430 likes | 520 Views
Explore MIT's e-commerce initiatives, strategies, and success measures, showcasing how electronic catalog, SAPweb requisitioning, and VIP card systems streamline procurement processes. Delve into the advantages and challenges of the ECAT model, and discover the roadmap for future enhancements in e-commerce at MIT.
E N D
E-Commerce @MIT EDUCAUSE 2000 October 11, 2000 Bob Ferrara, Director, I/T Delivery Lorraine Rappaport, E-Commerce Project Manager
Agenda - E-Commerce@MIT • Overview of MIT’s initiatives • Bob Ferrara • Electronic Catalog (ECAT) demo • Lorraine Rappaport • What we have learned • Bob Ferrara
MIT E-Commerce Goals • Strategy based on MIT ReEngineering objectives from mid-1990s • Goals included: • Consolidate suppliers • Reduce paper-based transactions • Outsource lab and office supplies • Leverage buying power
MIT E-Commerce Landscape • Buy-side initiatives came first • ECAT – two generations of web ordering from partner vendors • VIP Card – procurement credit card • SAPweb – online web requisitioning • No personalized portals, e-marketplaces…yet • Infrastructure developed • X.509 certificate authority for authentication • EDI server deployed for vendor transactions • SAP for authorizations and approvals
MIT E-Commerce Landscape • Sell-side efforts are current focus • Online ordering through Internal Providers for intra-MIT transactions • Web ordering and online credit card processing for MIT merchants • ShopSite for catalog development • CyberCash and/or other software for credit card processing
VIP Card • The VIP Card is a just credit card but… • MIT pays the invoices • SAP receives daily batch of invoices • Approvers may distribute charges • Transaction history maintained in SAP and MIT data warehouse • Average transactions/month: 6,000+ or 44% of all procurement transactions • Average dollar volume/month: $1.2m • Average transaction value: $196
SAPweb Requisitioning • SAPweb is a simpler, home-grown extension of the SAP GUI screens • Four functions: • Create Requisition • Display Requisition • List Requisitions • Display PO (including payment history) • Avoided deployment of SAPgui all over campus • Average number of reqs./month: 3,000+ or 25% of all procurement transactions
ECAT • ECAT (short for Electronic CATalog) is MIT’s system for online ordering from our preferred vendors for commodity items. • ECAT is fully integrated with our SAP R/3 system for requisitioning, workflow approvals, and invoicing.
ECAT Design Strategy • Preferred vendor relationships • Vendor-managed product catalogs • Vendor capabilities – OBI, EDI • Authentication – x.509 digital certificates • Integration with SAP for requisitioning, authorizations, approvals, payment processing, reporting, etc.
ECAT Implementation • First vendor, NECX, rolled out in February, 1999 • Office Depot, BOC Gases, and VWR Scientific Products added later • Average transactions/month: 2,000+ or approximately 15% of all transactions • Discussions underway with four prospective new ECAT partners
Why Not Use the VIP Card for ECAT? • Many fewer VIP Cards than users with requisitioning authority in SAP (1500 cards vs. 4000 requisitioners) • Equipment purchases not allowed on VIP Card • VIP Card purchases limited to $3,000 (was $500 when we started) • Very limited reporting of VIP Card transactions in SAP • Our prices would likely be higher as vendors would pay transaction fees
Advantages of the ECAT Model • Fully integrated with SAP • Modular design • Familiar look-and-feel for users • Takes full advantage of vendors’ value-added features (e.g., MIT recommended products, MSDS, searches, etc.) • Allows procurement staff to focus on vendor relationship management and outreach
Disadvantages of the ECAT Model • Multiple vendor sites – different capabilities and navigation • Direct connections to each vendor • Many components to maintain • Not scalable to all vendors • Back-end batch processing in SAP and at vendor sites mean that order placement is not quite real time
The Road from Here • Are we having fun yet? Success measures • Looking ahead • Lessons Learned
Are we having fun yet? How do we measure success? • Results: Achieved goals; statistical measures • Relationships: • Vendors - managing relationships has high costs • Internal relationships - end-user, centralized / de-centralized experience, communication, training • Above all - managing the change issues • Process: understand business before technology
Looking Ahead • Can commercial solutions fit? • Greater aggregation and coherence for customer – catalog experience • Individual relationships vs. catalog aggregators and marketplaces • Greater influence on vendors: • Emphasize de-centralized purchasing • Authentication and authorizations • Standards – OBI, EDI, and XML • Focus and development on internal providers strategies
Lessons Learned: if you’re thinking of doing e-commerce • “E-business is just business” – understand your business objectives first • Don’t be afraid to dabble – you don’t have to get it right the first time • Make sure your solution is flexible enough to adapt to evolving technology and user requirements
Lessons Learned: continued • Interdependencies carry some risks: • Reliance on other systems and their schedules, interfaces, and support • Communication and collaboration are critical to success • Understand the impact of change on vendors, customers, and central office staff • Have fun. This is cool stuff.
For more information • Main SAPweb page: http://web.mit.edu/sapweb • Main ECAT page: http://web.mit.edu/ecat • ECAT design specifications: http://web.mit.edu/ljr/www/ecat_spec.html • This presentation: http://web.mit.edu/ljr/www/presentations/educause2000.ppt
Contacts • Lorraine Rappaport, ljr@mit.edu, 617-253-0749 • Bob Ferrara, rferrara@mit.edu, 617-253-7495
Appendix on e-marketplaces • Intriguing concept with many benefits: • Access to wide variety of suppliers • Easier to add new vendors • Some offerings are very expensive for buyers and sellers • Integration with buyers’ internal systems still needs work • Do they help or hinder vendor partnerships?
Appendix on XML • We are hoping to experiment with XML with one or two new vendors • Expected benefits: • XML should lower barriers for small and medium size vendors • XML provides ability to use same data in different ways for different audiences • Current limitations: • Many different and proprietary versions of XML • ebXML and RosettaNet initiatives may resolve some problems
Appendix on XML (cont.) • The ebXML and RosettaNet consortia initiatives may resolve some problems by developing a technical framework for for utilizing XML to exchange business data • http://www.ebxml.org • http://www.rosettanet.org • The two initiatives overlap and are expected to converge