Optimality, robustness, and dynamics of decision making under norepinephrine modulation:
Download
1 / 15

Joint work with Philip Eckhoff and Phil Holmes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 81 Views
  • Uploaded on

Optimality, robustness, and dynamics of decision making under norepinephrine modulation: A spiking neuronal network model. Joint work with Philip Eckhoff and Phil Holmes. Sloan-Swartz Meeting 2008. Experimental results: Cellular level.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Joint work with Philip Eckhoff and Phil Holmes' - mandel


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Joint work with philip eckhoff and phil holmes

Optimality, robustness, and dynamics of decision making under norepinephrine modulation:A spiking neuronal network model

Joint work with Philip Eckhoff and Phil Holmes

Sloan-Swartz Meeting 2008


Experimental results cellular level
Experimental results: Cellular level under norepinephrine modulation:

  • Norepinephrine (NE) modulates EPSP, IPSP, cellular excitability

  • Locus coeruleus (LC) supplies NE throughout the brain

  • LC neurons exhibit tonic or phasic firing rate mode

  • [NE] release approx linear to tonic firing rate of LC

| | | || | | | | || | | | || |

Tonic mode

| | || ||||||| | | | | |

Phasic mode

Berridge and Abercrombie (1999)


Experimental results behavioral level

Aston-Jones et. al (1999) under norepinephrine modulation:

Aston-Jones and Cohen (2005)

Experimental results: Behavioral level

Inverted-U shape performance in behavioral tasks


Past modeling work
Past modeling work under norepinephrine modulation:

(i) Connectionist modeling e.g. Usher et al (1999); Brown et al (2004); Brown et al (2005)

(ii) Normative (Bayesian) approach e.g. Yu and Dayan (2005); Dayan and Yu (2006)

(iii) Biophysical modeling work are more concerned with signal-to-noise ratio, e.g. Hasselmo (1997); Moxon et al (2007).


Joint work with philip eckhoff and phil holmes
Goal under norepinephrine modulation:

To link cellular to behavioral level of LC-NE modulation, in the context of a decision-making reaction task task, and study the decision circuit’s performance (reward rate) using a spiking neuronal network model


A spiking neuronal network model for 2 alternative forced choice decision making tasks
A spiking neuronal network model for 2-alternative forced-choice decision-making tasks

  • Neuronal model: Leaky integrate-and fire

  • Recurrent excitatory synapses: AMPA, NMDA

  • Inhibition: GABAA

  • External inputs (background, stimulus): AMPA

  • Task difficulty depends on:

    (I1 - I2) /(I1 + I2)

Decision time

Choice 1 made

I1

I2

X.-J. Wang (2002)


Performance in a reaction time task rate of receiving reward
Performance in a reaction time task: forced-choice decision-making tasksRate of receiving reward

  • Reward rate = (Total # of correct trials) / (Total time)

  • Total time = Sum of Reaction time + Response-to-stimulus interval

  • Reaction time = Decision time + non-decision latency

RT

RT

… …

… …

n trial

RSI

n+1 trial

Time


Tonic lc ne modulation of both e and i cells provides robust decision performance
Tonic LC-NE modulation of both E and I cells provides robust decision performance

Assume linear LC [NE] gsyn

“1” denotes

standard set of parameters of Wang (2002)

Robust performance for modulation of NMDA or AMPA, as long as E and I cells are modulated together


Neural dynamics under tonic modulation of e and i cells

Standard decision performance

Too high

Too low

Neural dynamics under tonic modulationof E and I cells

Unmotivated

Increasing

LC-NE

Standard/Optimal

Firing rate

Time

Impulsive


Differential tonic modulation between e and i cells
Differential tonic modulation between E and I cells decision performance

There exists a maximum robustness when synapses of E cells are modulated about half that of I cells


Single cell evoked response under tonic modulation
Single-cell evoked response under tonic modulation decision performance

Condition of maximum robustness also results in an inverted-U shape for single-cell evoked response. Since we used linear modulation, inverted-U shape is a pure network effect.


Phasic lc ne modulation
Phasic LC-NE modulation decision performance

NE = 100 ms

Delay = 200 ms

[NE] = F(LC) for phasic?

dg / dt = G( [NE] ) ? Assume linear.


Phasic modulation can provide further improvement in performance
Phasic modulation can provide further improvement in performance…

… provided glutamatergic modulation dominates over that of GABAergic synapses


Conclusion
Conclusion performance…

  • Inverted-U shape in decision performance

  • Tonic co-modulation of E and I cells provides robust performance (more expt on I cells needed to confirm)

  • Lesser affinity of E to I cells to tonic modulation results in: (i) maximum robust performance; (ii) inverted-U shape of single-cell evoked response (can be a pure network effect)

  • [NE] = F(LC) for phasic LC mode? If F is linear, our work shows that phasic modulation can further improve over tonic when modulation of glutamatergic synapses dominate over GABAergic.


Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements performance…

  • Barry Waterhouse, Drexel University College of Medicine

  • Jonathan Cohen, Princeton University

  • PHS grants MH58480 and MH62196

  • AFOSR grant FA9550-07-1-0537