Classical and Quantum Free Electron Lasers. Gordon Robb Scottish Universities Physics Alliance (SUPA) University of Strathclyde, Glasgow. Content. Introduction – Light sources The Classical FEL Spontaneous emission Stimulated emission & electron bunching
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Gordon Robb
Scottish Universities Physics Alliance (SUPA)
University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.
Conventional (“Bound” electron) lasers
En
En1
Pros : Capable of producing very bright, highly coherent light
Cons : No good laser sources at short wavelengths e.g. Xray
Synchrotrons
Pros : Can produce short
wavelengths
e.g. X rays
Cons : Radiation produced
is incoherent
Free Electron Lasers offer tunability + coherence
f
b
Radiation from an accelerated chargeStationary electron
Relativistic electron
v <~ c
q
b
Most energy confined to the relativistic emission cone
Energy emission confined to directions perpendicular to axis of oscillation
q= g 1
Nuperiods
Electrons can be made to oscillate in
an undulator or “wiggler” magnet
y
z
x
Consider a helical wiggler field :
lw
The electron trajectory in a helical wiggler can be deduced
from the Lorentz force
and
where
y
z
x
Electron trajectory in an undulator is therefore described by
Electron trajectory in a
helical wiggler is therefore
also helical
r
e
u
where:
Resonant emission due to constructive interference
The time taken for the electron to travel one undulator period:
A resonant radiation wavefront will have travelled
Equating:
Substituting in for the average longitudinal velocity of the electron,bz:
where
is the “wiggler/undulator parameter” or
“deflection parameter”
then the resonance condition becomes
The expression for the fundamental resonant wavelength shows us the origin of the FEL tunability:
As the beam energy is increased, the spontaneous emission
moves to shorter wavelengths.
For an undulator parameter K≈1 and lu=1cm :
For mildly relativistic beams (g≈3) : l ≈ 1mm (microwaves)
more relativistic beams (g≈30) : l ≈ 10mm (infrared)
ultrarelativistic beams (g≈30000) : l ≈ 0.1nm (Xray)
Further tunability is possible through Buand lu as K∝ Buu
Spontaneous emission is incoherent as electrons emit
independently at random positions i.e. with random phases.
Now we consider stimulated processes
i.e. an electron beam moving in both a magnetostatic wiggler
field and an electromagnetic wave.
EM wave (E,B)
Bw
electron
beam
Wiggler/undulator
Can calculate
How is the electron affected by resonant radiation ?
The Lorentz Force Equation:
Hendrick Antoon Lorentz
The rate of change of electron energy
is +ve
is +ve
is +ve
e
e
e
Resonant emission – electron energy change
Energy of electron changes ‘slowly’ when interacting with a resonant radiation field.
u
is +ve
is ve
Rate of electron energy change is ‘slow’ but changes periodically with respect to the radiation phase
For an electron with a different phase with respect to radiation field:
e
e
u
is +ve
Lose energy
Gain energy
Electrons bunch at resonant radiation wavelength – coherent process*
E
Axial electron velocity
r
Electrons bunch on radiation wavelength scale
Random
Perfectly bunched
Power N Pi
Power N2 Pi
For N~109 this is a huge enhancement !
In the previous discussion of electron bunching, assumed that the EM field amplitude and phase were assumed to remain constant.
This is a good approximation in cases where FEL gain is low
e.g. in an FEL oscillator – small gain per pass, small bunching, highly reflective mirrors
Usually used at wavelengths where there are good mirrors: IR to UV
Low gain is no use for short wavelengths e.g. Xrays as
there are no good mirrors – need to look at highgain.
Relaxing the constant field restriction allows us to study the fully coupled electron radiation interaction
– the high gain FEL equations.
The EM field is determined by Maxwell’s wave equation
where
The (transverse) current density is due to the electron motion
In the wiggler magnet.
Radiation field bunches electrons
Bunched electrons drive radiation
NewtonLorentz
(Pendulum)
Equations
+
Wave
equation
The end result is the high gain FEL equations :
Ponderomotive phase
Scaled energy change
Scaled EM field intensity
Scaled position in wiggler
Interaction characterised by FEL parameter :
We will now use these equations to investigate the highgain
regime.
We solve the equations with initial conditions
(uniform distribution of phases)
(cold, resonant beam)
(weak initial EM field)
and observe how the EM field and electrons evolve.
For linear stability analysis see :
J.B. Murphy & C. Pelligrini
“Introduction to the Physics of the Free Electron Laser”
Laser Handbook, vol. 6 p. 969 (1990).
R. Bonifacio et al
“Physics of the HighGain Free Electron Laser & Superradiance”
Rivista del Nuovo Cimento Vol. 13, no. 9 p. 169 (1990).
High gain regime simulation (1 x l)
Momentum spread at saturation :
Usually used at wavelengths where there are no mirrors: VUV to Xray
No seed radiation field – interactions starts from electron beam shot noise
i.e. Self Amplified Spontaneous Emission (SASE)
Strong amplification of field is closely linked to phase bunching
of electrons.
Bunched electrons mean that the emitted radiation is coherent.
For randomly spaced electrons : intensity N
For (perfectly) bunched electrons : intensity ~ N2
It can be shown that at saturation in this model, intensity N4/3
As radiated intensity scales > N, this indicates collective behaviour
Exponential amplification in highgain FEL is an example of a
collective instability.
Highgain FELlike models have been used to describe collective synchronisation / ordering behaviours in a wide variety of systems in nature including flashing fireflies and rhythmic applause!
