hard Winter

  24. Policy Impact of Opponents to the Death Penalty • As an instrument for crime control, deterrence has been a casualty of the argument about the death penalty. • The argument: if the death penalty does not deter murderers, then deterrence must not work as a control. • As a consequence, society relies more and more on detention for crime control. • Society builds more and more prisons.

  25. Homicide in Los Angeles County • 1990-1994: 9442 homicides • Increasing number of gang murders • > 40 % of the total • Only 1 in 3 murders leads to punishment • gang killings are harder to solve

  26. Clearance Ratio, CA 1997-2004

  27. Clearance Ratio, US 1976-2005

  28. US Homicides by Circumstance: 76-05

  29. Branching Diagram unsolved 46% other 9442 homicides in LA County 13% 54% dismissed or not guilty solved 87% 32% arrest and prosecution (47%) 68% guilty (32%)

  30. Branching Diagram, Continued dismissed or not guilty Manslaughter 15 years to life (7.0%) 50% Guilty (32%) 25 years to life (5.0%) 50% 1st & 2nd degree murder (16%) life without parole (3.5%) 3.1% death sentence ( 0.5%)

  31. Stable Down Up

  32. Who has benefited the most from the decline in the homicide rate in the nineties?

  33. Who is the victim, family, friend or stranger? http://caag.state.ca.us/ Homicide in California, 1998

  34. U.S.

  35. Death Sentences Commuted:US

  36. Executions in the United States