LCLS (Stanford) – first lasing at ~1Å reported in 2010
Xray FELs under development at DESY (XFEL), SCSS (Japan) and elsewhere
Review : BWJ McNeil & N Thompson, Nature Photonics 4, 814–821 (2010)
High brightness = many photons, even for very short (
Xray FELs will have sufficiently high spatial resolution (l<1A)
and temporal resolution (
In 1960s, development of the (visible) laser opened up nonlinear optics and photonics
Intense coherent Xrays could similarly open up
Xray nonlinear optics (Xray photonics?)
In the optical regime, many phenomena and applications are
based on only a few fundamental nonlinear processes e.g.
Saturable absorption
Optical Kerr effect
holography
Qswitching
Pulse shortening
Mode locking
Phase conjugation
Optical information
Xray analogues of these processes may become possible
As SASE is essentially amplified shot noise, the temporal coherence of the FEL radiation in SASEFELs is still poor in laser terms i.e. it is far from transform limited
SASE Power output: SASE spectrum:
Several schemes are under investigation to improve coherence
properties of Xray FELS e.g. seeding FEL interaction with a
coherent, weak Xray signal produced via HHG.
In addition, scale of Xray FELs is huge (~km)
– need different approach for subA generation
A useful parameter which can be used to distinguish between the different regimes is the “quantum FEL parameter”, .
Induced momentum spread
Photon recoil momentum
where
: Classical regime
Note that quantum regime is inevitable for
sufficiently large photon momentum
: Quantum effects
In classical FEL theory, electronlight momentum exchange
is continuous and the photon recoil momentum is neglected
Classical induced
momentum spread (gmcr)
onephoton
recoil momentum(ħk)
>>
is the “quantum FEL parameter”
where
i.e.
We now consider the opposite case where
Classical induced
momentum spread (gmcr)
onephoton
recoil momentum(ħk)
<
i.e.
where
Electronradiation momentum exchange is now discrete i.e.
so a quantum model of the electronradiation interaction is required.
First quantum model of highgain FEL :
G. Preparata, Phys. Rev. A 38, 233(1988) (QFT treatment)
Procedure :
Describe N particle system as a Quantum Mechanical ensemble
Write a Schrödingerlike equation for macroscopic wavefunction:
Details in :
R.Bonifacio, N.Piovella, G.Robb, A. Schiavi, PRSTAB 9, 090701 (2006)
Electron dynamical equations
Average in wave equation becomes QM average
p
2
ò
2

q
q
Y
i
d
e
0
Single electron Hamiltonian
MaxwellSchrodinger
equations for electron
wavefunction Y
and classical field A
MS equations
in terms of
momentum
amplitudes
Assuming electron wavefunction is periodic in q :
cn2 = pn = Probability of electron having momentum n(ħk)
Only discrete changes of momentum are now possible
: pz= n (k) , n=0,±1,..
n=1
pz
n=0
n=1
bunching
classical limit
is recovered for
many momentum states
occupied,
both with n>0 and n<0
Evolution of field,
etc.
is identical to that of a classical
particle simulation
_
Dynamical regime is determined by the quantum FEL parameter, r
_
Quantum regime (r<1)
Only 2 momentum states occupied
p=0
p=ħk
CLASSICAL REGIME:
Until now we have effectively ignored slippage i.e. that v
When slippage / propagation effects included…
QUANTUM REGIME:
Quantum regime:
only n<0 occupied sequentially
Classical regime:
both n<0 and n>0 occupied
quantum regime
classical regime
R.Bonifacio, N.Piovella, G.Robb, NIMA 543, 645 (2005)
pump light
Pump
laser
Behaviour similar to quantum regime of QFEL observed in experiments involving
backscattering from cold atomic gases
(Collective Rayleigh backscattering
or Collective Recoil Lasing (CRL) )
lL
Backscattered
field
Cold
Rb atoms
l~lL
QFEL and CRL described by similar theoretical models
Main difference – negligible Doppler upshift of scattered field for atoms
as v <
See Fallani et al., PRA 71, 033612 (2005)
Implications for the spectral properties of the radiation :
Momentumenergy levels:
(pz=nħk, Enpz2 n2)
Transition frequencies equally spaced by
with width
Increasing the lines overlap for
QUANTUM REGIME:
→ a single transition
→narrow line spectrum
CLASSICAL REGIME:
→ Many transitions
→ broad spectrum
Conceptual design of a QFEL
lr
lL
Easier to reach quantum regime if magnetostatic wiggler is
replaced by electromagnetic wiggler (>TW laser pulse)
As “wiggler” wavelength is now much smaller, allows much lower energy beam to be used (smaller g)
e.g. 10100 MeV rather than > GeV
Experimental requirements for QFEL :
Writing conditions for gain in terms of :
Energy spread < gain bandwidth:
Bonifacio, Piovella, Cola, Volpe NIMA 577, 745 (2007)
In order to generate Å or sub Å wavelengths with
energy spread requirement becomes challenging (~104) for quantum regime .
May require e.g. ultracold electron sources such as those created by
Van der Geer group (Eindhoven) by photoionising ultracold gases.
Condition may be also relaxed using harmonics :
Bonifacio, Robb, Piovella, Opt. Comm. 284, 1004 (2011)
Quantum FEL  promising for extending coherent sources to subǺ wavelengths
QUANTUM SASEFEL
needs:
100 MeV Linac
Laser undulator (l~1mm)
Powerful laser (~10TW)
yields:
Lower power but better coherence
Narrow line spectrum
CLASSICAL SASEFEL
needs:
GeV Linac
Long undulator (100 m)
yields:
High Power
Broad spectrum
Collaborators
Rodolfo Bonifacio (Milan/Maceio/Strathclyde)
Nicola Piovella (Milan)
Brian McNeil (Strathclyde)
Mary Cola (Milan)
Angelo Schiavi (Rome)